You are assuming that the authorities involved will care about the victim and be respectful towards her or him. This is unfortunately often not the case for Indigenous people, who are commonly seen as inferior to whites.
- if immediate authorities do not care, given there are relevant laws, make them care and/or go to the next level.
- people can "see and think" about others whatever they want, as long as they don't act upon it.
- the "attacker" family broke several laws (as i see it), which address not only the group of Native Indians or ethnically motivated attacks in general; they started an unprovoked verbal and physical attack against a group of people, who are in addition are minors. Indians, martians, green or purple.... a group of people initiated and conducted an offensive and harmful behavior against others. That is covered by law, and should be used to hold attackers accountable. In order to hold attackers accountable, one must a) document it, b) contact authorities. There is NO other way, unless one wants to fight back, physically or verbally, depending on the situation.... a method you do not approve of, obviously.
Many simply don't care. And, many have the impression that Indigenous people should just 'pull themselves up by the bootstraps. . .get jobs. . .get with the program'. They don't understand that Indigenous people don't have the same individualistic, materialistic mentality that characterizes western societies in general. Plus, their understandings of justice and well-being (closely tied to nature) are distinct from the typical western understandings.
While i believe that "individualistic, materialistic mentality" is good, i also believe that any group of people, especially the one that was "here first", has a right to exist and to live in its primordial conditions, if that is what they want, and should fight for and insist on the rights to do so (demand independence and more territories, keeping their own more collectivist society structure, hunt deer, live off the fields and forest, practice native medicine and social rituals, etc.) Different social structures should be able to exist side by side without interfering with each other.
There are tribes in the Amazon and other parts of the world, in various stages of evolution measured against "western societies", which exist without interference from "western/westernized" segments of population, and live according to their systems. They have a right to do so. But if these groups or individuals chose to integrate into "another form of society", they should adopt basic and essential rules and social norms of society while keeping their own traditions and ways of life (that are allowed by law) in private settings. That means being proactive in getting education, finding work, using laws properly, when jerks (and i mean it) attack them without a reason (or for some idiotic personal reason).
There are two choices for those of "non-western culture". either demand your space and live accordingly, or adopt the western culture. And it's not about "western" vs. "native". it's general: if culture A wants to stay culture A, demand your own space. If culture A wants to be culture B, adopt essential elements of culture B (and keep yours private). You can't have it both ways, live as chose by culture A, and yet demand benefits of culture B.
Shakers have and live in such form of a community, doing fine and there are no conflicts with western society, overall.
We all deserve respect, love and dignity and there are people in this world who wouldnt know what those are if it smacked them in the face. I feel terrible to that family. No one should have to endure those kinds of hurtful words and actions.
Every person deserves respect and consideration of one's civil rights (and that's sometimes involves respect and dignity). Love is a) subjective and b) not a right. I stick by a phrase that you can not and should not legislate love, sympathy, empathy, passion and compassion. It does not matter if Person A dislikes Person B for whatever reason, as long as there are laws preventing A from direct physical and financial harm to B.
I assume there are a ton of people the attend the show. A- Where the **** were the kids parents when they were acting like that? B- Why didn't anyone else say something? C- Why didn't the parents turn around and call security and stand up for them selves. (not blaming the victims but just saying if that happened to me i'd be the first one to get up in their faces). There must of been many many people witnessing this and shame on them for not standing up for the situation as well. I would really like to know if they found out who the bullies were and if anything is going to be done about this.
It was dark probably, "other people" were watching the show, from distance the situation could have looked like "kids fussing around". But! i absolutely agree with you on what i highlighted in your post.
I think Tinami is speaking from the persoective of a white person who has never encountered a similar situation.
Have you heard of "Jews and discrimination" in former Soviet Union? But don't let me short-circuit "the board" with a new subject...

Look.... extrapolation is not your forte; stick to repeating like a parrot all the PC-approved proclamations and you’ll do much better.