RoseRed
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,165
I'm fairly certain there is not a legal obligation, as Solene was an adult at the time of the incident. The only mandatory reporting laws in Canada that I'm familiar with are for child abuse (which apply to minors under 16-18, depending on the province).The coach is a member of Skate Canada, and was a member of Skate Canada when the incident happened. That obliges them to follow Skate Canada policies, including the mandatory reporting policy.
And even if there was no legal obligation to report (although I'd argue there is), there is certainly a moral and ethical obligation to report, or at the very least to support a skater reporting an assault. What does it say about Marie-France as a person in a position of responsibility that one of her skaters told her about being assaulted, and she apparently did nothing about it?
There was certainly a moral and ethical obligation, I absolutely agree with you there.
Now the question for me (in terms of possible consequences) is whether M-F had an obligation to Skate Canada/OSIC to report. I lean towards no, for the reasons @Colonel Green gave.
Failure to report is listed as one type of misconduct covered by the Skate Canada policy, and the page on Skate Canada's site says this about the consequences for failing to report:
FAILURE TO REPORT An individual who knowingly fails to report a known actual or suspected behaviours or actions of misconduct pursuant to this Policy and the Procedure may be subject to disciplinary action, at the sole discretion of Skate Canada.
Skate Safe / Skate Canada would have had no jurisdiction or ability to impose any disciplinary action in terms of the this. Neither party involved is Canadian, the alleged perpetrator does not train in Canada, and it didn't happen in Canada. I assume Solene is/was not a member of a Skate Canada club either. If she was maybe that would change it a bit, though they still would be unable to do anything disciplinary to him, so I don't know if it would. Given that, I would guess that Marie-France would not have a duty to report to them, since they couldn't do anything about it. The policy defines reporting in terms of independent external authorities designated by Skate Canada. Which US Safe Sport would not be.Reporting means the provision of information in writing by an individual as outlined in this Policy to an independent external authority (i.e., Skate-Safe or Abuse-Free Sport, as applicable) as designated by Skate Canada to receive complaints regarding an alleged or suspected violation of this Policy
I did take a look at the policy, and had a few thoughts of other bits that might apply
- They mention the policy applying to "travel associated with Skate Canada activities" – I think this would not apply since neither party represents SC, and no Canadian dance teams were at the comp, so MF was not there associated with SC
- Neglect is one kind of maltreatment that falls under the policy. It is defined as "any pattern or a single serious incident of lack of reasonable care, inattention to an individual’s needs, nurturing or wellbeing, or omissions in care..." – the examples given don't fit with this case, but Solene could maybe make a complaint based on this
- Psychological maltreatment is defined as "any pattern or a single serious incident of deliberate conduct that has the potential to be harmful to a person’s psychological well-being, which includes…conduct that denies attention of support..." Lack of support is said to include "ignoring psychological needs" – again, the examples don't fit with this incident, but this could possibly apply if Solene made a complaint against MF
- It also says "This Policy applies to an individual’s action, conduct, and/or behaviour outside of SkateCanada’s business, activities, environment, and events when such conduct, action, and/or behaviour: adversely affects relationships within Skate Canada (and its work and sport environment); is detrimental to the image and reputation of Skate Canada; could undermine the integrity of sport; is sufficiently serious and significant as to be of importance to skating and/or of importance to the overall ability of Skate Canada to discharge its objectives; has a serious and detrimental impact on another individual" – you could claim the "detrimental to the image and reputation of Skate Canada" applies, and certainly the "serious and detrimental impact on another individual"
- Following the above, it says:
Important Note:The physical location(s) of where the actual and/or suspected act, conduct and/or behaviour occurred is not determinative. The applicability of the individual’s conduct outside of Skate Canada’s business, activities, and events will be determined by SkateCanada or by the external authorities as designated by Skate Canada, each at their sole discretion.
So I think there would be potential grounds to file a complaint against M-F, but I don't think she violated mandatory reporting to Skate Canada, given the jurisdictional issues.