1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Who is at fault? (dog fight)

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by BigB08822, Jul 12, 2010.

  1. leesaleesa

    leesaleesa Active Member

    Doesn't matter. It was an accident, but you still are liable for a dog breaking free of it's leash. As an owner, you are responsible at all times for controlling your dog. Just because you tried to control the dog and failed doesn't excuse you of liability. I see too many people who cannot control their dogs, or do not have them properly leashed. This is an accident which should be prevented by proper training/leashing.

    Both parties are at fault, and both are irresponsible dog owners. The poodle owner doesn't have a leg to stand on as he/she allowed it to roam, and the boxer's owner had no control over an aggressive and powerful dog.

    This is the unfortunate truth. If everyone took their responsibilities as dog owners as seriously as you do, it would be much easier. You wouldn't be at fault if your leashed dog attacked a loose dog approaching it, but why should you be put in that position?
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2010
  2. cruisin

    cruisin Banned Member

    Another problem, which I found out when my dog was attacked: Never let a child walk a dog that out weighs them. Never let a child walk a dog they are unfamiliar with. Never let a child walk a dog alone. Never let a child walk a dog that is too big for them to hold onto safely. Dangerous for any other dog/animal/person around and dangerous for the child.