US Pairs 2012-13 news & updates

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by Sylvia, May 4, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DORISPULASKI

    DORISPULASKI Watching submarine races

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Messages:
    9,915
    ITA re Sappenfield.

    But she surely knows how to teach triple twists and throw flips & lutzes.

    Why doesn't she work out some deal with a decent stylist or costume expert :wall:
     
    ioana and (deleted member) like this.
  2. olympic

    olympic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    7,086
    Yes, Interesting point. Styling / costuming from the Sappenfield camp is very 'pageanty' looking and probably gets a :huh: outside of NA.

    Does this mean S/K are doomed? :(
     
  3. haribobo

    haribobo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,571
    They're only doomed if they choose to be. AFAIK coaches can't prevent their skaters from seeking outside help or choreo, of course provided they can afford it. I think its pretty early to say that a team like this could be doomed from improving. But yes if they just stay with the traditional CO teams mode of blah programs from year to year, then they probably will be semi-doomed from ascending high up the world rankings. The only US team I've ever seen come out with a ton of awesome choreo and style in their first year was Scott/Fein. Although I can't really say there were a ton of other teams in the 90s or 00s with a truly amazing level of presentation. I'd say Kalesavich/Parchem, Magarian/Guzman, Spielberg/Joeright, Evora/Ladwig, Donlan/Speroff, and Castelli/Shnapir at each of their best have been some of my favorite teams of the last couple decades, and sadly most of these teams have been lacking on the tech side.
     
    emilieh and (deleted member) like this.
  4. DORISPULASKI

    DORISPULASKI Watching submarine races

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Messages:
    9,915
    C&S are improving this year. They have landed 3t and 3S in competitions. I'm not sure why they are leaving a 2A combo or sequence in the LP, because they always muff it. However, they need another throw other than the 3S they use. They vacillate between 2A (which is too low a BV) and 3A (which they haven't landed reliably). OTOH, the lifts, twists, and death spirals are fine.

    Their speed is currently very good. I have hopes for them still !
     
  5. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    20,568
    Kalesevich/Parchem had wonderful choreography from his wife-to-be, and they had style.
     
  6. olympic

    olympic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    7,086
    I think it's been stated in this thread (or another) that C/S choose to do the throw 3x (or 2x) because those throws are actually more reliable for C/S than a throw 3f or throw 3l (I had asked the same question).

    Maybe a SBS 3t and SBS 3s in their LP is coming soon. I honestly think with those SBS jumps and a different throw, they could take D/C. They've really made a ton of headway this season!


    My statement was just tongue in cheek because I'm becoming a fan of theirs ...
     
  7. shan

    shan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    17,247
    I wish she would. It seems that the coaches with teams that have great style/lines struggle so much technically. We need to take the strengths of each and build the perfect coach. :lol:
     
  8. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133
    This is assuming that coaches and anyone else for that matter buy costumes? I am sure coaches would love to have everything but it is a process. MY favorite programs have been very simple costumes WITHOUT stylists. I think teams do the best they can. Since families are paying for training etc etc...highering people to ie:"style you" is ridiculous. It is a performance sport so yes costume is important but please be real about it. As far as bringing the perfect coaches together that sounds a little like "Stetford Wives" and I have no desire to ever have that happen...ever...I think they all bring something special...in their discipline.
    I was at a Nationals once where people were complaining about a person wearing the same costume two years in a row. They said "we pay good money for these tickets so they should change their costumes?" That particular person was not only paying for skating themselves but instead of getting a new costume paid for his Aunts Chemo by working three jobs???. Get a grip...they are not celebrities earning millions for movies...or the Kardashians...so....let that one go and be real.

    As far as Sappenfield check the stats...she is the most successful pairs coach in the USA I started checking that out after France and NHK...it's amazing. Look at 08 and all the years she has coached...she is not perfect no one is...but man she is smart as a whip and obviously knows her discipline...I also love the Boston coaches and the Florida coaches..it is fun to see Menno and Sand coaching some up and comers...so...? um I think telling a brand new team barely together 6 months they are doomed cause they are with the most celebrated coach in the US is a little extreme...

    As far as changes I hope there is development not changes...S/K are awesome I love some of the other teams too I as a whole am very excited about where things are going..in US Pairs...and ya never know this new team and some others have brought HUGE surprises this year I DOUBT that will end in the future. from any of them. C/S well I have to say I thought they would never break through as they tend to blow it at Nats..but look things change Also Simon is tall and kind of clunky but this year he is a part of the choreography...so exciting!!
    I do love D'C too I have to say she is a spark of life that girl...and they seem happy on the ice. They don't owe me? I am just enjoying a very very difficult discipline taught by very talented coaches and enjoying their love of spirit and sport. Have you seen how high those twists are??? I would not be caught DEAD doing that...it is soooo hard!!!! Thanks goodness they are all brave enough to bring their talents and dedicate everything they own, have and do to this sport I so love watching pairs!! whoot whoot!!!
     
