1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo--the movie

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by IceAlisa, Mar 24, 2010.

  1. clarie

    clarie Well-Known Member

    I don't like the photo. She looks too manufactured. I hope in the actual film, that Salander will look more like the book describes.
  2. DubbalinGirl

    DubbalinGirl New Member

    I also think the blood on her hands is ridiculous. Granted I"m only halfway through Plays with Fire, but she hasn't killed anyone yet that we've confirmed. Why do they make her out to be a villain?
  3. IceAlisa

    IceAlisa discriminating and persnickety ballet aficionado

    I don't like it either for the exact reasons clarie mentioned.
  4. Nan

    Nan Just me, retired

    Manufactured is a good word for it. The hair looks too freshly cut and styled and the face too soft. I understand the make-up is an attempt to create more angles and sharpness, but to me, it just looks like make-up.
  5. snoopy

    snoopy Team St. Petersburg

    My mental picture of Lisbeth is Katia Gordeeva gone punk. I thought the character was supposed to be incongruous – a doll like figure who could kick ass. The women in the above photo looks too tough to me.
  6. genevieve

    genevieve drinky typo pbp, closet hugger Staff Member

    To be fair, ther Swedish version of the film did the same thing - Rapace's Salander was far more clean and "produced" looking than I's pictured from the books.

    I do think the blood on the hands was silly.

    Oh :rofl: x infinity. I really need to scrub that image from my mind. :rofl:
  7. Nan

    Nan Just me, retired

    True, but Rapace did look more rumpled and a lot less polished to me than this photo.
  8. IceAlisa

    IceAlisa discriminating and persnickety ballet aficionado

    I think Rapace was spot on, exactly how I pictured Salander.
  9. BigB08822

    BigB08822 Well-Known Member

    It is just a photo shoot for a magazine cover. It isn't as if she is going to be running around in the entire movie with blood on her hands and her hair in this exact same style. The blood on her hands is most surely metaphoric, no?
  10. Allen

    Allen Glad to be back!

    I agree. Rooney Mara looks good, but I just can't see her owning the role like Rapace. I just keep telling myself that it's a David Fincher movie and I will love it.
  11. BigB08822

    BigB08822 Well-Known Member

    I just watched The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest and really liked it. I didn't notice I was lost and I didn't read the books. However, maybe it is a matter of not knowing that I don't know certain things, ignorance is bliss. Anyway, I liked this movie more than the 2nd one which I actually found much more difficult to follow. I need to get the books.
  12. DubbalinGirl

    DubbalinGirl New Member

    I haven't read the third book yet, but I found the second book hard to follow. I have the movie coming today from Netflix, so we'll see.
  13. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    Any comments on the new GWTDT? I really liked Rooney's acting. She did a great job. Even though she isn't as "beautiful" as Noomi I found her quite beautiful in her own way.
  14. BigB08822

    BigB08822 Well-Known Member

    I am also curious to hear what people think. Almost everyone I know who has seen the film has not seen the original. I don't know if that is because people who saw the originals didn't go to see the new one or if they just didn't care enough to talk about it afterwards. I saw the original so I doubt I will pay $10 to see the remake, will wait for Redbox.
  15. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    I feel like I am the only one here to have seen this movie LOL I want to see the original just haven't had access to it yet!
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2011
  16. Holley Calmes

    Holley Calmes Well-Known Member

    I loved Noomi so much in the Swedish version...she had so much depth. I have seen photos of our USA version, and I have to admit that this Lisbeth looks younger and not as...interesting...but that is not fair. I will see the movie, but I have to admit loving the originals so much-I hope they haven't "Hollywooded" the story too much. Bless the child that plays Lisbeth in this version. She's going to be under a microscope.
  17. IceAlisa

    IceAlisa discriminating and persnickety ballet aficionado

    I want to see the new one too but it's not in the cards for quite some time. Will be good to hear what you guys think--is it worth it?
  18. pat c

    pat c Well-Known Member

    I agree. I think the Hollywood movie will do well as a lot of people don't like sub-titles, but having seen the Swedish version, I think it'll be a tougher sell to convince me that the Hollywood version is as good or better. (shrug)
  19. NeilJLeonard

    NeilJLeonard Well-Known Member

    The Swedish version I watched yesterday did not have sub-titles, it was dubbed with spoken English. I started "The Girl Who Played With Fire" yesterday. It had sub-titles. There is a world of difference watching the two.

    Hopefully, I'll get to see the American "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo over the Holidays. I'll write a comparison as soon as I do. After seeing Noomi Rapace's Lisbeth Salander I think that Rooney Mara has a tough, tough act to follow.

    We'll see soon enough.

