Coronation of King Charles III

Based on what a I just heard
In the Bill of Rights of 1689 Parliament declared that no future monarch could be a Catholic or be married to a Catholic. This provision was reaffirmed in the 1701 Act of Settlement and remains in force to this day.
 
Based on what a I just heard
In the Bill of Rights of 1689 Parliament declared that no future monarch could be a Catholic or be married to a Catholic. This provision was reaffirmed in the 1701 Act of Settlement and remains in force to this day.
Having worked for the Catholics for a couple of years, I approve of this.
 
I do support King Charles....


But his coronation is way too long.. Queen Elizabeth was 5 hours.

And another is the thing is about both being double adultery ...

 
Last edited:
I wonder what Prince George is thinking, knowing that one day (hopefully far in the future) it will be him in that position.
I was wondering the same. He certainly looked like it was dawning on him that he'd be doing the same one day.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information