I swear, half of trying to follow this sport is parsing technical notifications...
Looking at the 2026 Bye/Advancement criteria document, I first got the impression that Patrick Blackwell could get a retroactive bye to nationals (if such a thing could even apply retroactively). So, let assume he goes to Eastern Sectionals and places in the top 4 (not hard to assume).
Furthermore, Patrick is unofficially scheduled to compete in Tallinn at the end of November. That will be his 3rd international which theoretically earns him a bye. I think he's pas the point of paying his own way to competitions, so let's just assume that this is a funded competition for him. If so, would that mean the 5th place Eastern finisher now gets to go to Jr. Nats because a bye winner can't preclude a lower finisher if they compete in the NQS Final?
Ok, but now here is the big question. Would Patrick even qualify for a bye, because the list of approved competitions for a bye is under the header of "Challenger Series/International Competitions", and we all know that a CS event is senior only. So now we're left to parse "International Competitions". I had previously assumed that meant any international competition, but lately I've learned that this generic-looking term might not be so generic. In the ISU parlance, there are "IC"/"International Competitions" and "JIC"/"Junior International Competitions".
Confusing the issue further, they document goes on to specifically exclude the Junior Cranberry Cup event. So, now I'm confused again, if "International Competitions" doesn't automatically imply senior-level events then this explicit exclusion is unnecessary. So then, does Tallinn earn Patrick a bye (after-the-fact)?
Please help a guy out. Any opinions? Are only lawyers allowed to follow this sport?