  9. jdonavan

    jdonavan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    197
    Actually... every lady that has a throw flip/lutz in Sappenfield's camp has learned and mastered it with other coaches. Any "home grown" (if any) teams she has do salchow and loop....
     
  10. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133

    I am sure with her and other coaches you do what the person or pair can do best from what I can tell but correct me if I am wrong.that is why C/S are doing throw Daxel??? in lew of another throw triple....The coach has almost nothing to do with that....some people are good at toe jumps/throws and some are good with edge throws.kinda depends on the person and usually someone with awesome turnout cannot do a flip or lutz very well..someone with more closed hips can do those better...that has been my experience although it is not vast..as far as other countries the coaching and training seems to be different more like you are doing this or else..where in America it is based more on what the skater "Likes" or "feels good about".

    ..as a coach that is not always in your control. Can't really say the same for the twist though...she for sure owns that...technique whatever it is...I've not seen any pair coach come close to that element the way she can obviously teach it....
    As far as different elements as skaters it seems to me there are favorites in elements...some love toe elements some edge elements...some love a more soft balletic approach some love to go fast and be killers on the ice..you can shape and mold but you cannot make it happen when it is not there...you work with and capitalize on what the assets are...that is always what John Nicks and Frank Carroll did...they did not teach a lot of basic skills learn to skate preliminaries...??? Good skaters came to them on the rise cause they were successful in their disciplines and those coaches worked with their assets and helped to create the dream... just thoughts...
     
  11. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133
    Also interested in what other think about this? IS it possible to teach what you want to teach regardless of the student body shape or ??? I know until recently the throw Triple flip and Lutz were really not required at all..then one year you had to do throw toeloop and I thought teams would die!! they all hated it..from what I could tell on their faces at Nats one year...it was scary....loop and salcow were the standard and as they are done more you will see them more but wondering if anyone else thinks it is more body shape and beginning training of the student at a non-elite level that shapes the student or can an elite skater come to an elite coach at the Senior or Junior level and be taught totally different elements and feel good about changes everything they know or are comfortable with? Just wondering...as a skater I was never great at lutz or flip and hated toes of any kind...loved edge jumps loop sal etc...could do them in my sleep but doing a flip was death to me. Wondering if anyone thinks it makes a different in pairs?
     
  12. shan

    shan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    17,247
    I don't think anyone should spend big bucks on a stylist, and I would never criticize a skater for rewearing costumes. I can only imagine how much they cost, but I don't think that not spending big bucks has to equate bad costuming. And I wasn't even referring to costuming when I said style. Good choreography and overall presentation are necessary. As successful as Sappenfield's pairs are, they all struggle to break into the top tier of pairs. I do think she knows elements and is good at getting her skaters to be consistent, but the music/choreography needs work.
     
  13. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133
    I agree with this except where it pertains to M/B they were exquisite so I think it always needs work..and is a work in progress and depends on the skater...no magic sometimes it is who the person/skater is that determines that... not with her teams with all teams..once in awhile you get a M/B and other teams that have a gift of all style/choreography etc...a natural gift there but they usually struggle with technique..so I think it is a work in progress and is what it is sometimes...
    Wow M/B were so amazing! Hope Rockne finds a suitable partner sometime.
     
  14. aftershocks

    aftershocks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,813
    ^^ I take it you are referring to McLaughlin/ Brubaker, and not Marley/ Brubaker, since Mary Beth and Rockne were not coached by Sappenfield? I really enjoyed both M/B teams ... unfortunate for Rockne and fans of him and his partners that the partnerships were short-lived. Wishing Rockne the perfect pairing soon and wonderful success.
     
  15. carriemarie

    carriemarie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    328

    I think Jdonavon's point is that the Delilah's teams don't try the lutz/flip throw unless they previously were able to do it with other partners (ie Denney w/Barrett). I think you can go with skaters strong points, but Delilah's teams aren't really raising the bar technically or artistically. She obviously gets her teams where they need to be domestically, but also is very generic, perhaps because she has so many skaters on her plate. I certainly cannot argue with her teams general consistency or results, but I think if America wants to be competitive on a global scale more technical difficulty and more emphasis on artristry/style needs to be addressed from the ground up all the way to D/C.
     
