allezfred
Mean Spirited
- Messages
- 68,101
Good to know it's not just US healthcare that is f*cked, but also your education system. 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the tip of the iceberg. Our public education system is completely unfair. Funding is based on local districts rich kids in rich districts get way more funding than the poor. And this isn’t just about race rural areas get screwed.Good to know it's not just US healthcare that is f*cked, but also your education system.![]()
Never going to happen when schools make $$$$$$$ from top athletic programs. Minor sports, they just keep because of Title IX. Football and basketball are money makers and increase alumni funding for top schools. Now, that being said, the Ivies don't usually fit into that group.This. I’ve been railing for years that the NCAA should be abolished and basketball and football should have minor leagues where players get paid. The sham of providing an education to the big-sport athletes has long been obvious.
My nephew went to Williams partially because he was an excellent cross-country skier and my friend’s son went to Pitt as a swimmer. Both had the grades and scores to get in anyway but scholarship $ at Pitt was helpful and Williams is as hard to get into as the Ivys. I still oppose athletic criteria for admission.
That's true for universities in major conferences in Division I. The others (like the Ivies and schools in Division III), not so much. Yes, students are recruited for their athletic ability and it gives them an advantage in admissions, but sports at those schools are not revenue-producing. Many do have a "Friends of Athletics" or similar alumni affinity group that fundraises for the sports programs, but there are affinity groups covering other academic and extracurricular areas too. Affinity groups do boost fundraising overall, so I suppose there is a small monetary benefit to having strong athletic programs in Division III.Even at small schools, Athletics play a huge role in the finances of the University. Alumni give more when the home team wins. Sports teams raise the profile of the school and allow them to be more selective with their applicants.
But as has been said by others, that isn't what this scandal is about. It's about doing illegal things and cheating on exams and lying.As some have already said though, is this really that new? Parents (and other relatives, and potentially people inside who really really want someone on their sports team who is otherwise unqualified for example?) doing whatever they can to get their kids into the best schools, whether it's outright bribes or making donations or pulling strings to get their application higher on list and using whatever alumni/legacy connections they have to make it happen?
:ha: That was my thought too!Oh, and in the case of Felicity Huffman's and William Macy's daughters, the older one got the help, they apparently think the younger one will be fine and didn't do it for her. So there's a big bill for family counseling coming.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/us/college-admissions-cheating-scandal.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
I wonder what entirely separate EVILLE things the target was suspected of doing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/...tion=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=ArticleAccording to the authorities, William Singer, the head of a college preparatory business and the founder of the charity, met with Ms. Huffman and Mr. Macy in their Los Angeles home and explained how he could help them. Mr. Singer, who has pleaded guilty and is cooperating with investigators — he is identified as “cooperating witness 1” in the indictments — said he could arrange for their daughter’s SAT proctor to secretly correct her wrong answers and boost her score. “CW-1 has advised investigators that Huffman and her spouse agreed to the plan,” the indictment said.
Right, this scandal seems to have been the admissions methodology for the medium rich who can't endow a building or aren't legacy families. But organized cheating on SATs, fake athletics, bribery, please.Color me cynical, but I actually laughed when I read "There can be no separate college admission for wealthy,"
Does she realize that that means "Expel me, please" in academic speech?“But I’m gonna go in and talk to my deans and everyone, and hope that I can try and balance it all. But I do want the experience of like game days, partying, I don’t really care about school, as you guys all know.”
But as has been said by others, that isn't what this scandal is about. It's about doing illegal things and cheating on exams and lying.
She also told me that the President of her university was asked by a rich alum to get his son into the school and the President's reply was: if we did that, this wouldn't be a school you wanted your son to go to.
Does she realize that that means "Expel me, please" in academic speech?![]()
I do like the idea of student-athletes from disadvantaged backgrounds getting an opportunity to receive an education. It can be tough to excel academically coming out of a school with less funding and educational offerings, and minor league sports pay very little and the likelihood of a major league payday are slim - or at least that's the case in baseball.This. I’ve been railing for years that the NCAA should be abolished and basketball and football should have minor leagues where players get paid. The sham of providing an education to the big-sport athletes has long been obvious.
Right, I went to Hunter College because I got financial aid and could afford it. I was an A HS student who did not standardize test well so my SATs weren't over the top plus I worked for years before going to college. Didn't apply anywhere else. Didn't try to transfer after getting some As. Got into law school, have had the same jobs as a bunch of Harvard and Penn and UVA and Stanford grads. I'm sure I could have made it academically, but I just fit in much better at Hunter - we were all working and going to school at the same time. Lots of undergrads my age (late 20s, early 30s). Normal stuff. I loved Hunter.https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.democratandchronicle.com/amp/3148975002
My favorite part is she talks in the end about a kid who scored super high on his tests and said no to the Ivies because he wanted no debt and to be financially responsible. The whole educational system in this country is a mess.
This being said I knew a girl top five out of a class of like 800 great test scores chose to go to state school not even top one because full ride.
