1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hi all! No longer will threads be closed after 1000 (ish) messages. We may close if one gets so long to cause an issue and if you would like a thread closed to start a new one after a 1000 posts then just use the "Report Post" function. Enjoy!

Rank the World Championship-winning ladies FPs from 2000-2009

Discussion in 'The Trash Can' started by shady82, Mar 1, 2010.

  1. judgejudy27

    judgejudy27 Well-Known Member

    Competitively speaking it is true Kim from Vancouver would destroy any other World or Olympic winning performance this decade, especialy under COP. I am not sure if that all people are judging on though.
  2. FSfanatic

    FSfanatic New Member

    Nor did Asada win the LP this year en route to her 2nd title.

    Including Asada's 2010 win, I'd have it:

    1-Kwan 2001
    2-Asada 2010
    3-Arakawa 2004
    3-Kwan 2000
    4-Slutskaya 2005
    5-Kwan 2003
    6-Kim 2009
    7-Asada 2008
    8-Ando 2007
    9-Messnier 2006
    10-Slutskaya 2002
  3. stillalive

    stillalive Active Member

    But I recall that she had had a problem with her skates just before taking the ice for the long program, so it wasn't really a question of technique quality.
  4. falling_dance

    falling_dance Coaching Patrick

    I think that happened before the qualifying round skate.
  5. stillalive

    stillalive Active Member

    ops my bad then ;)
  6. olympic

    olympic Well-Known Member

    Johnny Come Lately [me]. I found this hard to rank because my top 4 are verrryyy close to one another. I did add the Olympic performances and '10 Worlds

    - Kim '10 [Vancouver] - just perfect. Basics make up for lack of a 3loop
    1. Arakawa '04 - beauty, power and fluidity (even if she ur'd the 3t of the opening 3-3-2, that was a pioneering move!)
    - Asada '10 [Torino] - 2 3x's and otherwise great execution, but to music not quite suited to her. She did finally make it work.
    2. Kwan '01 - Kwan clean and at her best IMO, but slightly less ambitious than Arakawa.
    3. Slutskaya '05 - most powerful of them all, but 3peated the 3loop, didn't she? Also, choreography was a little less than Kwan or Arakawa [feeding the chickens].
    4. Kwan '00 - nice and strong but a little emptier than other programs by Kwan.
    5. Asada '08 - didn't achieve take-off on the opening 3x but otherwise great.
    6. Kim '09 - lack of edge jumps puts her lower IMO than where she could've been on my list, even if her basics otherwise were phenomenal.
    7. Ando '07 - OK. She deserves credit for the great jumps but I found the choreography a little clunky and forced to overused music, her sit spin was not that great, and her spiral was too strained.
    - Arakawa '06 [Torino] - nice, but a little too safe.
    8. Kwan '03 - I'm in the minority, but this LP never did much for me. She was obviously beginning to dial it back at this stage in the career.
    9. Meissner '06 - Good for her and the execution of some major triples, but the technique and the non-jump elements were just a little subpar.
    - Hughes '02 [SLC] - In retrospect, not that great even if inspired.
    10. Slutskaya '02 - I thought this performance was just safe and otherwise unmemorable, dialed back from other attempts.
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2010
  7. judgejudy27

    judgejudy27 Well-Known Member

    Honestly I dont think hardly anyone would rank Kwan's 2003 Worlds title performance high on this list if Worlds werent in the U.S and the emotion created by the crowd and the moment made it seem like something far more extraordinary then it was. I am baffled how ANYONE thinks it is even close to her 2000 and 2001 World winning LPs, let alone better. Kwan's 2000 and 2001 winning LPs both had 7 triples, some huge jumps, a triple-triple, all out attack and speed, and so far better and more complex choreography than her 2003 program. Her 2003 program had far less jumps wise, far less choreography wise, less difficult non jump elements, less speed and convicition, and was somehow the best of the 3? She was clearly injured by that point and had to scale back her jumps, non jump elements, and choreography the remainder of her career. I just dont get it. And in 2000 and 2001 she actually had a real task ahead of her to win the title, she had Slutskaya favored over her in 2001, and Butyrskaya and Slutskaya to both pass in 2000, and she had to skate lights out to even have a shot of winning and helped to inspire such phenomenal skates those nights. The 2003 situation was nothing like that, she basically had to stay upright to ensure winning, it was basically a home country Kwan lovefest, and with Slutskaya having a bad year and out of Worlds and Cohen dropping back out of gold contention from even the Q round there was no real threat to her.

