- Messages
- 21,469
Indeed.
Michelle Khan3 weeks ago
@Vickie Wyatt No I am not the joke and I am definitely no hater for your information, if you were intelligent enough you would notice and pay attention to Meghan and her body are there any changes in her weight? Any swelling? Her tummy dropped? then you will see what alot more people aside myself are speaking about but clearly you are not that smart!
Michelle Khan3 weeks ago
Give birth to a pillow or fake bump!! which apparently she forgets to put on at times I wonder if when the surrogate is in labor if Meghan will feel contractions?? This is the largest scam I ever came across. I deal with facts only idiots cannot see the truth, I do not hate her that's the first thing that flies out their mouth oh you're a hater, if someone is screwing up they need to be exposed especially when they got innocent people fooled.
Divine Deschabel3 months ago
Due to her age and jobs as a royal she probably wouldn't be able to conceive naturally. But an heir must be produced so surrogacy might be an ideal way. It's just the lies of the Royal Mafia's again that's all. You will know if a woman is pregnant by looking at the middle of her neck - the centre part should appear deeper like a well, indicating a life is living inside her. People are not fools but there's nothing much anyone can do! The Royals will do anything to keep everything controlled and secret.. So yeah so be it
Mehitable Storm5 days ago
Amazing My guess is something happened with the surrogate's pregnancy so they're trying to figure out how to get the baby from another source. Many think Markle is even a transgender, and I'm not going to argue - anything's possible nowadays.
While we're royal watching if you follow the Duchess Kate blogs every time she wears skinny jeans there is a meltdown of sorts. I once pointed out to people that Catherine has the sort of body where she has to wear skinny jeans. She has a long torso, narrow waist with no hips, and skinny jeans flatter that sort of figure. Has nothing with her wanting to be immodest.
Admin Edit: Please do not embed images here. Use links.
I have noticed that as well. As someone who is similar in height and proportion to Kate I totally get the skinny jean. Wide leg pants look seriously bad on me. The only time I can wear a bit of a flare is if the pants are high waisted and cropped.
I have also noticed that people call her jeans leggings. They are so not leggings!
Here is a pic of Kate with wide leg trousers. They look awful on her:
https://www.hellomagazine.com/image...lazer/0-307-927/kate-middleton-trousers-z.jpg
Here she is in skinnies. They just fit her figure so much better.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WdvFO_oY...bDcvW9-Q0SX3_l4YOlORgCLcBGAs/s1600/iapr15.jpg
How do y'all have time to find and read all this shite?So from the last thread:
Where to find crazy conspiracy theories. As someone found, there are youtube videos. I have not watched any. I like train wrecks but not that up close.
A few places for the quick versions:
Instagram Accounts: Messy the Duchess and What Meghan Wants are treasure troves of crazy. Both were suggested to me because I follow other royal oriented accounts. I don't follow but both are public last I checked and you can see the nonsense.
Twitter: Wallis Simpson (@YankeeWally) And the source for a lot of the rampant speculation a very odd account called TorotoPaper (@torontopaper1). My guess is it is someone screwing around with the Meghan haters, but they take it completely seriously and the vague things there seem to have begun the whole treason/Tower ideas.
And finally, a weird blog called Harry Markle on wordpress. The author claims to have expertise, degrees and professional experience in just about everything (history, media, PR, marketing, etc...) and fancies herself an authority on all things evil associated with Meghan. This is the sophisticated conspiracy site pretty much claiming that Meghan worked with friends to con Harry into marrying her. This blogger never makes bold accusations but latches on to stupid things to conclude that there are lies and conspiracies. There is a long post about the announcement on the Buckingham Palace Easel being slightly different than those for the Cambridge babies which, of course, means something is being covered up. Since she is sophisticated about it; she mostly leaves the readers to draw their own conclusions about what exactly the lies/cover ups are. She also has a Facebook page.
So from the last thread:
Where to find crazy conspiracy theories. As someone found, there are youtube videos. I have not watched any. I like train wrecks but not that up close.
A few places for the quick versions:
Instagram Accounts: Messy the Duchess and What Meghan Wants are treasure troves of crazy. Both were suggested to me because I follow other royal oriented accounts. I don't follow but both are public last I checked and you can see the nonsense.
Twitter: Wallis Simpson (@YankeeWally) And the source for a lot of the rampant speculation a very odd account called TorotoPaper (@torontopaper1). My guess is it is someone screwing around with the Meghan haters, but they take it completely seriously and the vague things there seem to have begun the whole treason/Tower ideas.
