I think that what 6.0 was good at was giving the judges the liberty of assigning the artistic mark in a more liberal manner, they could judge what was artistically superior without having to necessarily provide the "proof" as of why. If someone like Zagitova is providing the difficult transitions/choreography, and presensenting their program in a clear and effective manner, even if the program itself is crap, it's difficult to excuse not giviving her the components to go along with the stratospheric TES mark, plus it doesn't hurt that she comes from one of the powerhouses in the sport. It's like the U.S. gymnastics women were up to 2016. They ticked all the boxes, were consistent and came from a program that consistently delivered top level gymnasts. It's hard to break the system when the system itself doesn't give you enough of a back up to do so.