Steph
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 563
Idly choreographing a Gilles & Poirier program to Dance Me to the End of Love in my head nowThere is so much great Cohen music that could make some really cool FD's And it has to be Leonard actually singing.
Idly choreographing a Gilles & Poirier program to Dance Me to the End of Love in my head nowThere is so much great Cohen music that could make some really cool FD's And it has to be Leonard actually singing.
Brooke McIntosh's younger sister - she's a World Champion swimmer.Who?
YesBy the way, isn't Justin Bieber Canadian?
I don't think there is anyway all 3 of the current top 3 for the next Games, with Gilles & Poirier do the most likely to choose not to. I base that just on all their own comments, and that they decided very late to even compete this season, not their physical ability to do it or anything. I would just be very surprised if mentally they have it in to stay that long. I agree Chock & Bates might stay for the next Games, although I don't think it is as certain as you do. I don't think any of the 3 are certain but order of likelihood would be Guignard & Fabbri > Chock & Bates > Gilles & Poirier.
Anyway if all 3 make it I would be very surprised. Fear & Gibson's scores are rising at a ridiculous level IMO. Their GOE imparticular are absurd, plus their PCS in certain areas like skating skills. So even if the top 3 all stayed it is unlikely they could all hold them off. I don't think they in anyway deserved to beat Fournier Beaudry & Sorensen at this years worlds yet they did. I felt awful for Fournier Beaudry & Sorensen at worlds this year, there is even a case they skated better than Gilles & Poirier, atleast in the RD part, so to finish behind Fear & Gibson was a slap in the face. I think there is a huge political push behind them and they are going to be on the podium sooner rather than later, whether through teams retiring (likely anyway IMO) or just passing some of them. Plus they are still young and talented so will likely legitimately improve further in some areas, in addition to the obvious huge politicing and push behind them.
I think by the time the next Games roll around the Canadian team will be all "young" teams. FB/S are now 34/32 and seem to have injuries each year to deal with - which is pretty common as skaters get older. I think if both teams skate next year that will be their last year.The current situation is super interesting, as all of the top 5 teams minus Fear & Gibson are getting pretty old. Least of those 4 being Gilles & Poirier, but they are the ones with the biggest question marks about motivation to continue. So a huge question of ho much of the current top 5 (minus Fear & Gibson) even hang in for 2026, and the ones that do if they are even still in good enough shape and up there or not. It will be interesting to follow particularly the top 3 teams, if they stay, and how much of contention any of the ones who do stay even are by 2026.
Fear & Gibson already seem like the anointed ones by the ISU for the next Games but we will see.
Then you have the younger teams like Green & Parsons, Lajoie & Lagha, Taschlerova & Taschler, and if they return Hawayek & Baker, who are already making their way up nicely. Green & Parsons were a strong 6th at worlds this year, and Lajoie & Lagha who have been outscoring them all season likely would have been in that spot instead had they been at worlds, so can already be expected to do very well next year.
Then the question if anyone returns but I think that is very unlikely. Papdakis & Cizeron are the only small chances, and I think even they are a long shot.
Anyway this is the first quad ever I can think of in ice dance where almost all the top 5 were near retirement age/point already, and a question to how many will even last the quad. It will make it super interesting how it plays out from here.
It could be my personal bias but I do think of the oldish teams Guignard & Fabbri are the most likely to stay in for 2026 (mostly because it is a home Olympics, not sure this would be the case otherwise), and probably followed by Fournier Beaudry & Sorensen. I think the Danadians though it is mostly whether they have an opening to be Canadian #1 for 2026. So essentialy I only see them staying for 2026 if both Gilles & Poirier retire by then, and if they can stay ahead of Lajoie & Lagha, and both of those things happening might not be great odds for them. I think they know they have no real realistic chance of big medals until they are Canadian #1.
I think by the time the next Games roll around the Canadian team will be all "young" teams. FB/S are now 34/32 and seem to have injuries each year to deal with - which is pretty common as skaters get older. I think if both teams skate next year that will be their last year.
Soucisse & Firus are currently 28 and 29 years old. They would be 31/32 at the next Olympics. I don't think they qualify as one of the "young" teams (even if we use quotations).Sadly one of them won't be Soucisse & Firus even then. I am pretty sure we will never see them at a major event again. Almost surprised they are continuing at this point. I remember how promising they once seemed.
