IOC lifts ban on Belarus, ban on Russia continues

This is sophistry, and you are too intelligent not to know it. The bombing of the girls' elementary school took place four years after the exclusion of Russian athletes from ISU competitions. It cannot be a cause of the expulsion.

Your reference to that bombing was a gratuitous insertion of your personal political beliefs into a skating thread, something for which anyone other than an administrator might be reprimanded.
You don’t think that reminding folks that Russia is no longer alone in its Olympic season war-mongering is ok? I’m perfectly fine with criticism and being an admin has nothing to do with where I stand on this, so criticize away. I’ve been anti-Russian since well before the Ukraine invasion (despite having rooted for some Russian skaters in the past) and I didn’t want any of them at the Olys. I’m just being sensitive to a charge of hypocrisy, as an American.
 
This is sophistry, and you are too intelligent not to know it. The bombing of the girls' elementary school took place four years after the exclusion of Russian athletes from ISU competitions. It cannot be a cause of the expulsion.
The Minab bombing happened during the Olympic truce that was hence breached (it was breached as soon as Iran was attacked). In the Olympic charter, military attacks during the Olympic truce are a cause of exclusion. Russia was banned for such a breach, America is not. Something is wrong here. Either Russia should never have been banned, either the US should be. That's what @PRlady's post made me think of. And this doesn't belong to PI because it's tightly linked to the original subject.
 
The Minab bombing happened during the Olympic truce that was hence breached (it was breached as soon as Iran was attacked). In the Olympic charter, military attacks during the Olympic truce are a cause of exclusion. Russia was banned for such a breach, America is not. Something is wrong here. Either Russia should never have been banned, either the US should be. That's what @PRlady's post made me think of. And this doesn't belong to PI because it's tightly linked to the original subject.
As has been pointed out MANY times during the past 4 years since Russia was banned for invading Ukraine, this was the THIRD time in a span of 15 years that Russia violated the Olympic Truce.

1) August 2008 - invaded Georgia a week before the start of the Beijing Summer Olympics
2) March 2014 - invaded Crimea during the period between the Sochi Winter Olympics & Paralympics
3) February 2022 - invaded Ukraine less than a week following the conclusion of the Beijing Winter Olympics

The IOC did not take any action until the third, most obvious & destructive invasion by Putin. The comparison you and many other sad, little anti-Israel/America folks, doesn't hold water unless you can provide at least two other examples of those countries initiating armed conflict during the Olympic Truce period in the last 15 years. We all know you can't, so please, don't bring this garbage talking point into this thread and leave it to PI instead.
 
I didn’t realize that there was a three-strikes-you’re out law, and that any entity needs to wait for any number of transgressions going forward once they decide to finally enforce their own rules. Good to know.
Ah, yes, the rules are black & white & there's absolutely no nuance or ability to measure the degree of the violation before the rules MUST be applied. Are we all five suddenly?

The IOC chose to turn the other cheek and only made the decision to ban Russia once the violation was so egregious it could not be ignored. But, yes, the US attack on Iran is exactly the same & must receive the same exact punishment because we live in a five-year old's world of whataboutism.
 
Hmm.....Russia makes a lousy participant. Of the several substance infractions including Sochi - have they ever admitted to any of it? Russia`s like a unrepetant teenager. Parents who can`t be honest about this are going to live in a state of denial and excuse making. I`m embarassed for the ISU - once again caving.
 
Last edited:
Ah, yes, the rules are black & white & there's absolutely no nuance or ability to measure the degree of the violation before the rules MUST be applied. Are we all five suddenly?

The IOC chose to turn the other cheek and only made the decision to ban Russia once the violation was so egregious it could not be ignored. But, yes, the US attack on Iran is exactly the same & must receive the same exact punishment because we live in a five-year old's world of whataboutism.
Karen, a lot of people here were talking everyone else down reiterating over and over that because the 2022 Russia incident was during the Olympic truce, that is the sole reason why they were banned. I’ll pull the receipts of those threads and the posters saying the same thing over and over.

Now, it gets all twisted to having to commit more than one offense, or it’s because of state-sponsored sports, or because of whatever else.

Either equal application of the rules or why have rules at all? And for our spreadsheet queen of the application of the rules, I’d think you’d agree.
 
