No-Longer-Prince Andrew

Agree, and it's puzzling in so many ways, and yet maybe not. She wouldn't be the first mother who even when confronted with undeniable facts that her child was a bad person stuck by him anyway. Why? Maybe guilt on her part, maybe she blamed his father for his bad behaviour and thought she had to be the one to love him anyway. Maybe the Queen herself had put up with so much - so many rumours over the years about Philip, plus of course Charles and Camilla's long time affair - because she thought she had to. The monarchy has a long history of open affairs, illegitimate children etc etc. And Harry's own record, while nowhere near Andrew's, is not exactly perfect either, and yet everyone stuck by him until he didn't want to stick by them any more.

It does seem clear she hoped it would blow over like every other scandal, gave him the Lodge to keep him close by, took him off public duty so he wouldn't get in more trouble, privately scolded him when he did, and kept loving him as a mother if not a queen. And hasn't a lot of it only come out since she died?

Families can be complicated, and never truly understood I believe unless you're part of it.
Or maybe Elizabeth felt, like so many other rich & powerful families feel, that her family was above the law & anything distasteful could be suppressed with that money & power or, In her case, by their status.
 
I hear Andrew still maintains his innocence. The question is innocent of what, i.e., in his mind, he may rationalize that the girls were willing, paid, knew what they were doing, etc. Somehow that seems even worse.........
 
I hear Andrew still maintains his innocence. The question is innocent of what, i.e., in his mind, he may rationalize that the girls were willing, paid, knew what they were doing, etc. Somehow that seems even worse.........
He maintains an appalling level of cognitive dissonance.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe Elizabeth felt, like so many other rich & powerful families feel, that her family was above the law & anything distasteful could be suppressed with that money & power or, In her case, by their status.
IIRC, during lockdown, Elizabeth sat alone at her husband's funeral, not near other family -- because that was the law that others were expected to obey.
 
Andrew was stripped of his military affiliations and titles (a big deal as he had an impressive military career), his royal patronages, the ability to undertake any public duties on behalf of the queen, and his HRH title during the last years of his mother's life. He also was not present to celebrate publicly the Queen's jubilee with the rest of her family.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information