    Dont get me wrong, her 2003 World winning LP was still great and she fully deserved to win that year, but I actually think it is one of the weaker ones of this list, and doesnt even come close to her own 2000 and 2001 winning LP's, Slutskaya's 2005 or Arakawa's 2004 winning LPs, Kim's 2009 and Asada's 2010 winning or gold winning LP's at Worlds and Olympics.
  8. smarts1

    smarts1 Well-Known Member

    ... No offense to anybody (or Kwan), but I never understood the Kwan hype. She had some great short programs that I really liked (Rachmaninoff, East of Eden), but to me, most of her long programs were just okay and sometimes bleh (since her programs got worse post 2002). To me, it always looked like she was skating back and forth across the rink, and there was nothing that really stood out in her skating like a Midori Ito or a Natalie Krieg...

    But that's just my opinion...
    sbmeagain and (deleted member) like this.
  9. Marco

    Marco Well-Known Member

    Kwan's 2000 lp was a technical display. Good speed, strong jumps, slowish spins but great footwork. By Worlds the program was basically stripped of any major transitions (used to have steps before 3sal, 3flip and final 3lutz) but still had some great choreography and expression.

    Kwan's 2001 lp was the most beautiful and complex but again some triples were flawed. She still had good speed but was probably the slowest out of 2000, 2001 and 2003, some strong jumps, complex and beautiful spins, but had the simplest footwork in all of Kwan's programs.

    Kwan's 2003 lp was the simplest technically but all triples were perfect. She carried the most flow across the program and didn't rest at all. Spins were simple but fast. The program was as simple as TRV in Nice but she made use of the music and choreography really well. She possibly had the most sincere expression in this skate since 1998.
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  10. judgejudy27

    judgejudy27 Well-Known Member

    I dont think Kwan's 2003 Worlds winning LP would have even won the 2000 or 2001 Worlds. With her 2003 Worlds winning LP in 2000 she would have been placed 2nd to Slutskaya in the LP which would have placed her 3rd overall behind Slutskaya and Butyrskaya (the short program winner), whereas in 2001 she would have won the silver behind Slutskaya. Granted I know this isnt just about how they stack up competitively (atleast I dont think it is) but Kwan's 2003 World winning performance wouldnt have even been enough to win in years like 2000 and 2001.
  11. IceJunkie

    IceJunkie Well-Known Member

    Kwan's post-2001 LPs were underwhelming. Not a whole lot on choreography, but this has been rehashed so many times its unbelievable. She was injured, she wasn't able to move as well, etc, etc. We all know this. I was never a huge Aranjuez fan. But she did lay it down and skated brilliantly at 2003 Worlds. Along with Tosca at the 04' Nats, it wasn't the program so much as the passion and energy she had during her SLF and the fact she landed her jumps that made it so great. Boring choreo though.

    I love Kwan, but I give credit where credit is due. Kim's LP in Vancouver was hands down, the best LP ever given by a woman at the Olympics or Worlds this decade.
  12. Marco

    Marco Well-Known Member

    I prefer Kwan's 2000 Worlds lp the most from a competitive standpoint but enjoyed her 2001 and 2003 Worlds lp much more.

    I think with her 2003 Worlds lp she could probably beat Slutskaya's lackluster Carmen in 2000 Worlds but might not be able to beat Slutskaya's sloppy DQ at 2001 Worlds simply because it looked like Slutskaya's program was too much more difficult. The slight cheat on her 3toe3toe was overlooked because it was 6.0 and because Slutskaya/s 3/3s were even more cheated.
  13. judgejudy27

    judgejudy27 Well-Known Member

    At the 2000 Worlds even with the program she actually skated the judges gave Irina higher technical marks and she won only on a split decision, and won most of the judges she got on tiebreaks. So no I dont think with 6 triples and no triple-triple the same panel would have placed her over Irina. Of course Worlds were in Europe and most of the panel that year were from Europe.
  14. lexeoe

    lexeoe Active Member

    add to the fact that she went first in the skate order hence the lower mark. she probably would've gotten 5.8's for technical merit had she skated let's say 3rd or 4th.
  15. giselle23

    giselle23 Well-Known Member

    And reasonable minds can differ! I put Kwan's 2001 World's LP and maybe her 2000 World's LP above Kim's Olympic program, not factoring in for the pressure of the Olympics. Michelle did 7 triples and all of the different types of triples. Her command of the ice in 2001 is as good as it gets. But I really don't think you can fairly compare Olympics performances with Worlds or other performances, because the Olympics adds its own set of pressures. Most Olympic gold-winning performances, by the ladies at least, have not been perfect. Yu Na's program was and certainly among Olympic performances it ranks at or near the top.
  16. ponta1

    ponta1 Active Member

    Well, I know I'll get bashed for this, but it's only my personal preference so i don't really care. I enjoyed Shizuka's 2006 Olympics performance the best. I realize it was lacking technically, but there was just this something else to it that kept me mesmerized, and would never tire of watching that performance over and over and over and over.......:p
  17. iarispiralllyof

    iarispiralllyof Active Member

    since we're on the topic of personal opinions, yu-na does almost nothing for me artistically. she is technically excellent and her jumps are flawless and seem to have more ease going into them than most ladies, but that's it.

    also most of her programs are filled with choreography, but imo most of the choreography isn't effective but rather forced. she also puts effort into expressiveness.

