alchemy void
Post-its for the win.
- Messages
- 27,291
Scrolling through Twitter today, I was a little surprised by the visceral reaction to Paul's commentary at 4CC.
They think he's clueless, boring, talks too much, lacks precision, mispronounces everything, and repetitive. Jackie Wong, for example, seems to really be annoyed with his surface-level commentary.
I totally get it, but I find him harmless enough and I enjoy enough of his aloof Brit snark to find him a net positive. He just doesn't bother me much. I'd prefer him over Tracy/Rod, or Johnny/Tara most of the time.
I have a hunch that those that are outraged with his commentary may take things more seriously than I do.
So let's decide Paul's fate. Does he stay or does he go? I have been informed by the ISU that these poll results will be binding and non-negotiable.
They think he's clueless, boring, talks too much, lacks precision, mispronounces everything, and repetitive. Jackie Wong, for example, seems to really be annoyed with his surface-level commentary.
I totally get it, but I find him harmless enough and I enjoy enough of his aloof Brit snark to find him a net positive. He just doesn't bother me much. I'd prefer him over Tracy/Rod, or Johnny/Tara most of the time.
I have a hunch that those that are outraged with his commentary may take things more seriously than I do.
So let's decide Paul's fate. Does he stay or does he go? I have been informed by the ISU that these poll results will be binding and non-negotiable.