And finally, a weird blog called Harry Markle on wordpress. The author claims to have expertise, degrees and professional experience in just about everything (history, media, PR, marketing, etc...) and fancies herself an authority on all things evil associated with Meghan. This is the sophisticated conspiracy site pretty much claiming that Meghan worked with friends to con Harry into marrying her. This blogger never makes bold accusations but latches on to stupid things to conclude that there are lies and conspiracies. There is a long post about the announcement on the Buckingham Palace Easel being slightly different than those for the Cambridge babies which, of course, means something is being covered up. Since she is sophisticated about it; she mostly leaves the readers to draw their own conclusions about what exactly the lies/cover ups are. She also has a Facebook page.
balletmaus said:... Because this baby's totally special and completely different from other newborns.
Very few do, though of course the Duchess of Sussex is an American citizen and Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor is himself as American as apple pie.Of course this information has nothing to do with the Royals just a tidbit that Americans do name their children Archie.
Actress comedienne Amy Poehler (SNL) named her first born son (2008) with then husband Will Arnett, Archie.
I had been wracking my brain for awhile on which Hollywood actress named her son Archie and as I was watching
SNL last night and Amy Poelher had a cameo appearance and Bingo it came to me.
Of course this information has nothing to do with the Royals just a tidbit that Americans do name
their children Archie.
SEE ALL SLIDES
4 OF 6
PHOTO: ERIN BAIANO FOR NEW YORK CITY BALLET.
Did it help having other mothers in the company to look up to?
"I actually deferred to Ashley [Bouder] a lot, because we had almost the exact same story, and the same surgeon. I felt kind of safe, because I could be like, How do you deal with it? I borrowed some of her confidence. I was able to go through all of that [with her], instead of being jealous and feeling like a less-than person because you can’t make it happen the other way.
"There's just so much pressure to [have a vaginal birth], and that's a nice thought, but you're not in the driver’s seat. I'm not going to do anything to risk my baby’s health, so it is what it is. I'm really embracing it as part of my story, but it took so long it was really hard for me. I couldn’t hear about friends having baby in a vaginal way, I couldn’t hear about family members, I was in such a bad place with it. I struggled with it and I know it’s an issue for a lot of people."
I wonder if Meghan had a C-section and doesn't want to admit it. This whole shame around not having a vaginal birth is very real. For instance another "Megan" I follow, Megan Fairchild (dancer with NYCB) recently had a baby where a C-section was necessary. She gave this interview:
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/megan-fairchild-postpartum-ballet-interview#slide-4
I really, really don't get why this is a thing. I've known women who had C-sections. I've known women who had their babies while being driven to the hospital. Very very few women had that perfect birth in a bathtub surrounded by scented candles and Mozart playing in the background. The end goal is to have a healthy baby for whom you WILL spend the rest of your life mothering.
@Lorac I wonder if she herself is a year or two older than what she said when starting her acting career and that's the information she wants hidden.
IMO the one that may be true is that Archie is older that M&H say.
... And today's photo shows his feet longer than I would expect. Plus Harry's slip-up about him changing the 1st 2 weeks.
I wondered about the feet when I looked at the photo. My kids were all early so I assume overdue baby maybe just look a bit better cooked As for the birthdate, I am sure little Archie was born when they said he was. There is no way that kind of secret could be kept in this age of google!
One small note I would like to make. There have been a number of posts here, and articles and comments out there about “bonding with the baby immediately after birth.” I know lots of people think that is a thing, but it really isn’t. Yes, it is lovely to be able to hold your baby right after it is born, but many, many, mothers and fathers can’t for lots of different reasons. As the mother of a child who I didn’t get to hold until 24 hours after birth, the perpetuation of this myth can be really difficult. So many people made comments to me about how sad it was that I couldn’t hold her and asked me if it was difficult to bond with a baby who spent its first weeks in ICU. The answer to that is: no, it isn’t sad I am so happy she is alive, and no, bonding does not happen in the first moments or even hours after birth. Bonding takes place over years, not hours. Parents and adopted children bond, parents and children in ICU bond. It is just another one of those things people talk about and make comments about out of ignorance. Most mean nothing by it, but that doesn’t make it any less hurtful. It doesn’t bother me now, but in those first few weeks my dd was in hospital it created yet more stress in an otherwise stressful situation.
It might be better to use the phrase “enjoyed some private time” rather than referring to bonding.