Didn't the CD serve a similar purpose as the QR in singles, in the sense that only X number of couples advanced past the CD round to the OSP/OD?I hadn't heard anything about reinstating the QR (please no) but the QR was only for singles, not pairs or dance.
There were qualifying/preliminary rounds for dance at worlds in 2011 and 2012.I hadn't heard anything about reinstating the QR (please no) but the QR was only for singles, not pairs or dance.
Oh right, now I remember, but that was only for the lower-ranked teams in the WS. The QR I'm thinking of was when all singles skaters had to qualify. I know the ISU has tinkered with it over the years but I think the current version (all skaters/teams skate the SP/RD and the top X qualify to FS/FD) is probably the most fair for the skaters and easier for the LOC. And the officials.There were qualifying/preliminary rounds for dance at worlds in 2011 and 2012.
Pairs had one in 2012.
What is the point of ice dance if teams aren’t having to learn set patterns? How do we compare teams completely like for like? The point of the pattern is to give teams a challenging series of steps that pushes them outside their comfort zone - without it we know clever coaching and choreo will be able to cover up weaknesses more easily.
My reaction exactly. Watching teams crisply and ably navigate the pattern is my favorite part of ice dance! Without it, all that is left are those boring flowy free programs.
Why do I think that the Gadbois school is probably behind this? They’ve never been big on teaching/perfecting those patterns, and I’m sure would rather not have to bother at all.
You mean like Moir's cheeky finger pointings and stuff? I find H/D's full-bodied dance and power skating to be much more satisfying, and accomplished.and V/M's was much better.
I feel like many fans really romanticize CDs and patterns— suggesting that judges actually used them to compare teams and rewarded skaters that actually did them better. IME, they were just as politically scored as free dances.What is the point of ice dance if teams aren’t having to learn set patterns? How do we compare teams completely like for like? The point of the pattern is to give teams a challenging series of steps that pushes them outside their comfort zone - without it we know clever coaching and choreo will be able to cover up weaknesses more easily.
I feel like many fans really romanticize CDs and patterns— suggesting that judges actually used them to compare teams and rewarded skaters that actually did them better. IME, they were just as politically scored as free dances.
No? When they are doing, let's say the Paso Double, they were not all doing the same steps?Actually it was 3 repetitions of the pattern, but the couples were not all skating the same pattern.
While I like closed hold skating, I also would like to see more types of dance shown on ice— and there are lots of dances where closed holds aren’t appropriate. I want to see thoughtful choreography where dancers have really researched their ideas and the choreography. No more just gliding next to each other and calling it contemporary.I just hope that if the lack of pattern is confirmed, the ISU make it a requirement to have one of the step sequences in the RD in closed hold. Otherwise, I fear ice dance is going to continues its trend into hand-in-hand skating with few true ice dance holds in sight.
To me, the lack of set pattern will make the discipline even more subjective than it already is and that the lack of reward for good technical skating and edgework will continue.
Not in the OSP. They would all skate in the Paso Doble theme, but had to create their own steps. That’s how the Golden Waltz was created, for example.No? When they are doing, let's say the Paso Double, they were not all doing the same steps?
I'd be OK with that - considering that ice dance emerged from ballroom dance, and that skating in closed hold and to a defined rhythm requires specific skills that aren't really being tested elsewhere. The FD provides plenty of opportunity to explore different types of dance. There are lots of different ballroom styles too - 26 patterns for international novice levels and above, so even grounding the RD in ballroom styles has potential for lots of variety.While I like closed hold skating, I also would like to see more types of dance shown on ice— and there are lots of dances where closed holds aren’t appropriate. I want to see thoughtful choreography where dancers have really researched their ideas and the choreography. No more just gliding next to each other and calling it contemporary.
Are you suggesting is that all RDs should be ballroom based?
I always liked Klimova/Ponomarenko's Charleston OSP!Very difficult.Betty Callaway pointed out the difficult parts.Not in the OSP. They would all skate in the Paso Doble theme, but had to create their own steps. That’s how the Golden Waltz was created, for example.
