Jot the Dot Dot
Headstrong Buzzard
- Messages
- 4,669
This news item about the British rapper Zuby (admit I never heard of him, but the issue raised is quite valid) breaking women's weightlifting records while 'identifying' as a woman for the duration of this publicity stunt made me think of starting a poll here. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-weightlifting-records-identifying-woman.html . Should genetically born men be allowed to compete in women's sports simply by announcing that they 'identify' as women? This is not to say that transgender women don't exist, but how can a person's pronouncements alter their chromosomes, their bone structure or muscle mass? If it's a chess tournament or spelling bee, that is one thing, as gender doesn't predetermine the outcome of those. But allowing biological men to compete against women in sporting events where physical strength is paramount would in most people's views make a mockery of such 'competitions'. Also, there is nothing to stop anyone from organizing their own unisex competitions, but the reason why such events have never gotten past the novelty stage - like Billie Jean King vs. Bobby Riggs - only proves my point, who would watch a match so overwhelmingly predetermined that it is a mismatch by definition? I doubt anyone of the caliber of a Roger Federer or a Rafael Nadel would pull such a stunt. But all it would take is one 'wet blanket' to demand the right to compete against biological women, and more and more, young girls will see their efforts be for naught.
ETA: I imagine the question of testosterone levels might be relevant, so I'll have the choice of a testosterone test tossed in (you try saying that 5 times in a row!).
ETA: I imagine the question of testosterone levels might be relevant, so I'll have the choice of a testosterone test tossed in (you try saying that 5 times in a row!).
Last edited: