Vaytsekhovskaya's interview with Chebotareva

TAHbKA

Cats and garlic lover
Messages
22,038
Vaytsekhovskaya's interview with Chebotareva for ria.ru (please click the original link...)

EV: Your pupil Stanislava Kosntantinova became 4th at the nationals which were the Olympic team qualifier, and that after getting 0 points for one of her jumps in the LP. Did you imagine she could have made it to the top 3 and the team?

VC: Of course we dream of the highest results and work to make them come true. I’m the first one to have those dreams. But before the Nationals I knew how hard it would be and the goal I set to Konstantinova was to be top 6. She did even more, which is a great new years’ present for me.



EV: She was not upset realizing how close she got to going not only to the Europeans but perhaps the Olympics?

VC: I don’t think it could upset her at all - we both were thinking of top 6. Hence her 4th place is a great result. Being the first alternative in the Olympic season is great.



EV: The new fashion in the ladies skating is not the best for the senior skaters: when the bet is set on the little girls who can do the jumps in the 2nd part of the programme. Your athlete is 17y.o. Did you slow it down on purpose so Konstantinova would not switch to the seniors at the age of 15 or it just happened?

VC: I never rush things when it’s about my pupils. I don’t let them train too much. Hence at the age of 13-14 they simply can’t skate like, say, Eteri Tutberidze’s girls do. They need more time.



EV: Aren’t you afraid their time may never come?

VC: And yet that’s my point of view. I think the big sport should not begin when the athletes are too young. I want my skaters to be healthy when they get to that level and show their best results when they are adults. Figure skating is a huge stress on the spine and the legs. When the kid is too tired with too much skating and working off the ice the possibility of an injury increases.

If the injury happens it takes a long time to recover and all the work that was done is wasted – they have to re-learn everything. I put a lot of effort on preventing and avoiding the injuries, I love my skaters and cherish them. Am sometimes scorned for that. But I don’t have skaters to spare. Those who I do are precious. Hence I will never let them work more if I see the kid is tired.

I know that in Moscow a lot of parents are eager to see how their 15y.o becomes a world champion and would do anything to achieve it.



EV: Does it happen in St. Petersburg as well?

VC: Thank god, no.



EV: I think it’s hard setting the highest goals knowing the base conditions for the adults and the kids are not equal.

VC: I’m motivated by that. When Konstantinova was little she was much behind the other kids her age. But I saw the potential and knew I’d get it out of her. It’s a game. And, as far as I can tell, Stanislava believes the same.



EV: How did you get through the puberty with her? It’s a harsh thing both for the athlete and the coach.

VC: It was tough, just like for anyone else. We spoke a lot, including talking to the parents and there were things I made Stanislava do.



EV: Such as?

VC: Running, checking her weight, eating right, and talking talking, talking….



EV: The physical activity at the practices was not enough? She had to run?

VC: Except for the ice time there is gym two times a week and choreography 4 times a week. I.e. every weekday the athlete does something off the ice. But if I see Stanislava gained a bit of weight I add the running. 40 minutes running a day and problems solved.

The most important during puberty is keeping the weight stable. If you gain too much working on getting back to the right condition becomes harder. You can see now – being 166cm tall Konstantinova weights 51kg. She is not thin and she can take the stress perfectly – her muscles are in perfect conditions.



EV: Two years ago, when we spoke in Bratislava Europeans your pupil Kolyada became 5th and you said you don’t always have an opportunity working with the needed specialists. Have it changed?

VC: It did. Thank our St. Petersburg FS federation and the national one. We got a great specialist on the general strength Mikhail Semenenok, a gliding specialist Alexey Kozlov. Tatiana Kositsina helps me working with the kids and our choreographer Olga Klushnichenko is always here.

This summer she went with Mikhail to Switzerland for a couple of days to work with Lambiel and think they did a wonderful job on the steps. I.e. everything in our group is great and I can’t wish for better conditions.



EV: Mishin said he doesn’t believe the ladies skating will progress towards the quads, but more like the ladies will be landing a 3A. What do you think?

VC: I think the female skating should remain female. It’s hard enough as it is to try to make it even harder.



EV: Does Konstantinova say herself she’d like to attempt a new jump?

VC: We did try a 4S and we do it. Perhaps it’s not doomed, we’ll see. It’s not just about learning a jump. You have to land it in the competitions. It’s hard. Besides, the ladies are competitive without the quad.



EV: do you plan changing Kolyada’s programmes before the Europeans? The jumps, their order?

VC: We will discuss it. Right after the Nationals Mikhail went to Germany to consult the doctors about his back.