Not necessarily that they should all be ballroom based, but that the RD especially should showcase the technical side of ice dance. If the ISU do away with the pattern, I'd like to see more emphasis on the edgework, skating skills and variety of holds in that portion of the competition, not just hand-in-hand or very open skating (which some teams already have quite a lot of in their FDs.)While I like closed hold skating, I also would like to see more types of dance shown on ice— and there are lots of dances where closed holds aren’t appropriate. I want to see thoughtful choreography where dancers have really researched their ideas and the choreography. No more just gliding next to each other and calling it contemporary.
Are you suggesting is that all RDs should be ballroom based?
Exactly. If they insist on this move then the least they can do is alter the levels and goe requirements so that you get more points for having more technically challenging step sequences. I find close holds with variety are so much more pleasing to watch too.Not necessarily that they should all be ballroom based, but that the RD especially should showcase the technical side of ice dance. If the ISU do away with the pattern, I'd like to see more emphasis on the edgework, skating skills and variety of holds in that portion of the competition, not just hand-in-hand or very open skating (which some teams already have quite a lot of in their FDs.)
I also agree with @morqet 's post above, the free dance is open for teams to explore any style or choreography they want; personally I don't want the RD to just turn into a mini FD.
If we are honest ... ballroom dancing as a model doesn't work very well with the medium ice. When you look at ballroom dancing competitions, it's all stiff legs. How about allowing ice dancers to create their own "vocabulary" of steps on specific rhythms? Just an idea ... easily said than done (I know)!I'd be OK with that - considering that ice dance emerged from ballroom dance, and that skating in closed hold and to a defined rhythm requires specific skills that aren't really being tested elsewhere. The FD provides plenty of opportunity to explore different types of dance. There are lots of different ballroom styles too - 26 patterns for international novice levels and above, so even grounding the RD in ballroom styles has potential for lots of variety.
Me too, I used to love the really good teams on the compulsories.I just find a lot of the compulsories enjoyable to watch, period. The close holds and long swooping edges and classic look are just something we don't really see any more except in compulsories. So I will miss them if they're gone.
My number one wish for ice dance scoring is that they weight the GOE score in line with the level achieved on the element.Exactly. If they insist on this move then the least they can do is alter the levels and goe requirements so that you get more points for having more technically challenging step sequences. I find close holds with variety are so much more pleasing to watch too.
How do the ISU and skating feds make most of their money? Do they need money from audiences/ticket buyers/etc? Or is that just extra profit and money they get from governments/elsewhere enough? If they need fan money, are hardcore ice dance fans enough of a revenue stream?I don't understand why casual viewers should be dictating the technical requirements. For the most part, networks didn't televise school figures or compulsory dances, so the casual viewer wouldn't see them on network TV. They could always skip the RD's if they wanted to, just like now. Similar to CDs or OSPs. And casual viewers wouldn't have to watch those streams, either.
That’s funny considering H/D’s Janet Jackson was pretty much a dupe of V/M’s Prince.
I liked both.
and V/M's was much better.
I feel like many fans really romanticize CDs and patterns— suggesting that judges actually used them to compare teams and rewarded skaters that actually did them better. IME, they were just as politically scored as free dances.
Have we seen Piper and Paul perform the March? I was looking for a video of it but couldn’t find one:/ would love to see itI want to see Gilles and Poirier’s new pattern so if they have to eliminate the pattern portion do it after theirs is performed one season.
For me, I find the RD way too broad in what they allow teams to perform. I want them to restrict the type of music and dance they can perform, whatever the theme is for that year.
I wouldn’t say it was a dupe as much as HD (and their team) learned from what worked and didn’t work across the SDs from the 2016/2017. They went a similar direction as VM’s Prince with packaging fully dedicated to/inspired by one artist. Admittedly I was skeptical after their first couple outings with it, but you can tell they loved their material and by the end of the season were skating it confidentially and excellently.That’s funny considering H/D’s Janet Jackson was pretty much a dupe of V/M’s Prince.
I liked both.