    I like gershwin but I didn't like her music choice for her lp nor the choreography. thus as technically excellent as her elements were (mostly her jumps) I just can't get moved or inspired by the performance beyond the technical level.

    james bond was sassy/sexy but hardly the most inspiring short program of all time or anywhere near it. her choreography there was extremely overrated, as others have stated before me, that little gun move is hardly the epitome of brilliant choreography (she's not the first to use a gun move in a ladies fs bond program either...)

    for me personally, yu-na seems to have long arms which some might call lyrical but to me they look gangly

    I watched that performance when it first came on youtube to death. I thought it was brilliant. it wasn't until afterwards when I read the technical analysis of it as well as compared it to her technically groundbreaking 2004 worlds performance that I realized it was nowhere near her best and quite restrained.

    but I still think it's stunning. a lot of ppl say that regardless of sasha falling that night on romeo and juliet, sasha's artistry was much better than shizuka. I couldn't disagree more. shizuka may have a steely/stoic persona but she has these gorgeous long limbs and flow and the music was just spectacular. her icy face didn't affect her expressive footwork and gorgeous ina bauer. on the other hand everytime they did a closeup of sasha she put on that godawful fake romantic doe eyes expression. everytime she did that in her performances I rolled my eyes. sooo fake

    I think most people were reacting to the music sasha used more than her artistic performance (beyond her spirals which are top notch), how was she embodying juliet? most of her choreography was just the typical fru fru pretty twirly arms variety.
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2010
  18. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    I watched Shizuka's olympics performance and what was the ice coverage on that free skate Ina Bauer? That was amazing!!!
  19. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    I wish more skaters who could do an Ina Bauer well would do one for more than a second or two.
  20. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    I think after a whole season of mostly seeing short Ina bauers seeing that caused wow reaction!.
  21. briancoogaert

    briancoogaert Well-Known Member

    About Kwan and her 3 titles.
    My favorite is Song of the black Swan in 2001. It is the most complete program of the three.

    The red violin in 2000 was very touching, strong, with an amazing glide. But it was too front-loaded for my taste. No transitions and only jumps in the first 2 minutes !

    Her 2003 LP was just perfect. Simple but perfect. Jumps were perfect (except the 3Toe/2Toe), spins were perfect, footwork were perfect. And the crowd : wow, so emotional !
  22. piano18

    piano18 New Member

    Kwannie. Even if her 2009 performance in Korea was a shadow of her former self and wasn't a really good one!
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2010
  23. museksk8r

    museksk8r Holding an edge and looking dangerously sexy

    1. Michelle 2001

    2. Michelle 2000

    3. Michelle 2003

    4. Shizuka 2004

    5. Irina 2005

    6. Yu-Na 2009

    7. Irina 2002

    8. Mao 2008

    9. Miki 2007

    10. Kimmie 2006
  24. Spinner

    Spinner Where's my book?

    Are you serious? For someone 29 years old and out of the competitive scene for years, this friggin' RAWKED! GO KWEEN! :respec:
  25. iarispiralllyof

    iarispiralllyof Active Member

    she gained a little bit of weight which made her seem slower/more sluggish. other than that I thought she looked just like she used to...so I don't see what you mean by shadow of herself personally
  26. VIETgrlTerifa

    VIETgrlTerifa Well-Known Member

    What does her performance in Korea in 2009 have to do with ranking the World Championship winning LPs of the past decade?

    Just another reason to put in an insult I guess.
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  27. Screenie

    Screenie Active Member

    Someone else probably already said this but it was a 3sal/3toe as the 2nd combo, not a 3flip/3toe
  28. piano18

    piano18 New Member

    She was slower than usual and not at all fit for her grande Olympic comeback. But back to topic, VIETgrlTerifa, on her best World FS performances of 2000s: I love her 2003 and 2001 performances most, and that has to be in the top 6. Yuna (Scherezade) and Kwannie (2003, 2001) FPs are ones I watch more than the other ladies. Mao had a fall in that 2008 FS so not on the top 10 list for me.

    But my favorite performance from her is East of Eden from World Pros, 1998: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vN3DmQwCbc

    I can rewind just to watch those spread eagles!
  29. vassily

    vassily New Member

    Arakawa deserves the top spot, IMO. Kwan's 2 of 3 world titles takes the next 2 spots.
  30. UGG

    UGG Well-Known Member

    When was her Olympic comeback? Did I miss it? :p