EV: What happened?

VC: Nothing major. His back hurts from time to time, like all the skaters’, hence we try not to let it become worse. We didn’t even have time to discuss the nationals. Before thinking of some changes we have to analyze what didn’t work and why. My athletes and I love discussing things.

For example, I see nothing wrong with him falling from the 4S. Yet him missing a 3A and a loop is bad. Everyone knows he has these jumps, yet for some reason he popped the jumps



EV: Do I understand it right that Kolyada’s missing the 4S for the second time is not a big deal?

VC: If it was a jump he can’t do I would have replaced it long ago. But he has no troubles with the 4S in the practices – he lands it confidently. Hence when there is a mistake at the competition it’s a shame. Yet he can’t not jump at the competitions. Where would the polish the programme?



EV: I.e. you’ll risk again at the Europeans putting 3 different quads in the programme?

VC: That’s right



EV: Excuse me if I offend you, but for the last year I keep hearing talks about Kolyada needing to work with a more experienced coach and perhaps choreographer in order to improve. What do you think of these talks? It must reach you as well.

VC: Sure. First I was upset, because as far as I’m concerned those talks behind the coach’s back are not nice. As you can imagine those people tell me different things face to face: that Mikhail’s jumping technique is the best in Russia, his spins are the best, his gliding. Now I stopped paying attention – I have a wonderful pupil with whom we are working together and trust each other. That’s it.

I spent my whole life following the `don’t look for something even better from the good’. If Mikhails’ programmes are different, suit him well why would I doubt my choreographer’s work? Klushnichenko is a huge talent with an unusual approach, the athletes are interested working with her. I would never change her for any other choreographer.



EV: But there is an opinion you should change the `ruling hand’ from time to time so the athlete would have a chance to develop in different directions. It’s what everyone else are doing.

VC: Well, I did tell you about working with Lambiel, who we asked to work in order to add some new energy and we plan continuing the collaboration.



EV: Including choreographing the programmes?

VC: No, that we can do ourselves.



EV: I can’t help thinking you are kind of defending even though am not attacking. Don’t you want to see what would say, Lory Nicol be able to do with your athlete?

VC: If we get such a chance it’ll be Mikhail’s decision. But analyzing Kolyada’s sating I can tell you one thing for sure: all the current mishaps are not about the choreography, but about the jumps. I.e. it’s my work that is lacking, not the choreographer’s. And that’s what we’ll work on. What works least well.



EV: In our first conversation you admitted you were dreaming about the Olympics. Now your pupil is a 2 times National champion, the team leader. Do you have any new worries, fears – feelings you didn’t have before?

VC: Not yet. Perhaps I just didn’t have time to think of it. We’ll celebrate the new year, on 2/1 go to a week long training camp in Finland and on 8/1 move to Novogorsk to prepare to the Europeans. That’s all we are thinking about right now.
 
She's awesome. A bit different philosophy than Tutberidze. ;)

It's good to hear Kolyada at least is consistent with the 4sal in practice, because every time he falls, I bitch about how they need to take it out. :lol:

Nationals was a stunning success for Konstantinova, and I hope she'll get a crack at either Euros (if Med decides not to compete) or Worlds (if one of the 3 decides to rest after Olympics). For me, she has really softened the blow of losing Pogorilaya this season with her mature skating and big jumps.
 
Nationals was a stunning success for Konstantinova, and I hope she'll get a crack at either Euros (if Med decides not to compete) or Worlds (if one of the 3 decides to rest after Olympics). For me, she has really softened the blow of losing Pogorilaya this season with her mature skating and big jumps.
I hope exactly the opposite. She always seems to do well at home competitions, gets a good place at the nationals, and then she is sent to international competitions and has a meltdown. JGP last season, JGP this season, junior worlds last season... I am not writing her off for the future, but I don’t think she is ready yet. Does she really want to have a meltdown at her first Europeans, worlds or even Olympics? If they sent her to worlds and she does what she did last year at junior workds, it could also cost Russia the third spot. Having her on the team would mean that there is no room for error for the other two Russian ladies.
 
I hope exactly the opposite. She always seems to do well at home competitions, gets a good place at the nationals, and then she is sent to international competitions and has a meltdown. JGP last season, JGP this season, junior worlds last season... I am not writing her off for the future, but I don’t think she is ready yet. Does she really want to have a meltdown at her first Europeans, worlds or even Olympics? If they sent her to worlds and she does what she did last year at junior workds, it could also cost Russia the third spot. Having her on the team would mean that there is no room for error for the other two Russian ladies.

