My meaning was that Gibson had no incentive to learn > than the current compulsory for the season once he began dance since the ISU seemed to be watering down compulsories' impact on scoring by putting it in the rhythm or short dance instead of in its' own segment. And he has no incentive at all to learn them after they removed them entirely. He is still a great skater. Compulsory judging could of course be as political as any part of dance, but even a no-technik viewer like me could see obvious quality differences between couples - speed, size of pattern, depth of lobe, etc. At least in singles, skaters still have to work on the edges they used to work on in compulsories, in order to get > points for footwork. And of course to get a more solid foundation for jumps, spins, stroking, and speed. Good dance coaches can teach good edges w/o compulsories, but I still think they are a good tool to differentiate between teams.