  16. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133

    I can see that but I don't think it applies to just certain teams but America in general. I think Technically we compete, in consistency we compete..yes artistry/choreography is important ..but when I see pang and tong wipe the ice on throws, death spirals jumps etc and have horrible lift positions and get 1st or second? well ?? That's just nuts!! Lets face it we are not the super power where pairs are concerned and never have been it wouldn't matter what we did on a world level.. I have seen judging still be an issue with giving America or even Canada its "just" scoring...someone said in the NHK or another GP forum I think? that the Russians or whomever could stay in the locker rooms and still win? The Germans who have horrible costumes and packaging this year (personal opinion) and some weird stuff going on in both programs could also stay in the locker room and still win...fair?( I do however appreciate them pushing the bar and doing sometimes crazy stuff) America being competitive happens now..D/C are doing great so are C/S really impressed with them as well as S/K I think D/S have a lot to offer too.love their style!..they all have positive and points to work on but not sure if they do they would ever beat Pang and Tong just due to politics..?? winning on a global scale without coming out of the locker room..??? not sure that is in the cards..It is just the life of pairs. Eventually USA made it happen in Dance but I am not sure pairs is ready for that. I hope it happens though...would be spectacular! and I still hold out hope that one day America will have that happen... along with fair judging in all disciplines at all world events and stages! as long as judging involves some personal likes and dislikes though or as long as it is judged by a persons feelings (PCS)and countries that will not allow Americans / Canadians to be on top without a severe fight... and it is not judged like a race where there is a clear winner and not a judging of a personal nature not sure it will but who knows...anything is possible.:D
     
  17. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,627
    You seem to forget S/S won a bronze last year at NHK, so no, the judges are not just giving golds away to undeserving teams. There are no American teams right now that can challenge the top teams in the world, P/T included. It has to do with who they are partnered with and how they are packaged. D/C having a great twist and throws are not enough to downplay their weaknesses. Until these pairs get better choreography, they will only win in a very weak field or they need to hope the top teams mess up that badly. The sooner Sappenfield realizes that the better her teams will be.
     
  18. carriemarie

    carriemarie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    328


    IA about Pang and Tong, but they have been around for, what, four Olympic quads now? That certainly helps their scores, although I don't think it's right and don't agree with it. I am not a fan of V/T and think they are way overmarked, but I do enjoy the Germans and their crazy style. The problem is America lacks a team with any sort of longevity. I am sure if D/C go for 2018 their marks will improve even if they don't, especially with their consistency and retirements of some of the top teams. I agree that there are teams in the US with potential, but there have always been teams with potential in the US and for whatever reason they don't reach it, break up, or retire before they can truly get to the top level of the sport. It has never been about the US not having the talent or depth in pairs. I blame it on the mindset of breaking up if you have one bad season, one coach cornering most of the market (as I think the Florida and Boston teams have much more interesting and innovative programs because they haven't taken on every student they can get), and the inability of the USFS to be able to politically back a team because of the constant changes in partners and different champions every year.
     
  19. carriemarie

    carriemarie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    328
    I am sorry, but D/C were much better than P/T at Skate America. I don't like the team or their asthetic, but in both their GP's they were severely undermarked for what they did compared to the other teams. They were fairly clean in events where there were multiple mistakes by the winners. I know that their PCS aren't as strong, but a clean skate is a clean skate and they deserved to be above the Chinese and B/L, respectively, in both of their GP's. I think they were better than V/T at both competitions on those days (although I don't think they are a better team), but as current world silver medalists I can better understand them being held up. I am not saying Sappenfield gives them the right package as far as styling, choreography, and music, but they consistently deliver strong elements and near clean programs with confidence and that should be appropriately rewarded.
     
  20. nylynnr

    nylynnr Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    420
    Spot on comments from Figureit and Carriemarie. The pairs' judging at Skate America was lacking. The Russians gained positive GOE's for sloppily executed elements, while Pang and Tong limped into town without triples, flailed around on other elements and still won silver.
     
  21. Pulaski73

    Pulaski73 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    56
    Re Sappenfield:

    I think the style and component aspect of her teams has honestly had everything to do with the actual skaters. D/C and S/K don't necessarily have the best skating skills and we can all tell. However if you look at some of her former teams such as Mclaughlin/Brubaker and Yankowskas/Coughlin, they had exceptional style, poise, and choreography. Give S/K some time together and I bet next season their programs will be far better than they clearly are this season. Unfortunately, D/C have yet to truly embrace their skillset as skaters in terms of natural movement, etc. Once they begin to find their syle, I'm sure they'll be much stronger internationally. They are trying!! (Hiring Camerlengo, etc...) But I don't know if Sappenfield is to be blamed for Denney's lack of grace. The skaters she molded (Mclaughlin, Yankowskas, even skaters like Paetsch, Carmen, and Simpson) all had/have STUNNING lift positions, skating skills, and general athleticism. She is clearly doing something right to have had the last 4/5 national champions.
     
