You can ignore the facts all you want, and believe everything you hear on CNN if you want- keep your head in the sand.
Red pills do leave a bitter taste don't they. Particularly when the person taking them gets caught out.Oh, the irony
Declaring a statute void is part of judicial review. It’s only activism if there is nothing in law or constitution that would actually justify it. There is a legislative remedy for the ACA case- making the penalty more than zero. Very simple and easy. So the Supreme Court isn’t going to strike down the whole law when they know democrats will make the penalty thousands of dollars.Quick question.
Does does getting rid of the legislatively created ACA and non-discrimination statutes that tell businesses, hospitals, and other entities that serve the general public they can't discriminate on the basis of LGBTQ status "judicial restraint"? That word is becoming meaningless, especially when people who use it only use when it comes to the more "controversial" civil rights cases but don't pay attention when the same judges who are lauded for judicial restraint by those with selective reading don't practice such things in other kinds of cases....watch when there are laws passed by a Dem Congress....let's see how restrained Barrett is. I refuse to call her ACB because she quite frankly isn't badass or cool enough to have a nickname. Also, I'm from New Orleans, and she validates every fear I have of the New Orleans Catholic School education system. All of my friends back home say the same thing.
Just because it's not being covered on the national news doesn't mean nothing is happening.
Biden is going to win the election. Its not close enough for courts change it.
Is everything going to be sunshine and roses then? Hardly. But Trump will leave office and Biden will be sworn in January 20, 2021.
I shall, again, leave the fretting to others.
But did you know he likes beer?I'm not saying there is no advocacy or activism. I'm saying MSM coverage helps put pressure on the opposition (usually Republicans). Democrats still fight, introduce bills and sign reform laws, I'm not aware of Republicans still being for change. They seem to have settled back into their routine of pretending America doesn't have a problem with racism.
In other news: in his opinion on opposing extending the deadline in Wisconsin, Kavanaugh cited Vermont as a state that had not made changes to their election rules. They did and now the Vermong Secretary of State has asked that the opinion be corrected. Awkward. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/28/politics/vermont-kavanaugh-voting/index.html
I realize this stuff has become business as usual since 2016, but it's not that she appeared with the President. It's because she appeared with the President at the White House so he could use it for political purposes and she went along with it. There is a reason the other justices weren't there and I'm betting it's because they at least have basic respect for boundaries and an awareness of conflicts of interest and appearances.Yet the sky is falling because Barrett appeared with the President. Oh my!
There is a meme on FB saying to wear pearls on Nov. 3 to honor RBG. Pass it on.....
I don't go anywhere, but if I do Tuesday, I made a note to wear my (fake) pearl earrings anyway.
Thank the Goddess. Even the Trumpests who thought everything Obama had to go have come to realize they did not want to lose health care. Now, hopefully Biden and the Congress can put partisanship on this one thing aside and make it better