The comparison you and many other sad, little anti-Israel/America folks, doesn't hold water unless you can provide at least two other examples of those countries initiating armed conflict during the Olympic Truce period in the last 15 years. We all know you can't, so please, don't bring this garbage talking point into this thread and leave it to PI instead.
You're talking to someone who's hold dual citizenship for 62 years and who counts many Jewish ancestors and relatives, some living in Israël. Many countries breached the Olympic truce and were not sanctionned. That doesn't mean it makes it OK to go on. I've never attacked you personally so I ask you to do the same and to not accuse me of any preposterous anti-any nation feelings. You don't agree with what I wrote? Fine with me. But keep it civil and put a leash on that agressivness I certainly don't deserve. Thank you in advance. I happen to have you as one of my fave FSU posters although we have diametrically opposed opinions on at least one subject that I would never bring to you out of respect. Again I'm entitled to the same respect in return.
 
Last edited:
You're talking to someone who's hold dual citizenship for 62 years and who counts many Jewish ancestors and relatives, some living in Israël. Many countries breached the Olympic truce and were not sanctionned. That doesn't mean it makes it OK to go on. I've never attacked you personally so I ask you to do the same and to not accuse me of any preposterous anti-any nation feelings. You don't agree with what I wrote? Fine with me. But keep it civil and put a leash on that agressivness I certainly don't deserve. Thank you in advance. I happen to have you as one of my fave FSU posters although we have diametrically opposed opinions on at least one subject that I would never bring to you out of respect. Again I'm entitled to the same respect in return.
I apologize and am sorry you thought this was a personal attack. It wasn't.

The comparison many Russia apologists make between their ban and the lack of a ban for the US & Israel is filled with many holes. Sure, I can see, superficially, that the same violation occurred but that doesn't make the offenses equal in the sense that the IOC chose to look the other way with Russia not once but twice before they finally banned them in 2022. Nor does it take into consideration the ill-will Russia had brought upon itself in the immediate aftermath of the Beijing Winter Olympics 4 years ago with yet ANOTHER doping scandal.

The violation of the Olympic Truce was a very convenient, legally sound reason to ban Russia and CAS upheld the decision as a result, but we all know the IOC had been trying, since the Sochi doping scandal broke, to ban them for the systemic, state-sponsored doping schemes. Furthermore, with the election of Kirsty Coventry last summer as IOC President, the writing has been on the wall with regard to the ban remaining intact for much longer than it has stood.

I don't like the lifting of the ban because the circumstances for the ban as expressed by the IOC still remain, but I think we'd all do ourselves a favor by taking the "whataboutism" of the US-Israel military actions out of this thread. It's a distraction. Neither Israel nor the US have the stench of systemic, state-sponsored doping schemes hanging over them and certainly no one has accused the USA or USOPC of major doping violations that led to our record-setting gold medal haul in Milano-Cortina, nor did Alysa Liu have a positive doping test result crop up between the Team Event & the Women's Event to cast a dark cloud over the entire competition.

I don't know that Russia would have necessarily been banned in 2022 had the Valieva scandal not tarnished the Winter Olympics' most prestigious figure skating event. I waver on the question when I ponder it. On the one hand, the invasion of Ukraine really upset the rest of Europe and Europeans carry a lot of influence in the IOC and many international sports federations; but by the same token, the IOC turned a blind eye to the invasion of Crimea in 2014 which was almost as egregious as the direct invasion of Ukraine 4 years ago. Ultimately, Putin gave the IOC the excuse they were looking for to ban Russia.

So, here we are, four years later, and it just feels, at least to me, like the IOC is moving to lift the ban not because they ever really cared about the war but because they've exacted their punishment on Russia at long last for the multitude of doping scandals in the last dozen years.
 
I don’t think it’s any one factor lifting the ban. I think the raising of age limits gives the ISU CYA material against more tormented 15 year olds winning gold medals. As Karen points out, most of the Russian quadsters have lost them by their later teenaged years; Trusova is a unicorn and Valieva will never skate internationally again.

The Iran war provides another reason whether people like it or not, it was a war of choice. (And btw I personally don’t equate it with invading Ukraine to take over the country and incorporate it into Russia, it’s bad but not that bad.)

But most of all it’s that I think the IOC PWB just think one quad of exclusion is enough.
 
