The Dance Hall 10: The Saitama Samba 2022-2023

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lilah has limitations, but there’s a long and inglorious history of people zeroing in on the female partner as an exaggeratedly weak link — even looking at this weekend’s senior podium, both Piper and Madison have been the subject of that through the years (which also, incidentally, downplays that they have both carried their partnerships on the presentation side).
Well, but Nik S and Zac L are taking lots of flak these days, for mistakes and affect. Morozov’s ex-partner got bad reviews. So it can go the other way, but thinking of the “weaker link” accusations on Kaitlin and Lilah and Somerville’s current partner, ?‍♀️
 
TBH I think a more egregious example of this is people calling Gabby Papadakis the weak link.

Definitely egregious, as she's not a weak link whatsoever. She did have the benefit/detriment of skating with Guillaume, who was monumentally talented, so I guess she was a weak link comparative to him. But who wouldn't have been? I doubt any female dancer short of Oksana Grischuk would have been at his level.

I'm trying to remember the last time there was a truly even TOP dance team since Grischuk & Platov, really. With Virtue & Moir, Tessa was the lesser skater of the two through their career, rightfully so, though she certainly improved and narrowed that gap. Unfortunate we always zero in on the female half of a team, considering the jokes about Roman were pretty bang on when it came to N&K.

My favourite is when someone tries saying "but she improved so much that she's now better than her partner." Sure, that's feasible with some skaters, like H&B, but while Piper will forever be better with presentation/acting, I can't see how she's ever going to be better than Paul in this lifetime. (Ditto Lilah)
 
Guillaume was one of the strongest ice dancers ever, but it was always Gabriella who drew me into her performances. That being said, in a way, both were criticized for things that I think they deserve more credit for. For Guillaume, it was his facial expressions and presentation at times (especially for programs like the 2016-17 SD) and for Gabriella, it was her skating skills.

IMO, the way Guillaume skated and moved was a HUGE reason why their performances almost always clicked for the audience and why it was able to get those up in the high seats and those watching on tv. He had that command that only dominant skating skills can provide. However, she was the soul and once Guillaume captured your attention, Gabby brought you in and made you feel part of their skating.

As for Gabriella, EVERYONE's skating skills (except for the top top top tier of all time) would lag behind Guillaume's, but she always was able to hold her own and, really, how many other female ice dancers were stronger than her, and if there were, were they that much stronger? No.

That all being said, I do think not many posters said the above or were that critical.



Regarding whether there's a gender disparity regarding scrutiny on female ice dancers' skating skills or male ice dancer's....I will say, I remember a period when the top teams had very strong female ice dancers and the men fell behind and it was commented on often. Think Fusar-Poli/Margaglio; Navka/Kostomorov; Grushina/Goncharov.

I do think teams with stronger females and less strong males have succeeded more or been more accepted, traditionally, just because of the way ice dance used to be structured historically. For example, with the Ravensburger Waltz, Renee Roca joked that the woman is twizzling and turning all over the place while the guy gets to relax.

This makes me think of the way Bestemianova/Bukin dominated over the much more equally-skilled (and amazingly skilled) Klimova/Ponomarenko. Bestemianova/Bukin were a team where the woman did almost all of the difficult work...where she was moving, turning, twisting, contorting, and doing all kinds of impressive stuff while he was kind of just there making sure she didn't fall and to lift her up in then-cool poses. He was also tall so he had a lot of speed and power to make their skating big. That team was very much like Roxie Hart's lyric:

"Yeah, I'll get a boy to work with - someone who can lift me up, show me off."

That being said, I do think critiques of female ice dancers being weaker can be fair, but it is starting to make one wonder why so many of them are perceived to be weaker than their male counterparts. Is there a big bias? Are people mistaking the way programs are structured where the male is carrying the female partner and assisting them in jumps and leaps and such as the female partner being weaker? Are people perceiving this because certain male partners of this crop just that talented and the female partners aren't actually weak (in the case of Guillaume...most possibly)? Or was there some deficiency in training? I also wonder if the likes of Piper Gilles, Madison Chock, and Lilah Fear are simply just being compared to other strong female ice dancers like Tessa Virtue, Madison Hubbell, and even the likes of Maia Shibutani and Charlene Guignard and other noted strong female ice dancers they're competing with.
 
