hanca
Values her privacy
- Messages
- 12,547
Common sense would say that No 2 is correct, but from some reason I love option 3.These two paragraphs are contradictory to me (and I agree with the second one).
For me, they are indeed many reasons why people do not exactly "choose" their food :
- economic constraints
- other practical constraints (are they good healthy shops nearby ?)
- habits, especially developed during childhood where when are very sensitive to sugar
- and worst than habits, addictions to sugar (https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2017/08/23/bjsports-2017-097971)
It would not surprise me that people can be as hooked to bad food (that is more artificially sugared) as other people can be addicted to coffee and cigarettes. The way to counter that addiction is not by giving people choices, because we are free adults and stuff, but by regulation. That's what working for the cigarettes in the US right now.
This not a US problem btw, this is a industrial world problem.
If you look at this map however, you find that the obesity situation is worse in the US than in other Western countries: https://www.worldobesity.org/data/map/overview-adults). The worst EU country (obesity wise) for example, Romania, has a 29/34 F/M obesity percentage, and that's significantly less than the US 37/41 score. Sweden's score, one of the EU winners in the 2010s, is at 16/17 percent. Less than half the US score.
They are only a handful explanations for this :
- 1) Americans do not exercise enough
- 2) Social or economic constraints make it harder for Americans to eat healthy (that's the explanation you seem to reject ?)
- 3) Americans want to be obese because they find it bootylicious
- 4) Americans are freely making stupid decisions about their health
- 5) The map is wrong : it was funded by the EU and as always Europeans want to make Americans look bad.
- 6) Vikings raids keep the Swedes very active and healthy and annoyingly always first at everything.
I go with 2) btw.