Reuven
Official FSU Alte Kacher
- Messages
- 16,997
Does Post cost anything?
No, it doesn't cost anything. There are no ads. They give you $50.00 in something that I guess is called tip money that you can use to reward posts you like or pay to see an article that might be behind a paywall. I haven't spent any of my $50.00 yet. I want to dole it out carefully.Does Post cost anything?
I’ve been on counter.social since its beginning. I do like it, but I find it’s a lot easier to use on my iMac than iPad, but the community is lovely. I’m on the waitlist for Post.I find Post very easy to use and less confusing than Counter Social or Mastodon.
He’s lost any sense of humility and touch with reality. He’s entered mad scientist mode except I’m not very convinced he’s much a scientist himself. Just a guy who has enough money to pay for actual smart people (but probably won’t listen to them or has only “yes men” he “listens” to).Apparently, he's also claiming his phone will work on Mars.
Um. Yeah.
In an age of stagnant politics and growing anxiety about the future, it’s an attractive and even comforting story. It’s also one that few figures have leveraged quite as successfully as Elon Musk — who has, for years, projected an image of promethean genius that countless millions have found singularly compelling. Given Musk’s actual behavior, his cringeworthy social media presence, his company’s incessant product recalls (the latest being this very week), and his litany of grandiose pronouncements that have amounted to nothing, it can sometimes be difficult to get your head around. Nonetheless, the roughly one-month period that has elapsed since his takeover of Twitter has probably done more damage to his image — and to the fraudulent and self-serving myths of Silicon Valley it draws on — than any of these things ever could.
At a certain point, even the most devoted Musk sycophants will have to ask what the master plan is beyond erratic public behavior and lazily trolling the libs. Eventually, a few may even arrive at the same conclusion skeptics reached long ago: that there’s no great promethean genius, elaborate game of multidimensional chess, or modern day philosopher king hiding behind the Mars talk, product recalls, and epic bacon memes. All that exists behind the curtain is a garden-variety capitalist doing the kinds of things that capitalists have always done — in this case very badly.
He asked why Apple isn't advertising more on Twitter and if they believe in free speech.He appealed directly to Apple's CEO - asking: "What's going on here @tim_cook?"
And I'm pretty sure they are not the ones who by EVs. A lot of the people who do buy the more expensive EVs are the ones who dislike Musk and realize that "there’s no great promethean genius, elaborate game of multidimensional chess, or modern day philosopher king hiding behind the Mars talk, product recalls, and epic bacon memes." Or, if they didn't know that before, they do now. My friends who plan to buy nice EVs insist that they will not buy Teslas. Of course, they live in the Bay Area and were familiar with Musk before his recent post-acquisition moves and statements. So, he lost them quite some time ago. It's just that more potential EV purchasers are joining them.The following quote is what I’ve suspected of Musk’s most devoted fans…that a huge part of his appeal is trolling the libs and other “enemies” but they don’t have the foresight to care about anything else.
Wow, that would be really useful to meApparently, he's also claiming his phone will work on Mars.
Um. Yeah.
The beginning of the article is correct. He's the living example of Dunning-Kruger Effect.From day one, this entire saga has been a story of a man with far more money than brains. After all, this all started when Musk stupidly offered to buy Twitter at a price way over its valuation, for no other reason than a fit of trollish pique. It was only after he realized what a foolish idea it was to set $44 billion on fire that he started coming up with disingenuous excuses to escape the deal, only to discover that it was too late, legally, to back out.
And to my point that just because you were proven to be good at a specific skill or area doesn't mean you are all-of-a-sudden God's gift to the World who was meant to lead the rest of us nobodies who you are so clearly superior than:Yet, somehow, much of this still feels surprising. The idea that Musk is "smart" has persisted through years of very public evidence to the contrary. Even now, many of his critics offer pre-emptive caveats that they don't think he's stupid, before explaining why the latest of his endless string of idiotic choices is a bad one. This notion of Musk's intelligence clings to the discourse around him for one simple reason: He is very, very rich.
The myth of the American meritocracy is a stubborn one. Americans can't help but believe that someone as rich as Musk must have something going on for him beyond dumb luck. To imagine otherwise is too unsettling. So many people block out what should be an obvious truth: You probably would have never heard of Elon Musk if he wasn't a white man from a wealthy family that literally owned an emerald mine in South Africa.