Is Carreira now better than her partner?
I think for now, yes. She's tended to be the more reliable one in recent seasons. I think they will equal out over the next year or so though. I also think her performance ability has come a long way - in saying that though, personally, I found them to be pretty great junior perfomers. His performance ability at like 15 was one of the reasons why I liked them as juniors. That is one of his biggest areas to work on now, imo.

I'm very much missing Madi Hubbell this season - I think her and Zach were/are incredibly well matched.
 
Is Carreira now better than her partner?
She was the first person I thought of when @Andora said that. I keep hearing this ever since she improved so much over the summer while Anthony had to be off-ice recovering. (I'm in no teknik myself, so I can't really judge!)
 


Regarding whether there's a gender disparity regarding scrutiny on female ice dancers' skating skills or male ice dancer's....I will say, I remember a period when the top teams had very strong female ice dancers and the men fell behind and it was commented on often. Think Fusar-Poli/Margaglio; Navka/Kostomorov; Grushina/Goncharov.

I do think teams with stronger females and less strong males have succeeded more or been more accepted, traditionally, just because of the way ice dance used to be structured historically. For example, with the Ravensburger Waltz, Renee Roca joked that the woman is twizzling and turning all over the place while the guy gets to relax.
That made me think back to Lombardia Trophy's live-streaming when they were commenting on Fusar Poli being technically stronger than Maraglia, Valter Rizzo came up with "but Maurizio was a great porteur!"
 
That made me think back to Lombardia Trophy's live-streaming when they were commenting on Fusar Poli being technically stronger than Maraglia, Valter Rizzo came up with "but Maurizio was a great porteur!"
He also brought the porny/sexy to that team, and you can never underestimate how far sex can take you on the road to success.
 
This makes me think of the way Bestemianova/Bukin dominated over the much more equally-skilled (and amazingly skilled) Klimova/Ponomarenko. Bestemianova/Bukin were a team where the woman did almost all of the difficult work...where she was moving, turning, twisting, contorting, and doing all kinds of impressive stuff while he was kind of just there making sure she didn't fall and to lift her up in then-cool poses. He was also tall so he had a lot of speed and power to make their skating big. That team was very much like Roxie Hart's lyric:

"Yeah, I'll get a boy to work with - someone who can lift me up, show me off."

That being said, I do think critiques of female ice dancers being weaker can be fair, but it is starting to make one wonder why so many of them are perceived to be weaker than their male counterparts. Is there a big bias? Are people mistaking the way programs are structured where the male is carrying the female partner and assisting them in jumps and leaps and such as the female partner being weaker? Are people perceiving this because certain male partners of this crop just that talented and the female partners aren't actually weak (in the case of Guillaume...most possibly)? Or was there some deficiency in training? I also wonder if the likes of Piper Gilles, Madison Chock, and Lilah Fear are simply just being compared to other strong female ice dancers like Tessa Virtue, Madison Hubbell, and even the likes of Maia Shibutani and Charlene Guignard and other noted strong female ice dancers they're competing with.

(Snip & bold mine) Agreed - not to mention how many of us older than 35 who have strong female dancers more in mind than those newer to the sport. Everyone is compared to the 1994 Olympic podium for me. :P

Another reason for the current disparity we see currently could be due to lifts becoming such integral elements compared to 2002 or even 2006. If you're Lewis Gibson and the judging system is similar to 2002, depending on your options, you possibly choose a different partner.

Luckily things have played out differently. While I can recognize Ms. Fear's skating issues, I'd rather ice dance WITH Fear & Gibson than without.

She was the first person I thought of when @Andora said that. I keep hearing this ever since she improved so much over the summer while Anthony had to be off-ice recovering. (I'm in no teknik myself, so I can't really judge!)

She's certainly highlighted better this year. I have no idea if Christina was truly that far behind Anthony in the first place. They strike me as a team (like many) with different strengths who will even out together.

