This is something I think some aren't getting. USFS seems to plan for the short term. We need 3 spots for next year! So they bribe a certain someone to stay in. They mark another one overly generously at Nationals or are harsher on another. Etc. That has to impact the rest of the field. It trickles down with less money available, fewer slots at comps, knowing that there are fewer slots open at Nationals than on paper, because you know two people will be on the team no matter what.
So when people say, "Well, who would you send instead? We have no one better," that is it exactly. We don't know what would have happened if USFS had focused more on future skaters, even if we lost a slot at Worlds for the first season after the Olympics with 3 years to get it back.
Anyway, this is probably a discussion for another thread. Maybe we should find it (or create it) and move the discussion over there.