I'm a proctor - I do not have access to any answer keys, and am appalled that a proctor would intentionally change a students answers.It seems like there needs to be a separate investigation of the College Board. How would a test proctor have the correct answers to the entire SAT test in his/her possession? I suppose the person could be a genius who would know all the answers but that seems unlikely.
I remember reading an article years ago about a scandal involving community college transfers at Yale and maybe a couple other top schools. The applicants had paid off someone in their school's registrar's office to alter their official transcript. I think the scheme started to unravel when professors saw the students' actual work and wondered how they could have been admitted to the university in the first place. And I also remember reading about various schemes where wealthy students paid someone else to take the SAT for them. Cheating has been around for a long time. But I would imagine it doesn't just exist in the U.S.
Not anymore. Its undergraduate acceptance rate for 2018 was 13%.Gee, I thought anyone could get into USC undergrad...……..
I know that students paying someone to take the exam for them has been happening forever. But I assumed that was a somewhat isolated event.And I also remember reading about various schemes where wealthy students paid someone else to take the SAT for them. Cheating has been around for a long time. But I would imagine it doesn't just exist in the U.S.
I was responding to another post that I quoted that suggested that the elite network method of getting into schools is a newish thing, because otherwise yes, this is beyond that. Similar roots though.
Seems to me this is what she might want. This might in fact work nicely for her - kicked out of school for nothing she personally did, still gets to party with her friends on game day and all that, more free time for her burgeoning whateveryoucallit career, takes on the role of poor victim of parents who loved her soooo much, and of course, her name is in the news, which is what people like that seem to care about most, aside from money and freebies and the lifestyle of course.
She has been arrested; he hasn't.Btw, I want to know why all the articles say Felicity Huffman did this instead of what really happened: William Macy and Felicity Huffman did this. His name is often not mentioned at all not even in the story but he's just as guilty as she is.
Public figure though he may be, for the media to say he was just as guilty as his wife would be to risk liability for libel.Why was Macy kept (semi-)anonymous in the complaint? Roiphe explained that when a conspirator isn’t named, it could be evidence that they had cooperated with the investigation. Or prosecutors could simply not be ready to charge them yet. (On Tuesday afternoon, Macy turned up in court alongside his lawyer.)
The problem is that the majority of college athletes don't fall into this category. Most of them are white and, if not exactly wealthy, are at least middle class.I do like the idea of student-athletes from disadvantaged backgrounds getting an opportunity to receive an education. It can be tough to excel academically coming out of a school with less funding and educational offerings, and minor league sports pay very little and the likelihood of a major league payday are slim - or at least that's the case in baseball.
The media never says anyone is guilty until they are actually found guilty or cop a plea. They could certain have mentioned his name in the articles and most of them didn't. I was assuming sexism but if he was semi-anonymous in the complaint, it was probably just laziness. Or maybe a combination of both.Public figure though he may be, for the media to say he was just as guilty as his wife would be to risk liability for libel.
Btw, I want to know why all the articles say Felicity Huffman did this instead of what really happened: William Macy and Felicity Huffman did this. His name is often not mentioned at all not even in the story but he's just as guilty as she is. They are somewhat doing the same with Lori Loughlin. Her name is in the headlines. But they mention the husband in the story and her husband hasn't got the name recognition of William Macy.
If/until Macy is charged we probably won’t hear his name mentioned as much.The problem is that the majority of college athletes don't fall into this category. Most of them are white and, if not exactly wealthy, are at least middle class.
The media never says anyone is guilty until they are actually found guilty or cop a plea. They could certain have mentioned his name in the articles and most of them didn't. I was assuming sexism but if he was semi-anonymous in the complaint, it was probably just laziness. Or maybe a combination of both.
Not to mention, there are 50 people who have been charged and they only show the pictures of the two actresses.![]()
None of this should be surprising.
Never going to happen when schools make $$$$$$$ from top athletic programs.
My mom has been in academia for over 40 years including as a high-level administrator and currently as a professor. She is absolutely shocked. The idea that an SAT official would changes a student's answers after the fact is mind-boggling to both of us. That puts all SAT results of all students under question and could bring down the entire SAT system.
But organized cheating on SATs, fake athletics, bribery, please.
“But I’m gonna go in and talk to my deans and everyone, and hope that I can try and balance it all. But I do want the experience of like game days, partying, I don’t really care about school, as you guys all know.”
Btw, I want to know why all the articles say Felicity Huffman did this instead of what really happened: William Macy and Felicity Huffman did this. His name is often not mentioned at all not even in the story but he's just as guilty as she is. They are somewhat doing the same with Lori Loughlin. Her name is in the headlines. But they mention the husband in the story and her husband hasn't got the name recognition of William Macy.
I know - the default is to think of football and basketball players, and there probably is more diversity there. But obviously you have sports like lacrosse and hockey and rowing which are much less diverse.The problem is that the majority of college athletes don't fall into this category. Most of them are white and, if not exactly wealthy, are at least middle class.