"Whataboutism" is a fascist term. Because it denies equality and same standards.

Russia was banned illegally and must get its flag, anthem and quotas it had before banning. For individual assignments like GP there should be a special provision. Why gymnasts and synchro swimmers can compete with flag but figure skaters cannot. Because ISU is the worst sport organisation.
 
Disappointing, as nothing has changed, not surprising though, the world in general seems to moving away from peacefulness. Once Kirsty Coventry was elected the IOC president it was only a matter of time before Russia were brought back.
 
For individual assignments like GP there should be a special provision.
A provision for what? Open the floodgates and allow the top 5 at Nationals all two events?

Nah. But I do think both Petrosian and Gummenik should be at the absolute top of the alternates lists now, because they did in fact earn spots properly but didn't get them because of the timing.

And also of note: if the Russians are so much better than the fields competing now, they can show that in early Challenger events and also shoot up to the top of the alternates lists that way.
 
And also of note: if the Russians are so much better than the fields competing now, they can show that in early Challenger events and also shoot up to the top of the alternates lists that way.
Precisely. And, Karen is wrong about all the Russian women losing their quads after puberty. Some do. Some don't. And some don't have them but are competitive with the top skaters (Anna Frolova for example). But, they'll have their chance to compete just like everybody else. And, don't think Valieva won't be in international competition. She's free to compete and is on the senior team for the Moscow fed. She looks strong. So, why don't you all just wait for the test skates. Juniors at the end of the month then the seniors. These will determine who gets to go to a challenger. Then you can clutch your pearls.
 
Precisely. And, Karen is wrong about all the Russian women losing their quads after puberty. Some do. Some don't. And some don't have them but are competitive with the top skaters (Anna Frolova for example). But, they'll have their chance to compete just like everybody else. And, don't think Valieva won't be in international competition. She's free to compete and is on the senior team for the Moscow fed. She looks strong. So, why don't you all just wait for the test skates. Juniors at the end of the month then the seniors. These will determine who gets to go to a challenger. Then you can clutch your pearls.
Valieva will not be in international competition as long as Russians are required to compete as AINs. There is no way she would pass any AIN review since she served as one of Putin's main propaganda puppets for at least two years following the invasion. She has a video of her with Putin pinned to one of her social media accounts still.
 
I apologize and am sorry you thought this was a personal attack. It wasn't.

Thank you 😉 It was hard not to take it as such as you said "you". You lumped me up with anti-American and anti-Israël (aka antisemite) people and I took it badly because I'm really not. For personal reasons, one of them being family heritage, it was deeply insulting to me. I'd react the same to the IOC and ISU decisions if it was Papoua New Guinea, Mozambique, or even France that were concerned. I also make a difference between the people and the government of a country. But OK, apologize happily accepted.
The comparison many Russia apologists make between their ban and the lack of a ban for the US & Israel is filled with many holes.
It is but finding it unfair is not being a Russia apologist. At least, I am not. Russia, as a political entity, is inexcusable both for its military attacks and the way it treats its athletes.
Sure, I can see, superficially, that the same violation occurred but that doesn't make the offenses equal in the sense that the IOC chose to look the other way with Russia not once but twice before they finally banned them in 2022.
I fully agree they should have been banned before. Citing the reason for the recent ban doesn't mean I think that there was no reason before.
Nor does it take into consideration the ill-will Russia had brought upon itself in the immediate aftermath of the Beijing Winter Olympics 4 years ago with yet ANOTHER doping scandal.

The violation of the Olympic Truce was a very convenient, legally sound reason to ban Russia and CAS upheld the decision as a result, but we all know the IOC had been trying, since the Sochi doping scandal broke, to ban them for the systemic, state-sponsored doping schemes.
Not that it excuses the IOC sudden new concern for breach of OT, but I assume it's very difficult to address state-sponsored doping. It's an internal problem within a sovereign state. How do you get in there besides testing athletes AND being ahead of masking agents, something WADA can't keep up with? All in all, banning Russia from international competitions for 4 years doesn't solve the problem. For all we know, Russian athletes may still be doped up to their eyeballs.

