The Heir, The Spare and the “Baby Brain” -The Prince Harry and Meghan show rumbles on…

[Lemonade20]

Catherine did not have it easy at the beginning. But she kept her head down, never complained and proved she can handle being in the royal family. The media was far worse to her than Meghan ("Waity Kate"). Meghan is definitely narcissistic, she cannot stand even one negative comment about her and tries to use "racism" as ammunition. This is the same woman who listed herself as "Caucasian" on her resume and also claims she's 43% Nigerian. She can't keep her lies straight.

 

[canbelto]

Catherine did not have it easy at the beginning. But she kept her head down, never complained and proved she can handle being in the royal family. The media was far worse to her than Meghan ("Waity Kate"). Meghan is definitely narcissistic, she cannot stand even one negative comment about her and tries to use "racism" as ammunition. This is the same woman who listed herself as "Caucasian" on her resume and also claims she's 43% Nigerian. She can't keep her lies straight.

Waity Kstie is not as bad as calling Archie a chimp omg. Also, Meghan didn't weaponize racism. The comments about her were racist. Go back to stalking Kurt Browning.

 

[airgelaal]

Waity Kstie is not as bad as calling Archie a chimp omg. Also, Meghan didn't weaponize racism. The comments about her were racist. Go back to stalking Kurt Browning.

No one defends the tabloids. The question was that the family protects Kate, but not Meghan. This is a comparison of wet with green. It is more honest to compare similar periods.

And in general, I am very surprised by the comparison of Meghan and Diana. Diana married at 20 and died at 36. While Meghan graduated from university, worked as an actress in Hollywood, got married and divorced. And only at 36 she married Harry. What was Meghan not ready for, having such a huge life experience? Not ready for the fact that the media will write a lot about her and not always well? I'm not saying that I don't believe her and she invented everything. But it's obvious to me that Harry sees in her the mother he lost when she was 36. But Meghan is not the mother who got married at 20. At 36, Diana successfully used the media herself. It was the media that gave her the status of people's princess. And I do not understand why Harry talks so much about his mother's legacy, but does not continue her work. Why does he fight with the media when they can be used. For good, as his mother used to do. And not to destroy the family like Harry does.
And I do not believe that the royal family did not allow them. They have not been in the family for 3 years, but they use the media to talk about the frozen penis. Oh yes, Harry's mother would be proud.

 

[canbelto]

No one defends the tabloids. The question was that the family protects Kate, but not Meghan. This is a comparison of wet with green. It is more honest to compare similar periods.

And in general, I am very surprised by the comparison of Meghan and Diana. Diana married at 20 and died at 36. While Meghan graduated from university, worked as an actress in Hollywood, got married and divorced. And only at 36 she married Harry. What was Meghan not ready for, having such a huge life experience? Not ready for the fact that the media will write a lot about her and not always well? I'm not saying that I don't believe her and she invented everything. But it's obvious to me that Harry sees in her the mother he lost when she was 36. But Meghan is not the mother who got married at 20. At 36, Diana successfully used the media herself. It was the media that gave her the status of people's princess. And I do not understand why Harry talks so much about his mother's legacy, but does not continue her work. Why does he fight with the media when they can be used. For good, as his mother used to do. And not to destroy the family like Harry does.
And I do not believe that the royal family did not allow them. They have not been in the family for 3 years, but they use the media to talk about the frozen penis. Oh yes, Harry's mother would be proud.

@Lemonade20 is the one who said that "waity Katie" in the tabloids was worse than the racist attacks against Meghan.

 

[airgelaal]

@Lemonade20 is the one who said that "waity Katie" in the tabloids was worse than the racist attacks against Meghan.

no one wrote that, it was just one example. As if this is the only thing Kate could be offended by

 

[Lemonade20]

Exactly, my point was the media can be brutal. Meghan made it seem like she was the only one under attack, but there have been countless of unflattering stories out and the Royal Family managed just fine. No one cried how unfair it was.

 

[Coco]

I thought the specific point Megan and Harry have repeatedly tried to make is that the entire family is under attack from the media, but the family only protects some members not others.

 

[once_upon]

Exactly, my point was the media can be brutal. Meghan made it seem like she was the only one under attack, but there have been countless of unflattering stories out and the Royal Family managed just fine. No one cried how unfair it was.

I dont remember anyone else being told they should be dragged naked on the public street with excrement thrown on them.

You do know how slaves were paraded to the auction block, right?

 

[Karen-W]

I asked you why you call them parasites when they are supporting themselves & you come up with this. IOW you can't defend your hateful statement but you will cling to it anyway. Why are you in this thread anyway when you clearly despise them? I guess other threads don't have the troll value that this one does.

OMFG. Just because they aren't FINANCIAL parasites doesn't mean that they aren't EMOTIONAL parasites. Get a grip and develop some level of reading comprehension before you come at me again.

 

[Sparks]

Where did you get your degree in Psychology?

 

[canbelto]

Reading this book -- despite all the tabloid teasers, it seems like Kate and Meghan had a fairly typical in-law relationship. They got along sometimes, didn't get along other times, were different people and mostly kept it cordial and moving.

It seems like they became proxies in the thorny, difficult Will/Harry relationship. Harrys tendency to idolize the women in his life and Will's bossypants personality is what the book is really about.

 

[airgelaal]

I dont remember anyone else being told they should be dragged naked on the public street with excrement thrown on them.

You do know how slaves were paraded to the auction block, right?

As far as I remember it's a recent quote.

 

[overedge]

As far as I remember it's a recent quote.

Yes, it was a recent quote, from Jeremy Clarkson. And he ended up apologizing for it. But it's not the only negative thing associated with race that has been said about Meghan, so I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

 

[canbelto]

It was actually Jeremy Clarkson who said he wanted to march Meghan through the streets and throw shit at her.

