savchenkoboss
Banned Member
- Messages
- 471
At the time of his career the North American hype was that Stojko was underscored and the judges just didnt "get his style". In hindsight though was he in fact overscored with a false perception he was underscored due to his arguably being robbed of a higher placing at the 92 Olympics and probably of the gold at the 94 Olympics?
Lets look at some events in his career.
95 worlds- A battle between Eldredge and Stojko. Both had a fall, but Eldredge threw in the 2nd triple axel in the final seconds he fell on earlier, while Stojko threw in a triple lutz-triple toe. I would argue a late triple axel beautifully done is still more impressive than a late triple-triple, even if both are very impressive. Eldredge had better spins and better artistry too. Stojko even won 3 of his 6 judges on artistic marks, 3 judges who tied them technically and gave Stojko a higher artistic mark. Eldredge probably should have won worlds this year, and not Stojko.
96-97 Grand Prix final- This particular win by Stojko was ridiculous IMO. He did the quad-triple but fell on a triple axel, missed a triple loop, and had his worst choreographed program ever. Eldredge was perfect even though he didnt try the quad, and his program in every other way- jumps, spins, choroegraphy, speed, was far superior to Stojko's, minus the quad, and Stojko's mistakes more than negated the quad combo IMO. Urmanov did a clean quad and doubled a couple jumps, but overall had a cleaner and better presented program than Stojko. IMO this was strictly a home court result (GPF was in Canada, Bourne & Kraatz also had a controversial win to some over Krylova & Ovsiannikov in the dance event).
97 worlds- Stojko fully deserved to win the long program but since he was 4th in the short and Eldredge definitely deserved to win the short over Urmanov, Eldredge should have defended his title due to being robbed of winning the short program.
97-98 Grand Prix final- Stojko fell on his quad and had many other shaky landings and still took 2nd over Eldredge who skated cleanly which he did not deserve. Should have been 3rd or lower.
98 Olympics- Stojko should have been 4th in the short behind Eldredge who had better spins and Yagudin who had higher jumps and superior presentation, which due to his 3rd place in the long program would have dropped him to the bronze behind Candelero overall.
99 Skate Canada- He landed only 4 triples here and took 2nd to Yagudin which was crazy when many other guys landed 6 or 7.
99-2000 Grand Prix final- Goebel and Abt landed many more jumps than him and he still took 2nd to Plushenko, another gift.
2000 worlds- He fell on the quad in every program and was still given the silver to Yagudin. In the short he was put over many guys who skated cleanly even though he fell on his quad. Had he placed lower in the short he would have been off the podium. 2nd in the long was probably right given how everyone else skated.
So it seems he was regularly held up and overscored, with Eldredge usually the biggest victim of Stojko's overscoring, and it was part out of pity for being robbed at the 92 and 94 Olympics. And Stojko helped this myth by milking his supposed underscoring to the media, even though he knew perfectly well he was conning them to perpetuate the myth of his being underscored, in order to bully judges to continue overscoring and holding him up.
Lets look at some events in his career.
95 worlds- A battle between Eldredge and Stojko. Both had a fall, but Eldredge threw in the 2nd triple axel in the final seconds he fell on earlier, while Stojko threw in a triple lutz-triple toe. I would argue a late triple axel beautifully done is still more impressive than a late triple-triple, even if both are very impressive. Eldredge had better spins and better artistry too. Stojko even won 3 of his 6 judges on artistic marks, 3 judges who tied them technically and gave Stojko a higher artistic mark. Eldredge probably should have won worlds this year, and not Stojko.
96-97 Grand Prix final- This particular win by Stojko was ridiculous IMO. He did the quad-triple but fell on a triple axel, missed a triple loop, and had his worst choreographed program ever. Eldredge was perfect even though he didnt try the quad, and his program in every other way- jumps, spins, choroegraphy, speed, was far superior to Stojko's, minus the quad, and Stojko's mistakes more than negated the quad combo IMO. Urmanov did a clean quad and doubled a couple jumps, but overall had a cleaner and better presented program than Stojko. IMO this was strictly a home court result (GPF was in Canada, Bourne & Kraatz also had a controversial win to some over Krylova & Ovsiannikov in the dance event).
97 worlds- Stojko fully deserved to win the long program but since he was 4th in the short and Eldredge definitely deserved to win the short over Urmanov, Eldredge should have defended his title due to being robbed of winning the short program.
97-98 Grand Prix final- Stojko fell on his quad and had many other shaky landings and still took 2nd over Eldredge who skated cleanly which he did not deserve. Should have been 3rd or lower.
98 Olympics- Stojko should have been 4th in the short behind Eldredge who had better spins and Yagudin who had higher jumps and superior presentation, which due to his 3rd place in the long program would have dropped him to the bronze behind Candelero overall.
99 Skate Canada- He landed only 4 triples here and took 2nd to Yagudin which was crazy when many other guys landed 6 or 7.
99-2000 Grand Prix final- Goebel and Abt landed many more jumps than him and he still took 2nd to Plushenko, another gift.
2000 worlds- He fell on the quad in every program and was still given the silver to Yagudin. In the short he was put over many guys who skated cleanly even though he fell on his quad. Had he placed lower in the short he would have been off the podium. 2nd in the long was probably right given how everyone else skated.
So it seems he was regularly held up and overscored, with Eldredge usually the biggest victim of Stojko's overscoring, and it was part out of pity for being robbed at the 92 and 94 Olympics. And Stojko helped this myth by milking his supposed underscoring to the media, even though he knew perfectly well he was conning them to perpetuate the myth of his being underscored, in order to bully judges to continue overscoring and holding him up.