manhn
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,797
I saw Moonlight last night. I quite liked the first act, the second act was kinda snoozy, loved the third act. Uneven, to say the least. Well, it's better than Manchester By the Sea. But it ain't no Jackie.
I saw Moonlight last night. I quite liked the first act, the second act was kinda snoozy, loved the third act. Uneven, to say the least. Well, it's better than Manchester By the Sea. But it ain't no Jackie.
What...nobody's watching movies this week? Or is everybody catching up on the Worlds coverage they have recorded? I've got about ten hours to watch still, but I'm going to space it out over the next few months in the off-season. Although last season I finished up watching various Grand Prix event coverage just a few weeks before this season started.
Apparently not, since Boss Baby was #1 at the box office. The idiocracy is real
I will fully admit that part of this post is based off of supposition and assumptions because I haven't seen The Great Wall or Ghost in the Shell and I'm not currently planning to. This is based off of things I've read around the internet and the box office performance.The baby really kicked Scarlett Johansson's butt. I thought Ghost In The Shell would do much better, but it debuted at #3 below Beauty and the Beast, making only just under 19 million. Boss Baby made just over 50 million. They both played in the 3500 to 3700 theatre range, but Boss Baby made over $13,000 per theatre while Ghost In The Shell made only just over $5,000 per theatre. The budget for Ghost In The Shell is 110 million....hope it makes a lot of money internationally. Johansson seems to be the leading female action hero these days, I want her to succeed so the doors open for other women to get the same chances she's been having recently.
Apparently not, since Boss Baby was #1 at the box office. The idiocracy is real
I will fully admit that part of this post is based off of supposition and assumptions because I haven't seen The Great Wall or Ghost in the Shell and I'm not currently planning to. This is based off of things I've read around the internet and the box office performance.
I do wonder if the reason for the poor performance of both movies is because of the whitewashing, or supposed whitewashing from what I've read about The Great Wall, of the casts. There was a lot of anger about the casting of Scarlett Johansson as the main character as opposed to a Japanese actress. In the case of The Great Wall, it was accused of bringing in Matt Damon strictly to have a white person in the movie as opposed to his character being necessary to the plot as a white person and having Matt Damon's character embody the "White Savior" trope. Both things, which I have read later from people who saw the movie, weren't actually true. But apparently the trailer didn't indicate that very well and the movie didn't really seem to be marketed very well in North America.
As for Ghost in the Shell, I've read a lot more about that than I did The Great Wall. I seem to be adjacent to a lot of anime fans even though I've never been that into it myself. People were/are pretty unhappy about the amount of white washing in GitS. From some articles that I've come across over the weekend, the way the whole movie presents race and the perception of race is apparently very problematic. I'm not sure if people have the same patience for whitewashing like that in movies anymore. I still wonder why they couldn't cast someone like Rinko Kikuchi or even Rila Fukushima (from The Wolverine) as the Major. Rinko Kikuchi has a degree of recognition in North America, maybe not a lot, but some. Rila Fukushima is apparently in GitS but it seems to be a pretty minor part because she's under the "See full cast" cut on IMDb.
I know that the success of Dr. Strange despite accusations of whitewashing would make something that discredits my theory. I chose not to mention it because it's a Marvel movie and those seem to exist on a totally different scale. I am intrigued to see what happens with the live action Death Note movie in August. It also consists of a main cast made up primarily of white people.
Discussion topic for the board: As white actors/actresses know there are a lack of acting roles for people of colour, is a white person's taking a role that was definitely originated for a person of colour...an act of racism? (Even if a subtle act of racism?)
I wonder if the actor/actress is the least responsible. Before them the screenwriters and before them the producers and before them the original author...who could demand that their character's race remains as written, right? Otherwise they wouldn't sell over the rights to their work?
Yes.Discussion topic for the board: As white actors/actresses know there are a lack of acting roles for people of colour, is a white person's taking a role that was definitely originated for a person of colour...an act of racism? (Even if a subtle act of racism?)
Alan Moore hates adaptations of his work, period. I don't think I've ever read anything nice from him on any of them. Considering how the movie V for Vendetta changes the reasons for V's actions I can understand that. I still love the movie though.Stephen King disliked Kubrick's adaptation of The Shining. Alan Moore straight up hates the adaptation of V for Vendetta...
Finally watched The Hunt (Danish) on DVD. Very good. Once again, Mads Mikkelsen gives a masterful performance. All other actors are good too, particularly little Annika (SP?) who played Klara. Why doesn't an actor like Mikkelsen get an Oscar nomination? IIRC Roberto Benini is the only male actor to get an Oscar nomination for a foreign language film. There must be others, but I can't think of one right now. One thing is for sure. Danish movies are very good. Next on my list is Land of Mine, but I can't find it on Netflix.
