This is an interesting question, I must say. I didn't understand the Grishuk and Platov dominance during their career and nearly always enjoyed the skating of some of their competitors more whereas I really liked Oksana Baiul and was saddened by her push through pro events in spite of injury and subsequent loss of form. I think she would have given the world many outstanding programs if her body and mind had been healthier. What stands out for me now, as a more seasoned viewer, is Grishuk's speed and commitment to her programs. I appreciate her work more now, but she still doesn't figure among my favorite skaters... and her onscreen persona in interviews of that time ("A Tale of Two Oksanas") is not something I "like".
In spite of Oksana Baiul's personal troubles, I hold a lot of sympathy for her. I'm not sure she's ever escaped some past traumas, and it's hard to really break free from negative cycles of thought and behavior for anyone, especially someone without a family and her history. As for her skating, I don't think I can rate a single mover on the ice above her. As commentators and fans often say, she expresses the music with her entire body and she does it so well. She is dramatic and her actions look as though she has done all the choreography. Nothing seems taught, rehearsed, or foreign. I think she would be a great choreographer in terms of her ideas and her modeling the movements.
One last note: from 1991 to 2011, my only live skating event as an audience member was the 1993 Tom Collins tour. My dad told me either during or after Oksana's program, "Gosh, she's really something special." I don't think he even bothered to comment on any of the other skaters. That says something.