I also keep in mind their decent showing on the GP considering he was then injured. I don't think they or SC are expecting 100%, to your point.
Yes, probably the hope is to be at least as strong as they were before the surgery.
I also keep in mind their decent showing on the GP considering he was then injured. I don't think they or SC are expecting 100%, to your point.
Unfortunately, I don't think this result is going to be that big a help, when you consider M/G skated error-free and ended up only fractionally ahead of the other two teams, both of whom had deductions and level problems.Interesting results among the Canadian teams today at JW. I wonder if this result will help Makita/Gunara get a little more respect among Canadian dance judges. Canadian dance judges seem to have favoured D’A/W and B/B up to this point even though I think M/G are the stronger skaters and have more difficult programs.
Unfortunately, I don't think this result is going to be that big a help, when you consider M/G skated error-free and ended up only fractionally ahead of the other two teams, both of whom had deductions and level problems.
Speaking of the latter: TCC, why have you not fixed Natalie & Bruce's combination spin? That thing has been called a level 2 so many times, clearly there's something about its construction that is vulnerable to execution problems, that should have been significantly revised some time ago. They would have been eighth rather than eleventh if they had gotten a level 4.
No, but the things they got lower levels on -- the RD pattern, step sequences, the one-foot -- are things that basically nobody gets perfect 4s on. The other two teams lost twizzle and/or spin levels, which are supposed to be your base of points.Well it’s not like M/G were getting all level 4s in the RD and FD.
No, but the things they got lower levels on -- the RD pattern, step sequences, the one-foot -- are things that basically nobody gets perfect 4s on. The other two teams lost twizzle and/or spin levels, which are supposed to be your base of points.
M/G beat the other two on RD pattern levels, for instance, and their free dance BV was similarly 1-2 points higher than their rivals.
Does anyone know where the fall deduction occurred on Nat and Bruce's program?Unfortunately, I don't think this result is going to be that big a help, when you consider M/G skated error-free and ended up only fractionally ahead of the other two teams, both of whom had deductions and level problems.
Speaking of the latter: TCC, why have you not fixed Natalie & Bruce's combination spin? That thing has been called a level 2 so many times, clearly there's something about its construction that is vulnerable to execution problems, that should have been significantly revised some time ago. They would have been eighth rather than eleventh if they had gotten a level 4.
I believe the fall deduction came from the last moment in the program when Bruce lost his balance and moved onto both knees rather than staying on one (like Natalie). There was even a brief moment when all of his weight was on his knees, as his upper body fell forward and the rest of his legs lifted off the ice. There have been some fairly harsh fall deductions over this season, but I'll be honest in saying I didn't think this was one of the harshest.Does anyone know where the fall deduction occurred on Nat and Bruce's program?
Thanks....I was watching on replay and eyes were on her. Then when Ted was doing his review he said there was a point deduction but he didn't know why...After on the protocols it showed a fall.I believe the fall deduction came from the last moment in the program when Bruce lost his balance and moved onto both knees rather than staying on one (like Natalie). There was even a brief moment when all of his weight was on his knees, as his upper body fell forward and the rest of his legs lifted off the ice. There have been some fairly harsh fall deductions over this season, but I'll be honest in saying I didn't think this was one of the harshest.