On the other side of the coin, she skated well at the Golden Spin of Zagreb just a few weeks prior. Perhaps she is gaining momentum? And with Euros in Moscow, perhaps this pattern could change.

Her performance quality has also gone up since the JGP event in Minsk, which wasn't a meltdown anyway and the scoring of the event was tight(she did fall at the end of her combo in the sp but was technically clean in the long). That being said, Tallinn and Warsaw were not great.

I personally enjoyed her performance at Russian Nationals the best out of the crowd. I love her power, speed, phrasing, and expressiveness
 
On the other side of the coin, she skated well at the Golden Spin of Zagreb just a few weeks prior. Perhaps she is gaining momentum? And with Euros in Moscow, perhaps this pattern could change.

Her performance quality has also gone up since the JGP event in Minsk, which wasn't a meltdown anyway and the scoring of the event was tight(she did fall at the end of her combo in the sp but was technically clean in the long). That being said, Tallinn and Warsaw were not great.

I personally enjoyed her performance at Russian Nationals the best out of the crowd. I love her power, speed, phrasing, and expressiveness
Don’t kid yourself. She skates well at home because she knows that home judges stand behind her. The international judges have no reason to want to help her. I hope she won’t be sent to Europeans, worlds or Olympics yet because failure at any of those competitions could have a huge impact on her long term. Same as it had on Pogorilaya. Loss of confidence would cause havoc with her jumps. I think skaters from those big federations should be sent to those big competitions only when they are ready, because if they don’t perform well, the federation will just give up on them and her career could go downhill. The federation would not admit that they messed up because they sent a skater who isn’t ready; they would blame the skater for being a headcase and not managing the pressure. And when someone falls out of favour, in crowded field like Russian ladies she may as well stop competing and go to shows, because she wouldn’t be getting international assignments.
 
It's really encouraging the Russian Fed didn't write off Konstantinova and Gubanova at Russian Nationals despite their nerviness on the JGP.

I was also thinking they may want to consider sending Tsurskaya instead, since she has a more extensive track record of scoring well internationally and has already gone above the 200s. Either way, it should be Konstantinova or Tsurskaya if the Russian Fed sends an alternate. LaTuk and Radio aren't showing any signs of deserving the spot more.
 
It's really encouraging the Russian Fed didn't write off Konstantinova and Gubanova at Russian Nationals despite their nerviness on the JGP.

I was also thinking they may want to consider sending Tsurskaya instead, since she has a more extensive track record of scoring well internationally and has already gone above the 200s. Either way, it should be Konstantinova or Tsurskaya if the Russian Fed sends an alternate. LaTuk and Radio aren't showing any signs of deserving the spot more.
I don’t think having a bad JGP event is bad enough for the federation to get upset about it. They had plenty of skaters in JGPF anyway. But messing up Worlds or Olympics may be a different matter.
 
She's awesome. A bit different philosophy than Tutberidze. ;)

It's good to hear Kolyada at least is consistent with the 4sal in practice, because every time he falls, I bitch about how they need to take it out. :lol:

Nationals was a stunning success for Konstantinova, and I hope she'll get a crack at either Euros (if Med decides not to compete) or Worlds (if one of the 3 decides to rest after Olympics). For me, she has really softened the blow of losing Pogorilaya this season with her mature skating and big jumps.
It is likely that Chebotareva's philosophy works better in the current men's field. It doesn't look like playing the long game in ladies will pay off any time in the near future, you will be beaten by the next 15 year old anyway. Otoh, there is no point in trying to push men to the limit pre-puberty and you are not going to get results overnight.
 
It is likely that Chebotareva's philosophy works better in the current men's field. It doesn't look like playing the long game in ladies will pay off any time in the near future, you will be beaten by the next 15 year old anyway. Otoh, there is no point in trying to push men to the limit pre-puberty and you are not going to get results overnight.
I think you are right. There is a huge difference between transitions from junior to senior level in ladies and men discipline. In ladies the move from junior to senior is relatively easy because the top juniors are doing exactly the same technical difficulty programs as the seniors - seven triples FS. In men there is a huge diffrence between junior and senior level of difficulty- top juniors usually have one quad, but not always. In senior men one quad is nothing - with only one quad a skater is average /under average in seniors. So that means, if let’s say Medvedeva or Zagitova keep consistently landing their jumps at the junior level and have consistently spins level 4, as long as they remain consistent, they will do well in seniors because there are no extra jumps or spins to learn. So Tutberidze knows that if she got a lady to the top in juniors, they will very likely do well in seniors (as long as they have no huge body change due to puberty, but she can fix that by putting them on a milkshake diet like she did with Lipnitskaya). In men, when Tutberidze got Pitkeev to the top in juniors, there was still a huge piece of work needed for him to be succesful in seniors. The same when Petrov was succesful in juniors, and then Aliev. So because it would extremely rare for a man to be immediately from top in juniors to the top in seniors the following season, more gentle approach from the coach may be needed so that they don’t get injured.
 
