One of the purposes of the Olympic movement is to bring athletes together from all over the world. From an Olympic perspective, it is better to include countries that may have only one Senior-level Pair Team than to give a country a second or third entry in the same discipline.
I totally understand that. But it's also about the best of the best as well. I am certainly not saying Kayne/O'Shea (the 1st alternates for the US) are the best of the best, but they are certainly better than, say, the Japanese pair (who didn't even qualify themselves). If K/O or whoever from the US represented AZE and competed at Nebelhorn they'd be in, but obviously there are many pairs left at home due to the country they represent (I/M-Canada, A/R-Russia for example, but these countries maxed out on entries). I am more concerned about the rules, where IMO, the US should have picked up a 2nd spot along the way. I just believe if Sk/k finished 12th that would be it for the US, but with this weird shift of giving spots there should be consideration. I would say the same for Mexico or Kaz or South Africa or wherever if that's the way last years world's went..