I think it’s already been mentioned, and it’s possible I’m wrong, but this positive doping test does not fall under the IOC’s jurisdiction because the positive test did not happen at the Olympic Games.RUSADA does not get to do whatever they want. The ISU and IOC's authority both supersede it, and the case they brought to CAS (along with WADA) to uphold Valieva's suspension at the Olympics would have been bulletproof had it not been for the "untimely reporting" of the results, as cited by CAS in their decision. None of those entities support slap-on-the-wrist punishments for doping violations, even by minors.
It was an in competition positive test and the jurisdiction now falls under RUSADA. Due to the fact that she is a protected person, there is a lot of leeway in her punishment which as I said, can be a reprimand or a suspension length that they deem appropriate.
The only reason the IOC was involved now was because the positive test resulted during the Olympic Games and the issue of her suspension and the awarding of medals came into play.
In light of grandpa’s cup coming under suspicion as a possible contaminant, it would not be shocking to me to have RUSADA consider this an accidental contamination and give a minimal suspension length.