BlueRidge
AYS's snark-sponge
- Messages
- 60,450
How should history be used politically? How should it be taught at different levels in schools?
I saw a comment recently from a history teacher in a state where Republicans were passing legislation to ban teaching Critical Race Theory who said, "I just put the facts out there and let the students decide for themselves?"
Does anyone believe that is even possible?
Here's a look at history and the teaching of it:
The Fog of History Wars (New Yorker)
What is "good" history?
I saw a comment recently from a history teacher in a state where Republicans were passing legislation to ban teaching Critical Race Theory who said, "I just put the facts out there and let the students decide for themselves?"
Does anyone believe that is even possible?
Here's a look at history and the teaching of it:
The Fog of History Wars (New Yorker)
Once again, Americans find themselves at war over their history—what it is, who owns it, how it should be interpreted and taught. In April, the Department of Education called for a renewed stress, in the classroom, on the “unbearable human costs of systemic racism” and the “consequences of slavery.” In response, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell issued a formal letter, demanding more “patriotism” in history and calling the Democrats’ plan “divisive nonsense.” Like all great questions of national memory, the latest history war has to play out in politics, whether we like it or not. This is especially true as we limp, wounded, from the battlefields of the Trump era, when facts were nearly rendered irrelevant.
History wars follow patterns. The subjects at their core usually carry visceral meaning for large swaths of the public. The disputes quickly invoke curricula, creeping into school boards and state legislatures with increasing stakes. The combatants then employ a kind of existential rhetoric, with all sides declaring surrender unacceptable. Political teams are chosen, and the media both fuels and thrives on the contestation. Authorities, whether in academia, libraries, or museums, try to fight for up-to-date research and interpretation. The politics of knowledge and the emotional attachments to country threaten to sweep up nearly all before them. Finally, someone declares victory, whether by creating or removing a monument, cancelling or curating an exhibit, or writing a book about a triumph of historical engagement. “Good” history can be both a result and a casualty of these wars.
What is "good" history?