Controversially (?) I think Gabi was better than Gui in the last quad :censored:

Hard to say for me being in no-teknik (thank you @Wyliefan for reminding me of the term), but I found Gabi's biggest improvement last quad was in how she commanded the ice WITH Guillaume. Their Wacking RD wouldn't have been as intense/impressive if she was the same skater as she was in 2018-- and she was obviously quite exceptional then. Big reason I think P&C were sooooo amazing: they didn't create programs that hid their deficiencies, I feel like they leaned into them instead. (I'm not explaining that very well...)
 
Big reason I think P&C were sooooo amazing: they didn't create programs that hid their deficiencies, I feel like they leaned into them instead. (I'm not explaining that very well...)
It sounds interesting but I am not sure I get what you are saying. Could you elaborate with an example maybe ?
 
I think another reason for Bestiamanova & Bukin staying on top is their compulsories were excellent and compulsories set the tone for the overall event back then. Not saying Klimova & Ponomareko's weren't also great but B&B often legitimately won the compulsories. Which set the tone of scoring back then. We will never know but I suspect if it was just an original and free dance like today, K&P would have overtaken B&B by 86 at the latest, possibly even sooner, and never ceded control again, particularly as K&P did beat or come close to beating B&B in either the OD or FD phase often.
 
(Snip & bold mine) Agreed - not to mention how many of us older than 35 who have strong female dancers more in mind than those newer to the sport. Everyone is compared to the 1994 Olympic podium for me. :p

Another reason for the current disparity we see currently could be due to lifts becoming such integral elements compared to 2002 or even 2006. If you're Lewis Gibson and the judging system is similar to 2002, depending on your options, you possibly choose a different partner.

Luckily things have played out differently. While I can recognize Ms. Fear's skating issues, I'd rather ice dance WITH Fear & Gibson than without.



She's certainly highlighted better this year. I have no idea if Christina was truly that far behind Anthony in the first place. They strike me as a team (like many) with different strengths who will even out together.



Hard to say for me being in no-teknik (thank you @Wyliefan for reminding me of the term), but I found Gabi's biggest improvement last quad was in how she commanded the ice WITH Guillaume. Their Wacking RD wouldn't have been as intense/impressive if she was the same skater as she was in 2018-- and she was obviously quite exceptional then. Big reason I think P&C were sooooo amazing: they didn't create programs that hid their deficiencies, I feel like they leaned into them instead. (I'm not explaining that very well...)
yes absolutely. i enjoy the variety of performances we get from the various teams

BUT while i can appreciate the fun& upbeat programs of f/g and the use of strong lift positions/out-of-box programs of c/b or g/p, i can ALSO use my still-devoloping understanding of superb skating skills to question competition results when they are off.
 
I think another reason for Bestiamanova & Bukin staying on top is their compulsories were excellent and compulsories set the tone for the overall event back then. Not saying Klimova & Ponomareko's weren't also great but B&B often legitimately won the compulsories. Which set the tone of scoring back then. We will never know but I suspect if it was just an original and free dance like today, K&P would have overtaken B&B by 86 at the latest, possibly even sooner, and never ceded control again, particularly as K&P did beat or come close to beating B&B in either the OD or FD phase often.
Oh yeah, Bestemianova/Bukin had great compulsories that were more about sustaining fast and deep run-of-edges. However, who would have won the yet-to-be adapted and then turned into a CD "Golden Waltz"? :shuffle:

I think you do have a point about whether Klimova/Ponomarenko could have overtaken B/B if it was just the OD/FD format of today since they did win the OSP over B/B at both 1986 and 1987 Worlds and they lost 1986 Worlds FD in a 5/4 split.
 
It sounds interesting but I am not sure I get what you are saying. Could you elaborate with an example maybe ?

I'll try! :lol: I loved their 2016 FD, but I also thought it was too close to their previous Mozart program the year before in tone. This overly romanticized sense of "Gabi is a haunted but graceful gamine that needs protection". Considering how good the IAM team is at playing to their teams strengths, they could have stayed on that spectrum and Guillaume could carry Gabi to every win. But that's not what they did. It started with their less-popular 2017 "Stillness" FD that had a bit more mirrored movement, less hiding one partner behind the other. When they were criticized for lack of "traditional male/female romance," they came back with a supremely passionate Tango and almost saccharine romance with Ms. Yamagata. They addressed it head on, imho.

