1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

"Sultry Blonde" Anne of Green Gables Book Cover Causes Controversy

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by overedge, Feb 7, 2013.

  1. my little pony

    my little pony war crawling into canada

    33,549
    15,217
    i dont remember her owning a plaid work shirt

    that looks like a still from season 1 of dawson's creek
     
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  2. cygnus

    cygnus Well-Known Member

    2,628
    1,454
    It would appear that nobody involved in this decision had actually read the books!
     
  3. Alixana

    Alixana Definitely NOT a sonogram

    1,424
    461
    It's just wrong. :yikes:
     
    skateboy and (deleted member) like this.
  4. iggie

    iggie Well-Known Member

    1,480
    158
    "it's blonde, ain't it?"

    the girl let the braid drop back with a sigh that seemed to come from her very toes and to exhale forth all the sorrows of the ages.

    "yes, it's blonde," she said resignedly. "now you see why i can't be perfectly happy. nobody could who had blonde, hair."
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2013
  5. Habs

    Habs Well-Known Member

    4,495
    3,200
    This is so wrong.
     
  6. Prancer

    Prancer Cursed for all time Staff Member

    44,429
    18,761
    Well, she should have red hair, but I must say that when I read that she was "sultry," I was expecting something more along the lines of a plunging neckline, visible cleavage and a through-the-eyelashes come hither look. It sure wasn't something that would have looked right at home on a book in the 50s.
     
  7. Kruss

    Kruss Not Auto-Tuned

    2,906
    1,467
    As I saw on Twitter, Gilbert called her 'carrots', not 'turnips'.
     
    Alixana and (deleted member) like this.
  8. Spareoom

    Spareoom Well-Known Member

    2,379
    979
    lol, that is hilarious. Whoever put that cover on there obviously knows NOTHING about the books, otherwise they would have known that they could have put ANYONE on the cover and it would have been fine AS LONG as she had red hair. I mean, "Anne of Green Gables" is practically synonymous with red hair, haha!
     
  9. Nomad

    Nomad Celebrity cheese-monger

    11,575
    10,576
    Pulp novels excepted. I love the lurid covers of the 40s and 50s drugstore novels.
     
  10. Wyliefan

    Wyliefan Well-Known Member

    20,829
    8,550
    Saw that the other day -- isn't it awful? Of course, the irony is that now this little self-published version is getting all kinds of attention that it wouldn't have gotten otherwise. I doubt it'll translate into sales, though, so their marketing strategy may have backfired on them.
     
  11. skatingfan5

    skatingfan5 Past Prancer's Corridor

    12,620
    4,648
  12. Artemis@BC

    Artemis@BC Well-Known Member

    6,886
    3,495
    A friend posted this on her Facebook page last week. My immediate response was "oh, it's Anne of Heartland." :lol:

    Honestly, as wrong as this picture is (wrong era, demeanour, and obviously wrong haircolour) ... what disturbs me more is the fact that anyone can use "CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform" to just take Montgomery's text, slap a Photostock image on it, and sell it as theirs. I know that's how it works when a publishing copyright expires ... but it's still wrong in my book.
     
  13. DarrellH

    DarrellH New Member

    4,763
    381
    Sultry?
     
  14. backspin

    backspin Active Member

    999
    125
    I'm a little surprised her estate didn't get the copyright extended, sometimes I believe they can do that.
     
  15. danceronice

    danceronice Corgi Wrangler

    6,947
    971
    I would actually be very surprised if Sullivan Productions can't go after them.

    And can someone who can rep please rep Kruss for the 'turnips' comment? :lol:
     
  16. Artemis@BC

    Artemis@BC Well-Known Member

    6,886
    3,495
    Sullivan owns the rights to their own televised productions, not to the original text. There was a publisher on CBC radio the other day who said that the novels are public domain, although the copyright for some of Montgomery's short stories is still in effect.

    Found the interview online: interview (probably geoblocked)
     
  17. Artemis@BC

    Artemis@BC Well-Known Member

    6,886
    3,495
    :respec:

    :rofl:
     
  18. Finnice

    Finnice Well-Known Member

    6,735
    6,023
    This cover has nothing, nothing to do with Anne of the Green Gables. It is one of the worst examples of misleading book covers ever. :angryfire:yikes::angryfire

    (Yes, I am a huge L.M. Montgomery fan who has even travelled to Prince Edward Island because of her books.)
     
  19. overedge

    overedge Janny uber

    22,420
    11,600
    Even though the book is in the public domain, I wouldn't be surprised if the Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority (yes, it really exists) goes after them too.
    http://www.gov.pe.ca/anne/license.php3
     
  20. Alixana

    Alixana Definitely NOT a sonogram

    1,424
    461
    Done!
     
  21. Kruss

    Kruss Not Auto-Tuned

    2,906
    1,467
    Thanks, all! I wish I could take credit for that, but I saw it on Twitter. The funny thing is, I had no idea what they were talking about at the time, but of course saw it later in this thread.
     
  22. overedge

    overedge Janny uber

    22,420
    11,600
  23. skateboy

    skateboy Well-Known Member

    5,493
    3,370
  24. March_Hare

    March_Hare Member

    192
    20
    :yikes: Unbelieveable. Did anyone else have to double-check the calendar to make sure it was not April 1st?