Former Lurve Goddess
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,812
Not specifically about skating, but very relevant, CBC investigation into abuse in amateur sport in Canada.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cry me a river.Martin Goulet, the executive director of Water Polo Canada, says it's unfair to hold NSOs accountable for cases of abuse and maltreatment that might take place at local clubs and associations.
"Most NSOs don't have the capacity to do this. They won't do a good job or they're going to drain all their resources into this," Goulet told CBC News.
"And who is going to suffer? It's going to be the athletes at the end of the day, because programs for athletes are already poorly funded."
Provincial/Territorial organizations usually govern the operation of clubs in their respective areas, but there is probably some variation between sports. I know that for example local skating clubs are members of Skate Ontario, local hockey organizations are members of the Ontario Hockey Federation, and local tennis clubs are members of the Ontario Tennis Association.Also, do all NGBs in all sports in Canada only field National teams? Because I'm pretty sure Skate Canada does work at the grassroots and also clubs need to belong to it just like they do in the US with USFS.
That, plus lack of volunteers. People are busy, don't want to, can't afford to, and don't want to go in and get criminal record checks. So, yes they turn a blind eye to the abuse. The only solution is for people to become involved. Is it going to happen? Unlikely.IMO the real culprit is not that there isn't enough money or time to get materials to send to clubs but that people turn a blind eye to abuse for various reasons especially if the abuser and/or victims are producing results. That's a cultural problem.
There are numerous youth organizations in the US that require background checks before adults can work with children. I haven't seen it significantly dampen volunteering.That, plus lack of volunteers. People are busy, don't want to, can't afford to, and don't want to go in and get criminal record checks. So, yes they turn a blind eye to the abuse. The only solution is for people to become involved. Is it going to happen? Unlikely.
There are numerous youth organizations in the US that require background checks before adults can work with children. I haven't seen it significantly dampen volunteering.
Not for those that want to. It's basically just a lack of volunteers for all the reasons I mentioned. It isn't just sports, there is a shortage of volunteers in lots of areas.
Um, part of rooting out abuse is promoting justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. Without JEDI, abusive patriarchal systems remain in place.Hey, there's no time for dealing with "peanuts" like this when they are too occupied with much more important issues like promoting same-sex pairs or gender neutrality in figure skating or re-naming elements for them to be politically-correct.
You gotta respect their choices. #priorities #diversityftw
Um, part of rooting out abuse is promoting justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. Without JEDI, abusive patriarchal systems remain in place.![]()
I completely agree. But I also feel that some NSOs are doing the quick and easy things so they can point to those and say "look how inclusive we are", while not doing anything about the more pervasive and long-standing issues. I would feel more confident if I got the sense that these initial changes were part of a well thought out overall plan that would lead to larger structural changes.
If they can't afford it, then they should go out of business because they will end up paying one way or the other if they do not.I don't completely buy the "NSOs can't afford it" argument. There's a moral question as well as a financial question. If the NSOs are benefiting financially from the performances of their high-level athletes (provincial/federal funding, corporate sponsorships etc) then IMO they have a moral obligation to ensure those athletes aren't being abused or exploited.
For some of the larger NSOs, anyway, they are also paying corporate-level salaries to their top national level staff while expecting clubs and sections to be operated mostly by unpaid volunteers.
If they can't afford it, then they should go out of business because they will end up paying one way or the other if they do not.
I am sure that when allegations of widespread abuse within the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts of America started to emerge, those organizations made similar statements.
The Church (or, rather, its dioceses) ended up selling many buildings to pay for settlements and judgments, and the Boy Scouts went into bankruptcy.
Anyone who is a volunteer in skating here in Australia needs to have a Working with Children check and it is applied. No-one has a problem with it and we accept it as a standard for the sport.There are numerous youth organizations in the US that require background checks before adults can work with children. I haven't seen it significantly dampen volunteering.
It’s a good step but with the lack of actual charging of abusers it is not enough.Anyone who is a volunteer in skating here in Australia needs to have a Working with Children check and it is applied. No-one has a problem with it and we accept it as a standard for the sport.
It’s a good step but with the lack of actual charging of abusers it is not enough.
Yes that’s why I said it’s a good start. Unfortunately what has happened here is they have made that mandatory but it doesn’t deal with the issues or the culture that creates the abuse. Becomes a bit of a cop out.I don't think @Aussie Willy was claiming that it would solve all the problems. But it's better than not having any screening at all.
Yes that’s why I said it’s a good start. Unfortunately what has happened here is they have made that mandatory but it doesn’t deal with the issues or the culture that creates the abuse. Becomes a bit of a cop out.
Im saying the same thing, Screening is important but they need to address the root issuesI don't agree. I don't think any NSO in Canada is using screening as its only way of addressing abuse, or claiming that screening is the only thing that's needed to keep kids safe. Sure, many of the complaint systems etc are ineffective or aren't being used as they were intended to be used, but that doesn't negate the importance of screening.