My biggest criticism was I thought they needed to be more athletic, or recognize the importance of that as equal to artistry in a competitive sport. Some said they were too serious/stuffy with their "we're arteests" approach. Oh yeah? How does a quirky and awesome RD to Fame suit you? For me, their 2022 programs both knocked those critiques out.

I just feel they didn't shy away from criticism, or let politics take care of it like teams of the past. But that's just my very weird take.
 
I think for now, yes. She's tended to be the more reliable one in recent seasons. I think they will equal out over the next year or so though. I also think her performance ability has come a long way - in saying that though, personally, I found them to be pretty great junior perfomers. His performance ability at like 15 was one of the reasons why I liked them as juniors. That is one of his biggest areas to work on now, imo.

I'm very much missing Madi Hubbell this season - I think her and Zach were/are incredibly well matched.
I always thought the criticisms of Christina were overblown. Yes she wasn't as advanced as he was when they were in juniors, but Anthony is one of those exceptional prodigies, just about anyone would look inferior. She's always been solid and steady, but the way people talked about them sometimes you'd think Christina could barely do a three turn without his help. And their performance quality was very good and well matched in juniors. The increasing struggles with his injury and less than stellar packaging and inconsistency weakened his skating and performance quality, but given the progress they've already made I expect them to get all of that back and more.
 
I always thought the criticisms of Christina were overblown. Yes she wasn't as advanced as he was when they were in juniors, but Anthony is one of those exceptional prodigies, just about anyone would look inferior. She's always been solid and steady, but the way people talked about them sometimes you'd think Christina could barely do a three turn without his help. And their performance quality was very good and well matched in juniors. The increasing struggles with his injury and less than stellar packaging and inconsistency weakened his skating and performance quality, but given the progress they've already made I expect them to get all of that back and more.
purely me speculating but I feel like Christina herself thinks she's improved, or at least has people around her now reminding her of how good she actually is. I'll never forget that interview after Skate America 2020 when she said that she knew Anthony was so much better than her and she might never match him. I get the impression that their new coaches would absolutely discourage that kind of comparison.
 
Maybe in the future, instead of making blanket statements that so and so has “bad skating skills”, we should be a little more specific about what we mean.

Like, “Outside of the required elements, skater X skates mostly on flats and relies on Skater Y to assist her while doing crossovers just so she can keep up with him.”

Or, “Notice how messy Skater Y’s exits are are every time he has to do a turn during their diagonal step and during their one foot, his edges are clearly aren’t as deep as hers and every time he tries to go deeper, he loses control going into the next turn.”

Or, “Sure they both skate fast, but they rely more on big, open holds, two-footed skated and less-than-ideal posture when they power through their crossovers as opposed to moving across the rink with clean lines and carriage.”

I think in the past when there were a lot less required elements put on skaters to show off individual skating skills, it was much easier to see a Margaglio almost never doing any difficult turns or steps while Fusar-Poli was doing all the work around him and then when he did move across the ice it was clearly not of the same caliber or quality, so more blanket statements were much more obvious.
 
purely me speculating but I feel like Christina herself thinks she's improved, or at least has people around her now reminding her of how good she actually is. I'll never forget that interview after Skate America 2020 when she said that she knew Anthony was so much better than her and she might never match him. I get the impression that their new coaches would absolutely discourage that kind of comparison.
She's also mentioned how much having Madison Hubbell as a coach has helped. She also thanked Madison for being her glam squad all week at Espoo, so I feel like you're right. Christina is building confidence by getting it from her coaches, both on and off the ice. And I'll be honest, having Scott Moir to partner you can be kind of huge. I had an amazing dance coach, and skating with him made me worlds better individually. I trusted him implicitly and then learned I could do so much more than I thought. I think it's just a perfect set of conditions for Christina in particular to excel.
 
Maybe in the future, instead of making blanket statements that so and so has “bad skating skills”, we should be a little more specific about what we mean.

That would be ideal - but not everyone is capable of that specificity. Ideally that would mean people would just not comment instead of leaning on blanket statements, but then this is FSU. (And this thread would be really quiet :lol: )
 
Maybe in the future, instead of making blanket statements that so and so has “bad skating skills”, we should be a little more specific about what we mean.