 

[MacMadame]

It was actually Jeremy Clarkson who said he wanted to march Meghan through the streets and throw shit at her.

Whoever said it, the palace did not say anything about it. Not even "sources at the palace" from what I read. I can't believe they didn't as condemning his statement was a no-brainer.

 

[overedge]

It was actually Jeremy Clarkson who said he wanted to march Meghan through the streets and throw shit at her.

Corrected, thanks. Sometimes it's hard to tell which bloviating middle-aged white guy commentator is which.

 

[airgelaal]

Whoever said it, the palace did not say anything about it. Not even "sources at the palace" from what I read. I can't believe they didn't as condemning his statement was a no-brainer.

I already wrote that the best policy for the palace now is not to comment on anything at all. Everything that concerns Harry and Meghan should be labeled No comments. Everything they say, Harry and Meghan, either personally or through Omid Skobie, will be used against them.
But I'm talking about something else. You can't demonize the palace first, and then be offended that it doesn't protect you. Harry escaped from the institute and got his freedom, so it's time to defend himself

 

[canbelto]

I already wrote that the best policy for the palace now is not to comment on anything at all. Everything that concerns Harry and Meghan should be labeled No comments. Everything they say, Harry and Meghan, either personally or through Omid Skobie, will be used against them.
But I'm talking about something else. You can't demonize the palace first, and then be offended that it doesn't protect you. Harry escaped from the institute and got his freedom, so it's time to defend himself

Certain things do deserve a "this is deeply offensive" comment though. Clarkson's comment was one of them. In fact, it was so offensive apparently he himself removed the article.
That's just on a human level. I wouldn't say that anyone deserved to be marched through the streets and have shit thrown at them. Wouldn't even say that about Trump.

 

[taf2002]

OMFG. Just because they aren't FINANCIAL parasites doesn't mean that they aren't EMOTIONAL parasites. Get a grip and develop some level of reading comprehension before you come at me again.

karen.

 

[airgelaal]

Certain things do deserve a "this is deeply offensive" comment though. Clarkson's comment was one of them. In fact, it was so offensive apparently he himself removed the article.
That's just on a human level. I wouldn't say that anyone deserved to be marched through the streets and have shit thrown at them. Wouldn't even say that about Trump.

As I said, I'm sure that Meghan and Harry would still blame the palace.
These words were so terrible that the audience reacted accordingly. I don't see any sense in the reaction of the palace either.

 

[MsZem]

Yes, it was a recent quote, from Jeremy Clarkson. And he ended up apologizing for it. But it's not the only negative thing associated with race that has been said about Meghan, so I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

I thought it was some sort of Game of Thrones reference? Whatever the inspiration, it was repulsive - and rightfully received massive amounts of condemnation.

I do wish people would stop comparing the abuse Kate and Meghan received. It was different, but none of it was acceptable.

 

[MacMadame]

I already wrote that the best policy for the palace now is not to comment on anything at all.

If they did that for everything, it would be okay. But they do it selectively. Not okay.

 

[once_upon]

If they did that for everything, it would be okay. But they do it selectively. Not okay.

The fact that they didn't condemn earlier racial remarks allowed the tabloids to become more emboldened and increasingly horrid. Similar to US politician emboldening the racial crap.

Clark claimed it was a GOT reference only when he was called out on it. The "I was just joking" BS. It took him at least a day to remove it. I'm not a POC, but even so, I recognized the slavery reference implications as I was reading it.

Even if you think the Royal Family should no longer defend Meghan, I would hope you would at least want them to speak out on the cruelty and racial overtones. Not encourage the Queen Consort to invite him to the Palace for tea.

EDITED TO CORRECT -Clarkson not Clark

 

[kwanfan1818]

I agree with your point, but I thought it turned out that the Queen Consort was an invited guest, not the host or in charge of the guest list.

 

[once_upon]

I agree with your point, but I thought it turned out that the Queen Consort was an invited guest, not the host or in charge of the guest list.

Ok, but no one has her at any event without every guest or anyone involved being pre approved by someone on the RF payroll. Someone in the inner circle approved that list.

There is enough influence to change any person's at the event or refuse her presence.

 

[kwanfan1818]

Someone in the inner circle approved that list.

Yes, which speaks to the toxicity of the "inner circle."

 

[once_upon]

Yes, which speaks to the toxicity of the "inner circle."

And is the experiences reported by Harry and Meghan.

 

[overedge]

Clarkson's comment apparently got more complaints from the public to the UK press regulatory body than any other article ever.

 

[airgelaal]

If they did that for everything, it would be okay. But they do it selectively. Not okay.

If I remember correctly, the last mention of Harry and Meghan was in the king's first speech. Or did I forget something?

Yes, which speaks to the toxicity of the "inner circle."

Harry wrote in his book

Meg’s difficult, he said.
Oh, really?
She’s rude. She’s abrasive. She’s alienated half the staff.

But this, of course, is not true. Because Meghan is a saint, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a liar. And when Harry and Meghan call the palace toxic, they are certainly telling the truth.
I'm not being ironic. I tried to read the part about Meghan, but it is impossible to read. In Harry's eyes, she is not human. She has no flaws. In my opinion, he idolizes her so much that he simply does not understand how someone can treat her differently. I don't think of Megan as a demon, but she is only human. And yes, people can have different personalities, and that's normal. But not for Harry.

And one more thing, I don't think there are simple people there.

 

[once_upon]

In my opinion a spouse should/does stand up for a spouse, especially to family members.

I dont think.Meghan is perfect or a saint without fault. But she also is not a demon or out to take down the entire British Empire and leave Harry with nothing, no one.

I also think it's hard for anyone not of color to recognize how insidious things/statements/attitudes are in society.