I kind of feel that they are similar to Belbin/Agosto as in both teams left a very strong, successful school for a fresh POV elsewhere but it didn't really translate into results for either of them. In the case of S/F I think it was always going to be a struggle no matter where they went (or stayed).
If you consider a silver medal at Worlds and a 4th (should've been 3rd) at the Olympics to not be "results" ....
I guess you could argue they were worried about being passed over for the younger Canton teams, which ended up happening at the 2010 Olympics but things looks pretty bright at 2009 Worlds when they won silver over them after placing 4th at 2008 Worlds behind V/M. But those programs…I don't think B/A intended to switch for those results.
I'm glad they moved, though, if only because Linichuk and Karpanosov worked on Belbin's strength and helped her to understand that muscle was her friend. (And Agosto's back's friend.)
They fell behind the two Canton teams they trained with and stayed behind them after the move.If you consider a silver medal at Worlds and a 4th (should've been 3rd) at the Olympics to not be "results" ....
No, they moved training facilities, defeated both teams at the L.A. Worlds, and were eventually passed & defeated by said teams. As was the rest of the planet.They fell behind the two Canton teams they trained with and stayed behind them after the move.
They should have gotten silver to me.B/A are the 2010 Olympic bronze medalists in my heart, so they did have some success with Linnie.
I have to rewatch very carefully, but I remember thinking Faella/Scali should have placed higher and probably medaled too.They should have gotten silver to me.
Golden Spin--Carreira & Ponomarenko defeated Reed & Ambrulevicius (split dances) (I can't find the protocols so not sure if there was/was not a fall).
Thank you! I wondered if someone might resolve that mystery for me.Fall on the Choreographic Sliding Movement in the FD.
Protocol is here: https://villa-madison.com/gs2022/FSKXICEDANCE----------FNL-000100--_JudgesDetailsperSkater.pdfThank you! I wondered if someone might resolve that mystery for me.
It's not spin city when people are just providing information and a different take in a mostly respectful way. When did calling other people "sensitive" become an accepted response to people proffering a different opinion than somebody else? I mean, who's sensitive in that case?It's like spin city in here...
For the sensitive fans, I like B/A. I wasn't trying to insult them.
I stand by my opinion. They had fallen behind V/M prior to the move at 2008 Worlds.
They were behind both D/W and V/M heading into the 2010 Olympics.
Those clearly weren't the results they were hoping for when they moved coaches in 2008.
2009 Worlds isn't the flex some think it is.
The only way to get your opinion respected is by talking about eggs on the faces, I think.It's not spin city when people are just providing information and a different take in a mostly respectful way. When did calling other people "sensitive" become an accepted response to people proffering a different opinion than somebody else? I mean, who's sensitive in that case?
The 1980 Olympic dance field was small: only 12 teams. 4 of them returned in 1984: Torvill & Dean (5th --> 1st), Blumberg & Seibert (7th --> 4th), Bestemianova & Bukin (8th --> 2nd), and Barber & Slater (12th --> 6th).As far as I can tell, the last & only time a full Olympic dance podium didn't return for the next Olympic Games was 1984. (Is that accurate? Did none of the 1980 podium compete?) Fusar-Poli & Margaglio did not make the podium in 2006, but they were there. Ditto with Belbin & Agosto in 2010.
Now this is a spicy take, say more please.They should have gotten silver to me.
I have to rewatch very carefully, but I remember thinking Faella/Scali should have placed higher and probably medaled too.
I think that it is a bad move on their part. They had great choreos so far but Zhulin is circling the drain, creatively speaking.If Russians are allowed I think Stepanova Bukin will make a breakthrough now that they’ve made the move to Zhulin
Thank you. None from the podium, as I figured.The 1980 Olympic dance field was small: only 12 teams. 4 of them returned in 1984: Torvill & Dean (5th --> 1st), Blumberg & Seibert (7th --> 4th), Bestemianova & Bukin (8th --> 2nd), and Barber & Slater (12th --> 6th).
Soucisse & Firus are currently 28 and 29 years old. They would be 31/32 at the next Olympics. I don't think they qualify as one of the "young" teams (even if we use quotations).
I kind of feel that they are similar to Belbin/Agosto as in both teams left a very strong, successful school for a fresh POV elsewhere but it didn't really translate into results for either of them. In the case of S/F I think it was always going to be a struggle no matter where they went (or stayed).