I totally agree with you.
Feminists aren't the ones who have started re-defining what a woman is, according to gender rather than sex.
Indeed the younger women in the Western hemisphere have had it easier in some areas, mostly thanks to a lot of

feminists from the former generations.
Still, often something else has priority over women's problems and issues. It's the story of our lives.
In my early (Turkish) youth, various left-wing factions were dominant in universities and even high schools. Feminism was thought to be a bourgeois concept. The enemy was capitalism. The class struggle was going to to abolish all oppression, including that of women.
In the next decade, a three-year military regime and the erosion of democratic institutions killed those hopes. However, the enemy was militarism and the anti-democratic institutions. Democratisation was going to solve all these problems, including those of women.
Later, a government that became more and more Islamist eroded women's rights. Women's movements gained a lot in strength and became one of the most influential movements in the country. Still, they are hindered by the majority belief that it isn't a question of women's rights, but of human rights and secularity. The enemy is supposed to be Islamism and corruption. Going back to full secularity would solve all these problems, including those of women.
A pattern is emerging.
Last year when the president pulled Turkey out of the Istanbul Convention (for preventing and combatting violence against women) an association here in Paris held a question and answer session/debate on Clubhouse on this subject with young people from my alma mater.
Several of the young men commented that we were specifically discussing women's rights (translation: losing time with a small detail) while the whole country was going to the dogs. They thought we should first go
back to
normal.
We had to explain things to them step by step, including the fact that "back" and "normal" won't work for us. Sigh.