    Last edited: Dec 22, 2011
  20. pat c

    pat c Well-Known Member

    Now that is too bad. I've seen all 3 and they all had sub-titles. The last one is particularly effective with sub-titles rather than too much dialogue, and Rapace is very good as Salander. As a side, she's in the new Sherlock Holmes movie with Downey, anyone seen that?
  21. BigB08822

    BigB08822 Well-Known Member

    I watched all 3 with subtitles. I knew to not watch them with dubbing as it would completely ruin everything. I think it is always better to find a version with subtitles if at all possible. I don't mind reading and watching but I know some people hate it.
  22. Theatregirl1122

    Theatregirl1122 Enjoying Vicarious Voids!

    I saw the Hollywood movie tonight. I haven't seen the originals but I saw it with a friend who had seen them. I read the books and she hasn't. I felt that, overall, the movie did a good job of portraying the story of the book. There were certainly details left out or changed but that was probably necessary.

    So I give the movie good grades for accuracy, but poor grades for pace. The pace was VERY fast. Too fast, for me. I ended the movie feeling like I had whiplash. My friend felt that the original is similar in that respect. She thought that the movies were quite similar although the portrayals of Lisbeth were different. The styling of Lisbeth in this movie was really taken to the nth degree but I didn't think that was necessarily bad. I thought Mara did an excellent job with the character. She also felt that there were some scenes in this movie that made a lot more sense than the original, specifically the ending when Lisbeth is in disguise. She also felt that the rape scene wasn't glossed over for American audiences and was just as disturbing as the original.

    Overall, we liked it from both the perspective of someone who'd read the book and someone who'd seen the previous movie but the pacing was a pretty serious issue.
    IceAlisa and (deleted member) like this.
  23. IceAlisa

    IceAlisa discriminating and persnickety ballet aficionado

    Saw the US version the other day. IMO it was very American--big budget, polished and relatively high paced. But I don't necessarily think it was a bad thing. I was prepared to be critical of Mara, having admired Noomi Rapace's performance but Mara held her own.

    She was a more vulnerable Lisbeth, the way the American remake of La Femme Nikita had a more vulnerable heroine.

    I have to say it was well-done and did the book justice. One (small) thing I don't understand is why Daniel Craig wore coats a couple of sizes too small. It wasn't flattering or showed off his physique, just looked ill-fitting. :huh:

    Overall, I was pleasantly surprised--a good movie.
  24. MacMadame

    MacMadame Cat Lady-in-Training

    I watched the Swedish version on Christmas day. I loved it. Hopefully I'll see the US version in theaters and not end up waiting until it comes out on DVD.
  25. HisWeirness

    HisWeirness pork cutlet bowl fatale

    I saw the US version last night. My husband and I have listened to all three books on audio book (I technically haven't read them ;)) and seen all three Swedish movies.

    We both felt that the US version was very well done and did a better job of developing the characters and their motivations than the Swedish version of TGWTDT did. The overall visual appearance and mood of the US movie really matched my mental picture of the book (perhaps because I am American). I felt that the screenwriter/director did a good job of distilling the book's story to the film format. I felt that the Swedish movie had a faster pace than the US movie. If I was not familiar with the books, I feel that I would have had a harder time following the plot of the Swedish version than the US version.

    We both disliked the opening (credits) sequence of the movie. I get what they were trying to do, but it came off as too heavy and artsy :drama:. I was pleased when it finally ended. :shuffle: Maybe the sound was just too loud in the theater...

    I'm looking forward to the next two movies. :)
  26. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Yuzuru, Medvedeva, T&M, Shibs, P&C

    I have only seen the US version (saw it last weekend) and liked it a lot. I have not seen the Swedish movies and have not read the books. I plan to read the books now, but that may spoil the sequels for me. I thought both main characters acted very well, especially Rooney Mara. I had seen her in The Social Network. Based on that I would not have imagined her in this role but she did a fabulous job. The cinematography was excellent and I liked the fast pace and the suspense. I am also happy that they went with a relatively unknown actress.

    Now I can't wait to see the next two movies. I am going to hold off on the Swedish ones, to avoid comparisons in the middle of it.
  27. peibeck

    peibeck Simply looking

    I saw the movie yesterday. I loved Rooney Mara, but I actually felt the film was a bit plodding in places. Until the two main characters begin working with each other (at about the mid point in the movie), I felt the pace was a little languid. I also had a problem with how Daniel Craig played his part (or was directed to play his part), he seemed like the least tenacious reporter I've ever seen.

    For those who have read the books, I assume
    Lisbeth's actions with the stolen funds
    in the third act are what trigger the sequel(s)?
  28. Kasey

    Kasey Correcting President Trump's grammar on Twitter :)

    Not completely ;)
  29. Yehudi

    Yehudi Snarks about Volchkova with love

    The sequel stems partly from
    where she explains why she needs to be a ward of the state and what she did to that sick pervert who was managing her affairs.
    The swedish version did a better job of setting up the sequel
    They intercut scenes of a young Salander setting her father on fire with the scene where Martin catches on fire
  30. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    the stolen funds did help her though ;)