I think an archive of results, event breakdowns and great links to all the videos online would be great. I find I watch historical videos and go "wow that a crazy layback" or "cool! a 2A landing into a spin". There are some real treats that have gone away with IJS that need to be called out.
I wouldn't give up on the idea of complaining about judging. I would actually double down on this take and create sort of a 'Shadow Judging' site and on this initiative partner with a few knowledgeable people including some credible names such as Duhamel or White if interested.
Judge GP events and ISU championships. Re-do the judging sheets to what they SHOULD be with clear rationale for each mark (each component, base value, GoE) and thus call out the empirical magnitude of the incorrect judging. Be that detailed. I think your site would get traction over time, general media might comment on it and in best case scenario can influence the sport to judge properly.
Sure you'll get criticism with no formal judging training and things like SS need to be seen live, but you can keep the upper hand if no credible body is or willing to provide a counter argument. And if you DO get explanations that's also good for the sport.
The upside is you not only get to nurture a hobby but you could have a positive influence on the sport. Long shot but I think worth the time and energy.
I wouldn't give up on the idea of complaining about judging. I would actually double down on this take and create sort of a 'Shadow Judging' site and on this initiative partner with a few knowledgeable people including some credible names such as Duhamel or White if interested.
Judge GP events and ISU championships. Re-do the judging sheets to what they SHOULD be with clear rationale for each mark (each component, base value, GoE) and thus call out the empirical magnitude of the incorrect judging. Be that detailed. I think your site would get traction over time, general media might comment on it and in best case scenario can influence the sport to judge properly.
Sure you'll get criticism with no formal judging training and things like SS need to be seen live, but you can keep the upper hand if no credible body is or willing to provide a counter argument. And if you DO get explanations that's also good for the sport.
The upside is you not only get to nurture a hobby but you could have a positive influence on the sport. Long shot but I think worth the time and energy.
A friend and I had a webpage that has since been taken down - Skatemusiclist. But I still have the original data and I've kept it up. I have it on excel. Choreo info was pretty well non existant in the 80's. It was probably after 1994 that it became something of interest to skating fans. My friend and I had talked about adding a column in for choreo when we first started the spreadsheet, but so few skaters id'd their music let alone their choreo's. 
