- Messages
- 21,748
And here we (sadly) are. Continue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the problem is not only will their kids know. Their friends will too.My dad didn’t even write a book but I’ve heard all the details of everything. He always wanted to be an open book as his family was not, with mental health issues and suicide. All I can say is it is awkward to hear details of everything but there hasn’t been a suicide since my grandmother, his mom who he found.
I’m sure there’s a happy medium but whatever gets you through.
The thing is I disagree that being heir means more loved. Many say for example that King Charles was not at all the favorite of his parents.
The royal family didn’t pick William birth order did. And we can talk about it’s unfair but Harry is still immensely privileged over just about everyone else by the monarchy and that system. Including in his own family.
To be fair those pictures from Las Vegas are out there. I think his kids are more likely to see those than to ever read this book.I don't think Archie and Lili need to know that their dad's junk was frostbitten at their uncle's wedding.
Yes, but he wasn't asked for permission when those photos were posted. Whereas this information was told by him personally. He had a choice to tell or notTo be fair those pictures from Las Vegas are out there. I think his kids are more likely to see those than to ever read this book.
Yeah. It’s not good.The Netflix documentary IMO was very much Meghan. It seemed to be in her voice, have her POV, and her style. I also notice that the voice seems to be basically mentally sound. She might have been very depressed from the scrutiny and the paps, but you have a feeling she's not mentally wrecked. The doc reflects that.
Spare seems to be all Harry, for better or for worse. And I have a feeling that his headspace is
He was also lucky to meet her when they were both young. Meghan's mother seems like a lovely person, and I bet it would have been good for Harry to have someone like that in his life at a younger age.I do think William got lucky marrying Kate and having the Middletons as in laws.
Yeah. It’s not good.
Harry had a lot of privilege but he had really a troubled childhood. With two parents more interested in their love life’s than them. And yes I include Diana in that the boys went to boarding school very early on.
Add in his moms death and war…
I hope Archie and Lilys childhood is better.
I do think William got lucky marrying Kate and having the Middletons as in laws.
I remember reading YEARS ago (IIRC more than a decade) that it was William who had suggested Harry wear that uniform. This is not a new revelation.So now Harry is blaming William and Kate for his choice to wear a nazi uniform to a costume party?
Harry’s defined role has been to be a foil for William to keep him looking good and out of scandal, much like Andrew was for Charles and Margaret was for the Queen.He was also lucky to meet her when they were both young. Meghan's mother seems like a lovely person, and I bet it would have been good for Harry to have someone like that in his life at a younger age.
I feel bad for Harry. William always had a clear role, which is limiting but also gave him purpose from a young age. Harry hasn't had that, and while he has done well in various things (his military service, the Invictus Games) it does seem like he is still figuring out what he wants in life. And figuring that out in such a public way doesn't do anyone much good.
The problem I have with this is that Harry use to be the most favored member royal family member. He was the cheeky fun foil to his brother.Harry’s defined role has been to be a foil for William to keep him looking good and out of scandal, much like Andrew was for Charles and Margaret was for the Queen.
Harry is fighting back against this.
At this point he is like an animal backed into a corner fighting for his life.
He’s using anything he can to gain a life for himself but not always using the right strategies.
Because it was released "by mistake" in a shop in Spain so journalists got a copy of it before it was pulled off the shelvesIf the book has not been released, how do we know what is really in it? If the snippets noted above are true, I cannot imagine why anyone would want to voluntarily make that public??![]()
I took it at face value it was a mistake and then I heard someone opine today that it might have been intentional as now it's all anyone is talking which should help boost sales. In what was a short time ago considered an odd time to release a book (post Christmas sales) might turn out to be a geniu$ move for them.Apparently The Guardian has a copy as well.