For me this interview is strange... I don't get it why they keep the 4S ... maybe they want to see a fall in every competition? Even though Kolyada lands it in practice this hasn't so much importance if he cannot do it consistently in competitions.
And I don't understand why she isn't opened to work with new choreographers. Nobody dismisses Olga's professionalism, she's certainly very good in what she's doing, but changes could open new directions/visions for Kolyada's skating.
Konstantinova's skating doesn't do much for me. I don't find her impressive in anything. She's rather an average skater in Russian ladies' landscape.
 
For me this interview is strange... I don't get it why they keep the 4S ... maybe they want to see a fall in every competition? Even though Kolyada lands it in practice this hasn't so much importance if he cannot do it consistently in competitions.
Because unless they put it into the programme and attempts to land it in a competition they will never know whether he can land it? Especially if he indeed does land it in the practices (and I assume he does). The GP events are the best place to try new things (in his case - Europeans and Russian nationals as well) - where else if not there?
 
There seems to be a big cultural difference in training camps in St Petersburg versus Moscow.

Elizaveta Tuktamysheva commented on it too in a recent interview.

http://fs-gossips.com/elizaveta-tuk...inue-to-skate-even-if-i-dont-get-to-olympics/

ET: But in Russia, especially in Moscow, it is a custom that we must fight, we must go to trainings and destroy. Maybe it’s right, but it’s not for me.

You said: “In Moscow,” is there a big difference between St. Petersburg and Moscow? In figure skating or in general?

ET: Yes, a big one. People are absolutely different, the atmosphere. In “Yubileiny” it is quiet, cozy, like at home, children, parents, everyone is nice. We live in our own world, there are no gossips … Of course, they are in any sport, but when we go to competitions and communicate with friends, it seems like a world of figure skating opens for us. (Laughs)
 
There seems to be a big cultural difference in training camps in St Petersburg versus Moscow.
I guess, it isn’t a difference only in training camps.
It may sound more like a stereotype but there truly is a big cultural difference between St Petersburg and Moscow due to many reasons (historical, based on population and the fact that Moscow is a capital city)
As Liza said, we here in St Petersburg value comfort, coziness, quiet and also take our time to apreciate beautiful things ;)
While Moscow is a huge megapolis, it’s still very diverse and interesting to explore but it’s always difficult for me to stay there for more than 5 days
 
I think that given the ups and downs of Liza T's career, it is a testament to her coaches and her training environment that she is so happy, mature, level headed and continues to enjoy skating. I think the Moscow training environment could have destroyed her.
 
I think that given the ups and downs of Liza T's career, it is a testament to her coaches and her training environment that she is so happy, mature, level headed and continues to enjoy skating. I think the Moscow training environment could have destroyed her.
Maybe. Or maybe she wouldn’t have so many ups and downs because she would be forced to work hard. After the season when she won the worlds, it seems to me that she has not been motivated enough. If she had someone more forceful who would make it clear that she will either work harder or leave, she may realise that skating actually means a lot to her and she would try harder. She is beaten by a skater who had a few years break from competing and lost her triples! One wonders why the same training environment enabled Kostner regain her jumps and skate better than Tuktamysheva.
 
Second option : she just might have quit. To each his own... Have you read the whole article?

It's nice to see longevity from a Russian lady. Rather than an all or nothing approach.

Also like Chebotareva says, not every coach has a conveyer belt of skaters and can hence afford to discard students - particularly former world champions.

I think part of good coaching is dealing with the tough times students face - and just not getting rid of them the moment there is a challenge.
 
Last edited:
It's nice to see longevity from a Russian lady. Rather than an all or nothing approach.

Also like Chebotareva says, not every coach has a conveyer belt of skaters and can hence afford to discard students - particularly former world champions.

I think part of good coaching is dealing with the tough times students face - and just not getting rid of them the moment there is a challenge.
I couldn’t have said it better!
 