So, here we are, four years later, and it just feels, at least to me, like the IOC is moving to lift the ban not because they ever really cared about the war but because they've exacted their punishment on Russia at long last for the multitude of doping scandals in the last dozen years.
I think the main concern of IOC and ISU is business and money. They want more viewers, more people attending competitions. The return of Russians skaters will be a drawing card for the next seasons.
 
Last edited:
The IOC chose to turn the other cheek and only made the decision to ban Russia once the violation was so egregious it could not be ignored. But, yes, the US attack on Iran is exactly the same & must receive the same exact punishment because we live in a five-year old's world of whataboutism.
They killed over 100 children in an inexcusable "mistake." That's pretty horrendous to me and I'd be fine with the US being banned from IOC-controlled sports for a while.
 
A provision for what? Open the floodgates and allow the top 5 at Nationals all two events?
No. Russia and Belarus were banned illegally. When something illegal is done, you go back to where it was to restore the justice. Both countries must get back their flags, anthems, officials, etc. and all quotas they had before banning. The athletes who had the right for GP assignments must get them back. Based on the fact that other athletes illegally couldn't compete last season to earn GP assignments, some host picks should be given to them. I would go with one in each segment for the entire GP, not for each GP. That is what a special GP provision is. The rule for returnees is not applicable. They changed it from 10 to 4 years to avoid individual lawsuits from athletes due to generic terms in the rule. But it's not applicable for anyone except returnees.
 
Valieva will not be in international competition as long as Russians are required to compete as AINs. There is no way she would pass any AIN review since she served as one of Putin's main propaganda puppets for at least two years following the invasion. She has a video of her with Putin pinned to one of her social media accounts still.
Lol. I just see how ISU denies her an AIN status for having video with Putin. The internet will be flooded with videos/pictures of athletes with countries' leaders who started wars. Guess what country will be in the lead. Right, USA. Even dumb ISU will not go that straight road to CAS to lose. You are desperate.
 
The precedent for creating and enforcing specific political requirements for AIN status was already established at the Olympics. The ISU is following the same rules that the IOC set.

Now if Russia wants to take the IOC to CAS for not enforcing the Olympic truce provisions of the IOC Constitution against any other countries, let them have at it.
 
No. Russia and Belarus were banned illegally. When something illegal is done, you go back to where it was to restore the justice. Both countries must get back their flags, anthems, officials, etc. and all quotas they had before banning. The athletes who had the right for GP assignments must get them back. Based on the fact that other athletes illegally couldn't compete last season to earn GP assignments, some host picks should be given to them. I would go with one in each segment for the entire GP, not for each GP. That is what a special GP provision is. The rule for returnees is not applicable. They changed it from 10 to 4 years to avoid individual lawsuits from athletes due to generic terms in the rule. But it's not applicable for anyone except returnees.
Seriously people, which one of you let the doors of the funny farm unlocked?? Now we'll get in trouble with all the neighborhood because the troll is running around freely and peeing and pooping in everyone's garden ! :2faced:
 
Lol. I just see how ISU denies her an AIN status for having video with Putin. The internet will be flooded with videos/pictures of athletes with countries' leaders who started wars. Guess what country will be in the lead. Right, USA. Even dumb ISU will not go that straight road to CAS to lose. You are desperate.
Don’t think I have seen any other active skaters so knee deep in politics as Valieva. Pretty sure she has promoted the military youth movement and the kidnapping of Ukrainian children.
 
nor did Alysa Liu have a positive doping test result
Why should she. She has the same diagnosis as Biles, made it herself a public knowledge. It's safe to assume she has the same TUE as Biles because that is how their diagnosis is treated. It's impossible to test positive if you have TUE. Biles proved in Tokyo that without her light meth she can't really compete. If the OC 2026 had been in Tokyo, Alysa might have had the same "success" as Biles. They are both fakes.
It's on WADA. They issue TUE on light meth that can seriously impact athletes' health but they ban over the counter pills that actually protect athletes' hearts in order not to die at the age of 58. Because WADA is not a sport organisation but a political one.
 
Don’t think I have seen any other active skaters so knee deep in politics as Valieva. Pretty sure she has promoted the military youth movement and the kidnapping of Ukrainian children.
I don't believe that people with the Internet don't know what Zelensky's dogs are doing to his own citizens. It's hypocrisy that belongs to PI. I don't post in PI on principle of Mathew about pearls and swine. I am not sorry.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top