Like, “Outside of the required elements, skater X skates mostly on flats and relies on Skater Y to assist her while doing crossovers just so she can keep up with him.”

Or, “Notice how messy Skater Y’s exits are are every time he has to do a turn during their diagonal step and during their one foot, his edges are clearly aren’t as deep as hers and every time he tries to go deeper, he loses control going into the next turn.”

Or, “Sure they both skate fast, but they rely more on big, open holds, two-footed skated and less-than-ideal posture when they power through their crossovers as opposed to moving across the rink with clean lines and carriage.”

I think in the past when there were a lot less required elements put on skaters to show off individual skating skills, it was much easier to see a Margaglio almost never doing any difficult turns or steps while Fusar-Poli was doing all the work around him and then when he did move across the ice it was clearly not of the same caliber or quality, so more blanket statements were much more obvious.
I couldn't love this post more.
 
That would be ideal - but not everyone is capable of that specificity. Ideally that would mean people would just not comment instead of leaning on blanket statements, but then this is FSU. (And this thread would be really quiet :lol: )
True.:lol:
But then people shouldn't be commenting on a skater's skating skills.

Having said that, I don't think VGThuy's examples were that difficult for long time fans to notice and point out. Except for maybe skating on flats. That's a pretty tough one for even expert fans to see accurately in real time. Slow-Mo helps of course.

Especially with some of the slow mo camera work while waiting for marks in the kiss and cry.
 
True.:lol:
But then people shouldn't be commenting on a skater's skating skills.

Having said that, I don't think VGThuy's examples were that difficult for long time fans to notice and point out. Except for maybe skating on flats. That's a pretty tough one for even expert fans to see accurately in real time. Slow-Mo helps of course.

Especially with some of the slow mo camera work while waiting for marks in the kiss and cry.
I do agree and also think it’s difficult during the required elements, especially in the old pattern dances where skaters would get a level 2 and you weren’t sure why when the edge looked deep enough and clean enough to non-expert eyes. But I do think if you look “outside” of the elements and just watch how the skaters are getting across the rink and if one partner is constantly being pulled or “handled”, then it’s easier to see.

I will say this, as much as we may complain about today’s ice dancers not paying as much attention to things like closed holds or some of the more fundamentals of “classic” ice dance, any ice dancer who is competing now has had to learn to master or get to an enough of high level in “skating skills” than what generations prior to IJS asked. An example would be Lilah Fear and Madison Chock who are often used as examples as skaters that need to rely on their partners to get them across the ice and whose edges have been questioned. I think those criticisms are more than fair. But then during required elements where they have to do the same or comparable difficult steps as their partner, they do it and sometimes can achieve level 3s and 4s.

Now, whether achieving high levels on required elements is really a true barometer of “skating skills” has been a question since Belbin/Agosto and Grushina/Goncharov used to achieve higher levels than the likes of Denkova/Stavisky and Delobel/Schoenfelder when prior to IJS, and under 6.0, most people would have considered both D/S’s to have had superior difficulty and skating skills to that of B/A and G/G.

Then there’s the flip side where the older codes that put had much higher point differentials between levels than exists now were the only reasons great and technically-sound teams were able to beat teams the judges’ may have preferred and thus upset the apple cart and made competitions more about field-of-play on that day because the system did reward skating skills much more properly than the 6.0 system.

Long post short…it’s all nuanced, complicated, and contradictory haha.
 
I also think that there's an aspect where there are simply just a lot more female skaters than male, and so the women almost get viewed as interchangeable. If she's not incredible, she's not indespensable, and he'd be good with any partner so if any difficulties arise he might as well drop her and move on. I have in fact seen people say almost exactly that, and it's honestly kind of disgusting. It's a team, they have different strengths and work together to make a whole. They're not spare parts that can just be swapped out whenever there's difficulty.

I've also heard numerous female ice dancers talk about being constantly compared to each other and disparaged as not being good enough, while the men barely got any of that at all and got more time to just enjoy skating without the constant comparisons. Tessa's brought it up, I remember Tanith gave an interview along those lines, Christina's interview as mentioned above(and I imagine that having your partner not only being a prodigy but also having Olympic champion parents makes it even worse).
 
