joubertelegant
Banned Member
- Messages
- 142
I don't know. Doubled Salchow attempts in both programs, QR the triple Salchow had little runout and a hand down on the Axel, and the LP had the poor attempt at the triple Salchow. Her technical marks in the QR were extremely low considering what she put out, but she did skate 2nd in the group.
By 2000, I'm pretty sure the ISU had already established the 'well-balanced' long program guidelines and Maria didn't really have an entire footwork sequence or spiral sequence. That could've also been a factor for some judges, even though Slutskaya really just casually went through most of her non-jump elements (including very minimal revolutions on spins--- only 3 revs on the flying camel!).
We discussed most of this in the retrospective thread, but looking back I'd have no issue with putting Slutskaya a very obvious 4th in the long program. I think it's a real toss-up between Maria and Vanessa for 2nd.
I think with the performances they gave Irina 2nd was right. She had 2 triple lutzes, 6 triples, and several good triple-double combinations. With the botched sequence Maria didn't even have a combination of any sort, only 1 triple lutz, and only 5 triples. Irina was overscored, I cant believe she nearly won over Kwan with that skate which shows if she even did just a triple toe for a 7th triple or had done 6 triples regularly without rearranging she probably wins over Kwan's skate with 7 triples, a triple-triple, and much better artistry, which is a joke, but that is another topic I guess. Still 2nd in the LP was probably fine.
Vanessa's skate was nice but her technique on jumps and spins in general is not as strong as Irina's, one of her lutzes was two footed, and she is sloppy and not a polished skater like Kwan or Maria either, even if her Legends of the Fall was very musical and passionate.