The discussion about "weight and body" today, thanks to PC-trends and trying to make everyone equal and "empower the weak, destroy the powerful", is pretty much reflected by a sculpture in Sweden.....

... those "lucky to be born thin or aka starving skinny ones, that so few people can be naturally" vs. "real women have curves, so no matter how huge you are, you're beauuuuuuutiful, because to be thin one must have a fortune and/or right genetics"..
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/LA2-vx06-konsthallen-skulptur.jpg
Those who are not born to look like models, can become mathematicians, NASA scientists, doctors, professors.....
Those who are not born with body types (even with hard work and maintenance) to be Sasha Cohens, Trusovas, Alysia Lius, and can't do quads and 3A, should either find another sport or activity, or a accept their 2nd tier results.
Each area of activity has "types" which are more likely to succeed. Either you challenge them, if you don't have the merrits, or find another activity.
Brainwashing people into equality for all, when the criteria for success is based on "merit", or any form of social engineering that fights one's natural trends, will lead to hindrance in evolutionary process, in life or in various venues.
Lighter people, or those with a certain proportion of muscles and physical characteristics, can do better jumps in skating. One is either thin and light (given other abilities) or one coordinates "physics" to do quads and 3A.
Either you have it or work on it, or you don't... and no need to curb the ones who have it all by nature or by work, like limiting quads, and starting a campaign against youngsters who are learning quads and 3A.... Evolution.
Those creatures who made tools such Acheulean handaxes became humans, those who did not remained monkeys.. and i don't want a lecture on Orangutans and Chimpanzees and the 1.5% and 3.7% elements of neanderthal's DNA in "certain" breeds of humans or refs to evil Darwin or Nietzsche..