Pink Cats
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 443
Paul's shirt would be fairly accurate if it was white linen.
The late rule change to the partner separation catching more teams out. I would think that issue will be addressed very quickly over the next few weeks.British Judge put Fear & Gibson in 1st.
USA had Zingas & Kolesnik in 3rd over the Browns.
USA had Reed & Ambrulevicius in 6th behind all the US teams.
USA is the only judge not to give any 5s in the Free Dance.
Reed & Ambrulevicius got ! on their choreosteps, losing 2+ points. Their score would have been ~119 without the error.
Same for Zingas & Kolesnik, ! on the choreo steps. Score would have been ~115 without the error.
What does ! mean....it didn't go end to end?Reed & Ambrulevicius got ! on their choreosteps, losing 2+ points. Their score would have been ~119 without the error.
Same for Zingas & Kolesnik, ! on the choreo steps. Score would have been ~115 without the error.
Oh, but it was all choreographed, including scared face. A deep commentary on gettin’ back up and fightin’ back.Those +GOEs when he almost dropped her going into the rotational lift are RIDICULOUS.
Yes, Piper was singing in English and Paul in French. Love it.Nice to see Piper singing anthem, think Paul is singing it in French
Pl. | Name | Nation | TSS = | TES + | PCS + | CO | PR | SK | Ded. - | StN. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Piper GILLES / Paul POIRIER | CAN | 131.46 | 74.60 | 56.86 | 9.50 | 9.50 | 9.43 | 0.00 | #10 | |
2 | Lilah FEAR / Lewis GIBSON | GBR | 126.04 | 70.98 | 55.06 | 9.21 | 9.25 | 9.07 | 0.00 | #9 | |
3 | Allison REED / Saulius AMBRULEVICIUS | LTU | 116.41 | 64.33 | 52.08 | 8.79 | 8.68 | 8.57 | 0.00 | #8 | |
4 | Oona BROWN / Gage BROWN | USA | 113.71 | 64.43 | 49.28 | 8.21 | 8.11 | 8.32 | 0.00 | #7 | |
5 | Emilea ZINGAS / Vadym KOLESNIK | USA | 112.71 | 63.49 | 49.22 | 8.29 | 8.25 | 8.07 | 0.00 | #6 | |
6 | Eva PATE / Logan BYE | USA | 109.34 | 63.40 | 46.94 | 7.93 | 7.79 | 7.75 | 1.00 | #5 | |
7 | Jennifer JANSE van RENSBURG / Benjamin STEFFAN | GER | 106.38 | 60.04 | 46.34 | 7.89 | 7.71 | 7.57 | 0.00 | #3 | |
8 | Alicia FABBRI / Paul AYER | CAN | 105.03 | 59.47 | 45.56 | 7.68 | 7.64 | 7.46 | 0.00 | #4 | |
9 | Molly LANAGHAN / Dmitre RAZGULAJEVS | CAN | 102.82 | 58.68 | 44.14 | 7.43 | 7.46 | 7.18 | 0.00 | #2 | |
10 | Shiyue WANG / Xinyu LIU | CHN | 95.95 | 52.23 | 43.72 | 7.36 | 7.25 | 7.25 | 0.00 | #1 |
This, it basically means the element didn't meet the requirements of the element in some way. Here's what the rulebook lays out for assigning a ! to the choreo steps:What does ! mean....it didn't go end to end?
Which Mark explained and I appreciated it.In assuming this is F/G-- she did save the twizzle and she fulfilled the requirements to get a level 4.
At this point in the season, I agree that Gilles/Poirier's program has the best potential to be truly great at worlds. I think I'd prefer a more period costume look, though.I’m in love with Piper and Paul’s FD. They come out in pink pastel soft lacy outfits that actually look more late 20th-early 21st century, and you think they’re doing a soft, lyrical piece to a modern love ballad. NOPE! Love that. Loved every moment of their FD. I want it to win Worlds!
I also agree that the Browns' dance has real potential. They've done well with skating to popular music like "Nothing Else Matters", but this program is giving them a chance to develop more of a emotional connection to the program and theme, which isn't necessarily easy to do as a sibling team.The Browns were so much better here than they were at Skate America even with some rough exits here and there. I think I’ll be looking forward to seeing this dance moving forward.
I will never give up advocating for a judging system that better balances the reward of theatrics versus the craft of bladework.Fear/Gibson will just be what they are and no use complaining about wanting them to be something else or being mad that this judging system rewards their style of programs.
why
. They dance soft most of the time. They don`t do agressive, fast. Some couples I dislike because their `dance`look like bench presses with the woman thrown around - sort of like Scottish Highland Games. G/P in order to come close to brating C/B need to incorporate more aggresive, angular material into their Free. Even if they aren`t totally comfortable with it.This, it basically means the element didn't meet the requirements of the element in some way. Here's what the rulebook lays out for assigning a ! to the choreo steps:
The last one was a late addition and got a few teams at Skate America. For the teams here, I'd have to rewatch to see why. Nothing really stood out to me.
- both of the partners are more than 2 meters from one of the barriers
- a retrogression is performed
- pattern is repeated as exactly the same as the Step Sequence, even if the ChSt is skated first
- partners are more than two arms length apart
Getting back to this, just rewatched the top Free Dances:What does ! mean....it didn't go end to end?
Interestingly, I was reading from someone who was there that said while they enjoyed z/k, they didn't use the ice well at all. They said that z/k only skated past them once in the entire program, and there were parts of the ice they never even touched. So it seems that your reasoning could be correct if they just aren't covering the ice sheet well anyway.Getting back to this, just rewatched the top Free Dances:
I think Zingas & Kolesnik got an ! on the choreographic steps because they didn't get within two meters of the barrier opposite the judges. It should be noted that if they didn't get an !, they still wouldn't have moved ahead of the Browns. ZingKol would have been within fractions of a point, but not enough to overtake them.
I agree. Reed had a much nicer dress at Nebelhorn. Sleeker, without the cut-outs. Why did she change it?This dress is EXTREMELY unflattering for her.
In German we call this kind of act "verschlimmbessern": You want to improve something, but **** it up epically.I agree. Reed had a much nicer dress at Nebelhorn. Sleeker, without the cut-outs. Why did she change it?
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
I love how there is a word for this in German.In German we call this kind of act "verschlimmbessern": You want to improve something, but **** it up epically.
yes....but easier to do clean twizzles and steps in slow motion.Shouldn’t a Lord of the Dance program be… faster?
quality counts more than quantity. It is a beautiful piece performed with great passion.I love Alicia, this is a team I really like but seem to be in the minority
Going by career results it would be Molly and Dimitri who would be dropped off which might have made bad feelings in the camp as Dimitri is the coach's son. It is also possible that for a while they weren't sure that Piper and Paul would continue. Rumours were going around that they may retire.That would make all three teams Carol Lane teams? That could be one reason.
True...they hardly got to use it and it was very well received at the beginning of last year.I imagine the injury and surgery had a lot to do with the decision to keep it.
Agree. It's the first time I haven't enjoyed watching Fear/Gibson (leaving aside technical issues).Quite honestly they should have made this an exhibition. I didn't even enjoy it in the cheesy way.
Again, agree. I think it might grow on me over the season. Gilles/Poirier skated it well - loved the elegance, lines and use of dance holds, but I'm not sold on it yet. PCS gap between them and Fear/Gibson should have been much bigger.I feel like I should like it more than I actually do. I don’t have it, but I don’t love it? I’m not sure why either. I feel like I’m being told I should and I’m just not there?