allezfred
Mean Spirited
- Messages
- 68,101
So any updates on the final. Am stuck in the middle of nowhere and Serena got penalises a game? 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So any updates on the final. Am stuck in the middle of nowhere and Serena got penalises a game?![]()
So, she got a coaching violation for a warning. Her coach was making motions with his hands telling her to go to net. Interviewed after the match he readily copped to it and said everyone does it.So any updates on the final. Am stuck in the middle of nowhere and Serena got penalises a game?![]()
for Naomi Osaka on winning Japan’s first Grand Slam title!
Why is it Serena always seems to lose her head at the US Open?![]()
Osaka deserved her win, but quite frankly the referee's calls were absolutely outrageous except for the second warning when Serena broke her racket.
The game penalty was utterly stupid. As she told the referees, male players redress the umpires far worse and far more often with no penalty at all. IMO Serena should have just quit at that time.
I agree with everything except for Serena quitting. Poor Naomi already looks despondent in what should be a joyous moment, and I think she would have felt even worse if Serena walked off the court. Both players were class in receiving their trophies; it's too bad the officials weren't up to the same level.
Reading reports that there was a lot of booing at the award ceremony? Osaka in tears and Serena having to tell the crowd to shut it.
https://twitter.com/amyohconnor/status/1038547585462673408?s=21
So basically all three calls were correct, but the first one is rarely to absolutely never called at all for anyone else. You have Serena’s coach even admitting that he did it but she says she didn’t see it and he says that he doesn’t even know if she saw it. I guess it’s similar to edge and underrotation calls in skating- skater A is never called for the blatant stuff and skater B is always losing 20 points of TES for the same thing. Serena could be made the example, but I don’t know that picking the biggest name in the sport at one of the marquee matches of the entire season was the place to start or try to explain your call if it was a non-issue before.
There was booing - husband and I both heard it - it was really unfortunate.
Booing during an award ceremony is just low class and takes away from what should a moment for the athletes.
It was absolutely unfortunate, but it was not directed at Osaka.
Be that as it may, it took away from her moment as if she was only victorious due to poor umpiring. It is low class behaviour.
It’s so bad, it might as well not be a rule. The problem wasn’t that Patrick was “coaching,” but that the rule is rarely enforced, and therefore just selectively enforced. I’m sure Ramos has umpired many Henin matches, and never called her out for being blatantly coached. It was a complete joke.I have not been following tennis so I have no idea how widespread the "illegal" coaching is.
I respectfully disagree. I think it’s unfair to compare Sloane’s match to this match; too many different variables. Plus, umpires judge what’s in front of them, not what happened in previous matches. It’s lame when players justify their actions based on others.It’s weird how the rules are always applied to Serena when other people get away with so much worst. I was at the Sloane match, and her coach was literally telling her where to hit her serves and returns, and no violations. It happened during the entire match.
It was the right call. Serena is innocent in this one, it’s her coach’s fault for the hand signals. As a veteran coach, he should know better. Serena does not need to acknowledge the hand signals. I suspect there will be drama when both meet up.The first code violation should have never happened. Ramos inserted himself into the match.
Serena should have let things go; did she not learn anything from the “I’ll shove it down your throat!” match? Her emotions got the best of her again. Calling the umpire a thief is accusatory, and the tone was over the top…the constant outburst at the chair was unnecessary. Big sister Venus is never like that. Ramos has an outstanding record.Then the third violation was an absolute a travesty. She didn’t curse, she didn’t smash anything else, she called him out on what she perceived as an injustice only to be given one of the worst calls in tennis history. I’ll be shocked if Ramos umpires again, that was a gross injustice of his authority.
I think it's unfair to look at what happened in isolation. This has been a rampant issue for over a decade. What happened today was a symptom of a greater disease when it comes to tennis officiating. The rules are continuously inconsistently and selectively enforced. It's not just bad officiating, but a bad standard of officiating that players and fans shouldn't stand for.I respectfully disagree. I think it’s unfair to compare Sloane’s match to this match; too many different variables. Plus, umpires judge what’s in front of them, not what happened in previous matches. It’s lame when players justify their actions based on others.
It was funny when Pam Shriver interviewed Serena's coach, he said he coaches all the time and never gets violations. He even admitted doing so during this event. Serena says in her press conference that she never gets any coaching and she will have to clarify what he's talking about.I foresee an end to that contract coming soon.
![]()
There will also be perceived inconsistencies in any sport that is judged by humans. I don't think Ramos was being biased or had any ill will toward Serena. He was reacting to what was in front of him; he can't account for what other umpires did or didn't do in other matches. If we don't want the 1st code violation at all, then simply don't do any hand signals, period. Serena's coach took the gamble, and got caught. If Ramos made a bad call, the 2 tournament officials above him would have reversed his decision.I think it's unfair to look at what happened in isolation. This has been a rampant issue for over a decade. What happened today was a symptom of a greater disease when it comes to tennis officiating. The rules are continuously inconsistently and selectively enforced. It's not just bad officiating, but a bad standard of officiating that players and fans shouldn't stand for.
Ramos had an outstanding record, but now it's one that shows clear inconsistencies.
I respectfully disagree. I think it’s unfair to compare Sloane’s match to this match; too many different variables. Plus, umpires judge what’s in front of them, not what happened in previous matches. It’s lame when players justify their actions based on others.
It was the right call. Serena is innocent in this one, it’s her coach’s fault for the hand signals. As a veteran coach, he should know better. Serena does not need to acknowledge the hand signals. I suspect there will be drama when both meet up.
Serena should have let things go; did she not learn anything from the “I’ll shove it down your throat!” match? Her emotions got the best of her again. Calling the umpire a thief is accusatory, and the tone was over the top…the constant outburst at the chair was unnecessary. Big sister Venus is never like that. Ramos has an outstanding record.
Anyway, Osaka deserves the win; she was the better player at this tournament anyway. Serena’s serve let her down today. Her head to head vs Serena is 2-0 now, so this is really not a surprise.
Again, you're looking at something in isolation. Ramos himself selectively enforces rules. That you fail to see the inconsistencies of not just him, but of officiating in tennis in general shows to me that you're starting with your conclusion first, and filling in the details later. Coaches have been doing this for decades. Ramos has umpired matches where coaches were blatantly telling players what to do and he did not call violations. To claim otherwise, or that Ramos was ignorant in these matches would itself be a willingly ignorant assertion.There will also be perceived inconsistencies in any sport that is judged by humans. I don't think Ramos was being biased or had any ill will toward Serena. He was reacting to what was in front of him; he can't account for what other umpires did or didn't do in other matches. If we don't want the 1st code violation at all, then simply don't do any hand signals, period. Serena's coach took the gamble, and got caught. If Ramos made a bad call, the 2 tournament officials above him would have reversed his decision.