jeffisjeff
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,858
I haven't been watching DWTS, and have no idea how they handled their face-off, but...
I have always thought that seeding in tournaments, as well as early round byes, were ways to reward performance in the regular season/preliminary rounds. If team A ends the regular season/preliminary round with a better record than team B, they earn themselves a better seeding in the tournament. That seems quite fair to me - why should teams A and B be treated equally when one has performed better than the other? It might have the side benefit of (typically) keeping team A alive in the tournament longer, but I don't think that is the intent.
I have always thought that seeding in tournaments, as well as early round byes, were ways to reward performance in the regular season/preliminary rounds. If team A ends the regular season/preliminary round with a better record than team B, they earn themselves a better seeding in the tournament. That seems quite fair to me - why should teams A and B be treated equally when one has performed better than the other? It might have the side benefit of (typically) keeping team A alive in the tournament longer, but I don't think that is the intent.
It's scrutinized every year for it's rigged-ness against smaller schools. The choice of teams that get to play is made by a cabal that only provide semi-transparency into the factors that are reviewed for decision making -and several of those factors are subjective, not stats.
