Coronation of King Charles III

Based on what a I just heard
In the Bill of Rights of 1689 Parliament declared that no future monarch could be a Catholic or be married to a Catholic. This provision was reaffirmed in the 1701 Act of Settlement and remains in force to this day.
 
Based on what a I just heard
In the Bill of Rights of 1689 Parliament declared that no future monarch could be a Catholic or be married to a Catholic. This provision was reaffirmed in the 1701 Act of Settlement and remains in force to this day.
Having worked for the Catholics for a couple of years, I approve of this.
 
I do support King Charles....


But his coronation is way too long.. Queen Elizabeth was 5 hours.

And another is the thing is about both being double adultery ...

 
Last edited:
I wonder what Prince George is thinking, knowing that one day (hopefully far in the future) it will be him in that position.
I was wondering the same. He certainly looked like it was dawning on him that he'd be doing the same one day.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top