I cut your post to answer the two different sentences. I didn't find anything offensive at all in what you wrote. Even if I had, what does it have to do with separating sentences to reply ?
True but it's also quite rare that medals are awarded to totally undeserving athletes. So, generally speaking, that's why athletes with a long history of medals are better considered than those who, for now, have won less. Since one of the couple we're talking about is now more or less (well, far more than less) retired and won't medal anymore when the other one has still plenty of time to collect more gold, it's not yet time for a fair comparison anyway. As I read your original post, what I mainly saw was "who cares about medals" and actually a lot of people indeed do, so that's what I tried to explain. I haven't read the entire thread nor many posts before yours, sorry.
Well, I'm not not pulling my hair during competition and I'm not often here. And I haven't been snarky nor unpleasant with you so I'm not sure I get where your stiff tone and sarcasm come from. I don't think we have interacted before. Isn' it possible to tell you something (on which it seems we in fact agree) without you jumping on your high horse ? "Sans dec'"