Aren’t the judges identified by number and then you read their scores straight down? I know that all the judges are identified as “ISU”, but isn’t Judge 4 the JPN judge?
ETA: are you saying it’s each individual highest score that gets thrown out? If so, in this that wouldn’t make a difference because JPN gave VM a perfect protocol - all +3s and 10s, which the CAN judge did not do. So JPN’s scores could be thrown out entirely.
The short answer is:
1) the lowest and highest PCS mark for each skill are thrown out regardless of which judge gave it
2) those remaining scores are then added together and an average is found for each skill
3) the total per skill score is added to obtain a total.
4) That scores is then factored either by 80% for the SD or 120% in the FD
5) The country of each judge can be found amongst the ISU data
For example: PC
Judges: 1-CAN- 2-RUS 3-UKR 4-FRA 5-JPN 6-TUR 7-ITA 8-USA 9-ISR
SS: 9.50 10.00 9.75 9.75 9.50 9.75 10.00 9.50 9.75
1) the lowest and highest scores are dropped
SS:
9.50 10.00 9.75 9.75 9.50 9.75 10.00 9.50 9.75
--> Highest 10: RUS &ITA so choose one
--> Lowest 9.5: CAN & JPN & USA, choose one.
I merely used the first two and have them in bold/red
2) add remaining scores 9.75 + 9.75 + 9.50 + 9.75 + 10.00+ 9.50+ 9.75 =
68.00
divide 68/7 =
9.71
This is done for each component and they are then added together and are multiplied by 80%
So in this example PC received the following Component scores for the SD
SS = 9.71
TR = 9.71
PE = 9.82
CO = 9.89
IN = 9.89
TOTAL = 49.04
80% -->
39.22 (please take now that when you use an actual calculator, the total might be a couple of 100's off so I use the official totals from the protocols)
The GOE for each element is similarly done once a judge has assigned a score to those skaters.
Hope this helps a bit.