But that's what these types do. They think because they show some extraordinary gift (with Musk, not sure if he displayed that) at something (especially if it's STEM-related or a subject matter that the mostly white male privileged business world deems respectable as opposed to those humanities and liberal arts subjects), it means they are like Gods among peons.Musk wasn't a total birdbrain. His resume suggests there was a time when he was relatively competent at computer science, though there's no reason to think that such skills mean fluency in any other higher-functioning tasks. But regardless of what some IQ test from back in the day might have said about Musk, it's clear that in the past couple of decades, his brain has turned to total mush.
I think I agree with the article that America isn't a meritocracy (no country is), but I did try to search for Elon Musk's emerald mine thing this time, because I keep seeing it and wanted to find out the details, but it's on snopes, actually: https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/11/17/elon-musk-emerald-mine/Elon Musk's Epic Bumbling is a Daily Reminder that America is Not a Meritocracy
The beginning of the article is correct. He's the living example of Dunning-Kruger Effect.
And to my point that just because you were proven to be good at a specific skill or area doesn't mean you are all-of-a-sudden God's gift to the World who was meant to lead the rest of us nobodies who you are so clearly superior than:
But that's what these types do. They think because they show some extraordinary gift (with Musk, not sure if he displayed that) at something (especially if it's STEM-related or a subject matter that the mostly white male privileged business world deems respectable as opposed to those humanities and liberal arts subjects), it means they are like Gods among peons.
This whole meritocracy myth is not only stubborn, but it's VERY dangerous as these types of people play with people's livelihoods and ability to make a living, thrive, or even survive in the world. And these types are the ones pushes to the top in very important industry and even governmental office, then they make a muck out of everything, but find some scapegoat to blame because you can always rely on people's hatred of "others".
But you know...so long as they "own the libs" I guess they're worth more than the rest of us.
I was looking more into it and it seems there's enough space in Musk's denial for people to infer all sorts of things in both defending Elon Musk as a "self-made" billionaire or in pushing a narrative that he was someone who actually did benefit from wealth.I think I agree with the article that America isn't a meritocracy (no country is), but I did try to search for Elon Musk's emerald mine thing this time, because I keep seeing it and wanted to find out the details, but it's on snopes, actually: https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/11/17/elon-musk-emerald-mine/
Snopes doesn't deny that Musk's father Errol owned a stake in an emerald mine in Zambia. It denies that it was an "apartheid mine in South Africa", states that Errol was an engineer (instead of "slave owner"), and tries to search for evidence about how much of Musk's wealth was based off this emerald mine, and documents many of Musk's own denials.I guess regarding his fame, it's true that his dad did partially own an emerald mine in Zambia and the story has gained so much traction that people started using it in all sorts of promotional and hit pieces against him and it garnered him a some fame and publicity. It's not the only reason why we know him, but it added to his "mystique" one way or the other.
But given that people were let go without a formal severance package to be told they would get the details later, it's possible that they aren't going to get their severance either.A source says Twitter didn't make payroll on time in Germany and the UK:
Anyone who could have taken that 3-month severance offer and didn't ... is going to live to regret it. IMO.
It's almost a cliche around my town that at least one City Council candidate and/or one School Board candidate will be a software engineer who say you should vote for them because they are a software engineer so they know how to be analytical. Or something like that. I absolutely never vote for them because I've seen too many of those types and I know how little-suited they are for these positions.But that's what these types do. They think because they show some extraordinary gift (with Musk, not sure if he displayed that) at something (especially if it's STEM-related or a subject matter that the mostly white male privileged business world deems respectable as opposed to those humanities and liberal arts subjects), it means they are like Gods among peons.
People who are really into Twitter say that the stuff on the right like What's Happening are also having issues.I get Twitter notifications in my e-mail once or twice a day of Twitter posts of people I follow. But in the last two days, there have been posts sent to me that are not from people I follow. And both those posts were spam, like "hot Russian woman looking for man" kind of spam. To me, when my avatar photo is actually of me and I'm clearly not someone they should be sending this kind of spam to.So I'd say the screening process is breaking down.