However, those arguing the false accusations scenario are actually doing the boys will be boys defense of "one moment of time shouldn't ruin lives". To me that indicates they believe that the incident happened and are just excusing it.
Every time someone says, I support/believe victims BUT...remember the but negates everything that came before
OK.. So using this logic, and applying the very same thing to the Prime Minister of Canada... you both believe that he should be removed from his job based on the historic accusations against him. (One had a signed NDA, the other did not). Is that correct?