I will respond to the rest later, but why exactly is this such a big deal Surely a skating judge knows the BVs of each jump?And does the judge need to do the math in their head about which jump has the highest base value if it might not be obvious?
Well wait actually.
This isn't what I mean though? I am saying, it makes no sense to score 3Lz+3T which includes a small 3Lz but a well done 3T on the base value of a 3Lz. If both are clean, then we are doing a good job marking GOE based off the 3T. And even if that 3Lz is e or < or <<, it still wouldn't matter, because my point would remain the same, that the 3T is well done, so give the GOE to that jump. Or if you want to give an overall deduction to it, then it still makes sense to deduct on the 3Lz(e)/</<<'s BV.How would your system work for judges to indicate to the computer which base value to apply to their positive or negative GOEs, falls aside?
Last edited: