Who knows if Skate Canada would even be able to get a good deal like that.
Seriously? You don't think there are hotels in Canada that are full of empty rooms and eager to host a big competition? I find that hard to believe. In fact, I will state categorically that it would have been possible to hold Canadian Nationals in another location without SC losing their shirts.
If the event be held safely, and the organization hosting has the financial resources to do so then fine, go ahead, but Skate Canada really doesn't have those resources.
So Skate Canada has fewer resources than FFSG? Or any of the smaller European NGBs that put on a Nationals?
If so, that's another reason their leadership has failed.
Those of you outside Canada who really don't know about all of the conditions in each of the provinces (or regions within provinces) across this great country should, perhaps, limit your comments... [just a polite Canadian suggestion ???]
I look forward to your lack of comments about Russia, Japan, the US, and any other country you don't live in.
Nationals was scheduled to be held in a
Province that most likely was not going to allow it to happen no matter what.
Exactly. So was US Nationals. (It was to be held in my area and we're one of the most cautious in the US.) And guess what USFS did? They moved it ahead of time to a place that was less likely to cancel on them. The fact that SC did nothing except wring their hands and cancel at the last minute because "they had no choice" even though they had many choices but just didn't pursue them does not speak well of their leadership.
I am somewhat amused by the idea that USFS is rolling in dough compared to SC btw. USFS is not a rich organization. They are a largely volunteer organization with few paid staff just like SC. SC has sponsors just like USFS and could have worked with them just like USFS. You say that USFS gives more money to its elite skaters but USFS puts a lot less money into recreational skaters compared to SC. Who pays the expenses for their synchro teams doesn't say which organization has more money only what they prioritize.
I am also not that impressed with how Canada (or Australia for that matter) is handling C19 now. Yes, they shut down early and hard and I approve of that. But after you get the v1rus under control, you are supposed to open up and then control outbreaks with contact tracing and quarantining. Both of these countries say they are only trying to suppress but they are pursuing a de facto strategy of elimination. Which is only possible if the entire world is doing that or you close your borders to anyone for a long, long time like years.
There are way more ways to handle a pand*mic wrong than right. You can not shut down enough in the beginning (or at all) like Sweden, Russia, and a lot of the US. You can shut down hard but then open up too early (California). You can shut down hard but not open back up when cases are low and can be handled via quarantines (Canada and Australia). And probably a few other ways to screw up that I'm not thinking of.
There are a few countries that shut down hard, built up contact tracing and other resources, and then opened up and when there is an outbreak they are on it like white on rice and everyone impacted gets quarantined so it doesn't spread. Those countries are now having large gatherings
without everyone being vaccinated and their economies are chugging along. The rest of us are screwed.