Second option : she just might have quit. To each his own... Have you read the whole article?
Yes, I have read the whole article, but I am not sute if I agree with some parts she says. For example, she explains that in the last few years the ladies skating progressed a lot whereas she stayed at the same level. Well, that’s questionable. The ladies figure skating have progressed a lot, but her skating also went downhill. If she skated as well as she did a few years ago, she would be the one who would take the third spot. In the past she had harder 3-3, now she does only toeloop - toeloop. The year she was winning had triple axel which she doesn’t have now. She was also much more consistent. If she skated like she did a few years ago, maybe she wouldn’t be beating Medvedeva and Zagitova, but she would definitely be beating Sotskova, Tsurskaya and Radionova.
 
Yes, I have read the whole article, but I am not sute if I agree with some parts she says. For example, she explains that in the last few years the ladies skating progressed a lot whereas she stayed at the same level. Well, that’s questionable. The ladies figure skating have progressed a lot, but her skating also went downhill. If she skated as well as she did a few years ago, she would be the one who would take the third spot. In the past she had harder 3-3, now she does only toeloop - toeloop. The year she was winning had triple axel which she doesn’t have now. She was also much more consistent. If she skated like she did a few years ago, maybe she wouldn’t be beating Medvedeva and Zagitova, but she would definitely be beating Sotskova, Tsurskaya and Radionova.
She's got boobs, she's got hips, she had injuries.
And maybe she doesn't want it more than some others, and that's better that's way for the other competitors.
Not everyone is willing to shed blood on the ice to reach the top. As long as she doesn't whine afterwards, that's her choice, that's her life and who are we to pretend being in their hair or telling them how to act.

World peace
 
She's got boobs, she's got hips, she had injuries.
And maybe she doesn't want it more than some others, and that's better that's way for the other competitors.
Not everyone is willing to shed blood on the ice to reach the top. As long as she doesn't whine afterwards, that's her choice, that's her life and who are we to pretend being in their hair or telling them how to act.

World peace
Of course she has got boobs and hips, but she had those the year she won the worlds too.
If injuries are the problem, that would be indeed worrying because she underperformed five out of the seven seasons she has been skating in seniors. If someone is injured for five seasons iut of seven, then maybe it is time to re-evaluate whether the sport is worth it.
And that she doesn’t want it as much as the others- isn’t that exactly what I have been saying? Problems with motivation.
 
I really like Konstantinova’s skating. I have watched both her Russian Nationals programmes a good few times, I was surprised the judges went with her but to me she deserved it. I like her speed, power and athleticism, it’s nice to see different styles on the ice. In any other country (possibly bar Japan) she would walk on to their team and be in the reckoning for global medals but their is a strong chance she might never make a championship. I hold out a small hope tht she might get to Milan but I think the chance of it happening are remote.

In regards to Liza T, she will always be a world champion but I feel she could have achieved more. I was never her biggest fan but her programmes in 2015 were brilliant, the music, the choreo, the costumes () everything suited her perfectly. I was really happy to see her win everything that season and from then I was a fan. One of the big problems for me since has been the programmes, I don’t think her team know what to do with her. They have got outside choreographers but are then removing everything so she is left with dull, empty programmes. She fought back from Sochi disappointment, I wouldn’t rule her out doing it again.
 
I really don't understand why Russian FS federation is so supportive to Konstantinova given her inconsistency. And I don't think she should be anywhere near big teams unless she starts skating as she did at Nationals (or better, as she made a costly mistake in SP) on general basis. Her SB is quite high, almost 200 point, that should be enough for two GPs next year, so hopefully she will gain experience and show good performances there. And if there are a spot at Worlds team avaliable after the Olympics, I would much prefer Tsurskaya to get it. Of course, there will be Russian cup final (that's how Anna got her spot in 2014), and I hope Polina does well there. The reason of her inconsistency is not enough of training time as she fully started her preparation for the season only in September, and IMO she is much more trust worthy than Konstantinova at big events. Also, I wouldn't want to see Stasya going to JW again, and it may happen as the Russian judges are generous with her. In my opinion, girls from JGPF + Gubanova need and deserve it more, so I hope the judges won't go the same route as last year when they supported skaters that were old enough to go to seniors next season and were strict to younger ones.
As for Liza, I think motivation and package are her biggest problems. I don't know any other Russian skater who worked with as many choreographers (and good ones, even Wilson!) as her yet her programs are always the same. They are empty, with poor ice coverage and pretty much the same style. One could say that's Mishin's group problem, yet somehow they managed to give Samodurova two nice programs. I understand she probably can't skate a program as busy as Alina's, but she should look at Wakaba or Osmond (not much her LP though). They don't have crazy transitions and don't put all the elements in the second half, but their programs are much better. Also, IMO, she needs 3Lz-3T. With better package and this combination she probably could beat Sotskova even without that 3A
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information