Just saw it myself yesterday with the kids. First off, the cartoon version is my favorite Disney so my expectations were high. They did a good job especially on the group numbers. The opening and the tavern scenes were extremely well done and enjoyable. Like you I prefered the first half where we see the village and the other characters. The way the interactions between Belle and the Beast were handled was the weak link in this movie. The beast was not menacing and scary enough to start with and he turned too quickly into a sad puppy eyes creature. Lefou and Gaston were the highlights, great job by both actors.I saw Beauty and the Beast today - afternoon matinee.
I really enjoyed it.
Work has been incredibly busy, auditors have been here, they left yesterday, and I took today off, as I had already worked more than my weekly hours by Thurs pm. It was a perfect movie for my mood - not taxing, just sit back and enjoy, easy to do, since I had seen the original animated version. I do not think I could of sat through anything taxing or draining.
I thought Luke Evans, Kevin Kline and Ewan McGregor and the general animated items/people were be the best part of the movie. I love Emma Watson, but she was nothing memorable in this movie, or it was the boringest part in the movie. Dan Stevens looks younger than when he was on Downton. The best parts were the ones I mentioned and Ian McKellan, Chip etc.
Since the New Year, after needing something to distract me from real life stress, I decided to revisit some of my favorite movies by watching them by director. I watched a few Ozu, Cassavettes, Fellini, Hou Hsiao-Hsien, among others, and I have to say that Jane Campion really is one of the best directors of all time. I recently re-watched Bright Star which an absolutely amazing romantic film, and I really enjoyed her adaptation of Portrait of a Lady which many who have revisited it say it's an interesting adaptation because it's also a critique of the Henry James novel (which I find extremely intriguing), and of course The Piano and her tv miniseries Top of the Lake.
I'm really looking forward to (but also hesitant due to the subject matter) Ingmar Bergman, who is next of my mental list. Autumn Sonata is one of my favorites and I haven't seen Persona or Cries and Whispers yet. Hitchcock is also on my list, and I am ashamed to say that I haven't seen much of his work other than catching them on TV when I was younger. I have seen Rebecca countless times, however. I know it's not the most demonstrative film of his talent and genius, but I really love Joan Fontaine and Laurence Olivier in that film. And of course Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers is classic.
Discussion topic for the board: As white actors/actresses know there are a lack of acting roles for people of colour, is a white person's taking a role that was definitely originated for a person of colour...an act of racism? (Even if a subtle act of racism?)
Actors have a responsibility to know whether they can take on a role in a competent manner. At least actors with some clout. I won't really blame any young or hungry actor to take on any role that comes to them. If they don't look the part, they should know it. IMO, someone like Scarlett Johansson should be held to a higher standard than, say, the actress whose biggest role to date is playing the dead body on a procedural.
Not necessarily. A white person might take the role because they are desperate for a paycheck.
The racism would be on the producer or director, or the casting director - whomever selected the white person to play the role.
I've never watched any movies by Hou Hsiao-Hsien, which ones would you advise to start ?
ITA on Jane Campion, you make me want to watch Bright Star again, thanks.
And sorry for double-posting
See it gets tricky when you get into lesser known actors and casting decisions. There is a definite hierarchy in Hollywood and sometimes an actor will do whatever they can to get a part, so they might be willing to say yes to a role that should be played by someone of another race because it gives helps them move up the ladder or because they need money and Hollywood is brutal. Which is why ultimately I still think the onus should be on the production companies, directors and casting directors (in that order). The more well known actors are definitely in a better position to be heard and are more likely to be able to say no to a part without it affecting their career as much.So if an actor is broke, it can't be considered a racist action? But if they have a healthy bank account, then maybe it could be considered to have a racist element to it? Is this like saying poor people can't be racist, but rich people can be?
As for the actor taking the role written for a person of colour, are we saying they can claim ignorance? "I never read the source material...I had no idea this was written for a black person!" or "my bosses, the producers and directors said it was okay...I simply did what they told me to".
So if an actor is broke, it can't be considered a racist action? But if they have a healthy bank account, then maybe it could be considered to have a racist element to it?
Is this like saying poor people can't be racist, but rich people can be?
As for the actor taking the role written for a person of colour, are we saying they can claim ignorance? "I never read the source material...I had no idea this was written for a black person!" or "my bosses, the producers and directors said it was okay...I simply did what they told me to".