The past several pages of this thread have been a pleasure to read. Yes, there’s a push and pull in ideas and people still have strong preferences, but it feels like there’s this overall movement toward examining how we talk about individual skaters….a desire for perhaps being more instead of less gracious?
 
I've also heard numerous female ice dancers talk about being constantly compared to each other and disparaged as not being good enough, while the men barely got any of that at all and got more time to just enjoy skating without the constant comparisons. Tessa's brought it up, I remember Tanith gave an interview along those lines, Christina's interview as mentioned above(and I imagine that having your partner not only being a prodigy but also having Olympic champion parents makes it even worse).

Yes - and you hit on something that bothers me about the way women in ice dance are often treated. Those three (fantastic) skaters are taller/have larger frames than the more diminutive, "easy to toss around" skaters like Madison Chock & Lilah Fear. Tessa left her waif days behind not long after her Vancouver OGM, and various skating fans never let her forget it. At the time, it was easy to brush off as bad luck to be competing against someone so naturally small, like Meryl Davis.

But then look at what's said about skaters like Davis, Chock, Fear, etc. They're never considered very good in terms of skating skills comparatively. Women in ice dance can never win with this sexism. If you've got great skating skills, you're probably going to be denigrated for your size (Madison Hubbel, Kaitlyn Hawayek, etc), and if you're small, you're not considered great with the blade.

I never hear anything like this about male ice dancers. :( It's so drastically unfair. The worst they get is they're considered too short-- and even then, it's relative to their partner, and often enough someone suggests they should find someone smaller.

What a messy and mean sport we love.
 
This discussion reminded me of IAM's warmup thing where they have the skaters swap partners for stroking exercises, and I remember Madison Hubbell saying that she and Guillaume didn't really skate well together. If all it took to make a good team was skating skills, you'd imagine they'd make for great partners, but it's not the case. I don't know what goes into this and what makes a team a good match, but presumably there's a reason these people have chosen to continue to skate with their partners against the advice of posters ?
 
Oh yeah, Bestemianova/Bukin had great compulsories that were more about sustaining fast and deep run-of-edges. However, who would have won the yet-to-be adapted and then turned into a CD "Golden Waltz"? :shuffle:

I think you do have a point about whether Klimova/Ponomarenko could have overtaken B/B if it was just the OD/FD format of today since they did win the OSP over B/B at both 1986 and 1987 Worlds and they lost 1986 Worlds FD in a 5/4 split.
How different the entire rest of the quad probably would have been if K&D won 1 more judge and won the 86 worlds. Given the way ice dance worked back then, I honestly can't imagine them losing to B&B even a single time ever again. Instead they would never beat them a single time as amateurs again, and never even came that close ever again.

Klimova & Ponomarenko would have won the Golden Waltz against any team in history I think (hope). Whether that be Torvill & Dean, Virtue & Moir, Papdadakis & Cizeron, whoever. It is their dance, they owned it. It is amazing to think they would turn probably the hardest and most challenging original dance in the world, by one of the best technical teams of all time, in only 87 to a compulsory dance just 10 years later. No wonder so many teams had trouble with it, for lower ranked teams with limited skills or skating skills, it must have really been a nightmare.
 
This discussion reminded me of IAM's warmup thing where they have the skaters swap partners for stroking exercises, and I remember Madison Hubbell saying that she and Guillaume didn't really skate well together. If all it took to make a good team was skating skills, you'd imagine they'd make for great partners, but it's not the case. I don't know what goes into this and what makes a team a good match, but presumably there's a reason these people have chosen to continue to skate with their partners against the advice of posters ?
during the last olys, someone on tiktok posted some footage from evan bates' ig live where the i.am teams were practicing a rumba pattern with mixed partners (diaz & hubbell & papadakis together, chock with either cizeron or donahue i think, etc.). they're all goofing around with each other during the gala practice.

then they show olivia partnered with papadakis with olivia in what would conventionally be the women's position and papadakis in the men's in a crossed killian hold. i think they're also doing the same rumba pattern.

at one point, as they're moving in a deep lobe on a right forward inside edge, olivia starts screaming to gabby, "oh my god your edges are so deep!!" and gabby's just giggling and holding tight to keep olivia from falling ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information