  22. carriemarie

    carriemarie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    328
    As I have stated, her results are quite impressive, and I am not blaming her for all of Caydee's 'issues'. Her positions are horrible, but the girl gets the job done and you can't argue with that. What I can argue with is Sappenfield's lack of desire to up the ante technically and go outside the box in any fashion in choreography and music. Her results are excellent domestically, but to break the barrier at Worlds changes need to be made. Keauna and Caitlyn have/had a natural talent, poise, and connection with music. Sappenfield didn't teach them those skills. My problem is that she doesn't seem to know how to package her skaters that aren't as gifted in that area properly.
     
  23. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133
    . My problem is that she doesn't seem to know how to package her skaters that aren't as gifted in that area properly.[/QUOTE]


    I'm curious how would you in detail package her teams specifically? D/C, S/K, S/B, A/S, and anyone else that is her teams can't remember them all but I know there is a lot.....If you feel they are not "packaged" properly how would you do it? There are some challenges and certain things are NOT a coaches choice...money for costumes, money for choreographers, dance, extra lessons and sessions...additional coaching etc..but maybe that is not what you are talking about. I think she is brilliant with what she works with including families and skaters working in their realm of ability, financial capability and newness...although I am just assuming that when you put that many teams, pairs, individuals and families together you better be good at making sure you can figure that one out...must be hard!

    You continue to say the same thing without detail and I would love to hear what you would do specifically for these teams that are so lacking because you have a point I am not sure that saying it is not there without adding what specifically it is and how it can be improved is fair...and I am just nosy I guess..so if you care to share...
     
  24. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,627
    Based on what criteria? Certainly not the same as the judges are using.

    Fairly clean? What does that even mean? They just land the elements and nothing else? D/C did do well on their throw in the short, however it wasn't high nor did she get far when she was thrown. Unlike Pang and Volosohzar who were thrown both high AND far. They did have slight errors on the landing, but nothing that would give them -1.00 or more and would I rather see that as opposed to a girl who lands it but barely gets off the ground and a guy who almost comes to a complete stop.

    At least you admit their PCS scores aren't up to snuff because that is HALF the score. You can have the highest base value and TES but if you can't do the elements BETTER than the competition (i.e. the best in the world); skating clean isn't going to cut it until the element and PCS scores are made as good as the skaters can do them. But if you have a coach who ignores the weaknesses of the team, they will NEVER get better. You can blame the two time World Champions for being who are they but there is no mistaking they are fabulous (11 years in the top four at Worlds except for two years when they were 5th, 2003 and 2008) Same with V/T who are now in their third year together but who were also 4th in the world with previous partners; they are fabulous skaters. Look at what happened to them in the short program at Worlds last year, there were 8th! So judges aren't afraid to give scores the teams deserve even if they already have a World silver medal.

    I'm not sure if I should use :rolleyes: or :rofl:

    They are appropriately awarded. Judges aren't holding them down, their coach is.
     
  25. figureit

    figureit Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    133
    According to D/C bios Sappenfield did not choreograph their programs ? you are aware of this right? I think it says :
    Choreographer:
    Pasquale Camerlengo I don't know this person but I am assuming they are very good. Maybe someone else has information on them?


    Do you have a personal problem with this coach? cause it seems to me most of the pair teams work with either a choreographer or someone working on artistry like Patrick Chan's current coach works with them in the story Kathy someone? I read in US Figure Skating magazine...so most of this information is and seems bias against this coach for some personal reason? Most of the pair coaches by Junior or especially Senior level work with professional choreographers that are very experienced and talented...so confused there but it was interesting checking that out I learned some things.
     
  26. Proustable

    Proustable New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    Camerlengo is probably the most broadly admired choreographer in figure skating today, imo.
     
  27. Sylvia

    Sylvia On to GP & U.S. Sectionals!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    31,966
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2012
  28. carriemarie

    carriemarie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    328

    I'm curious how would you in detail package her teams specifically? D/C, S/K, S/B, A/S, and anyone else that is her teams can't remember them all but I know there is a lot.....If you feel they are not "packaged" properly how would you do it? There are some challenges and certain things are NOT a coaches choice...money for costumes, money for choreographers, dance, extra lessons and sessions...additional coaching etc..but maybe that is not what you are talking about. I think she is brilliant with what she works with including families and skaters working in their realm of ability, financial capability and newness...although I am just assuming that when you put that many teams, pairs, individuals and families together you better be good at making sure you can figure that one out...must be hard!

    You continue to say the same thing without detail and I would love to hear what you would do specifically for these teams that are so lacking because you have a point I am not sure that saying it is not there without adding what specifically it is and how it can be improved is fair...and I am just nosy I guess..so if you care to share...[/QUOTE]



    I would hesitate to say what I would do with all of her teams. I don't think that I am capable of giving a list of issues for all of them, but I do think there are a lot of teams that are hindered by the amount of teams she coaches. She is a good coach, obviously, and knows what she is doing, but she has room for improvement with the SBS, with the throws, getting the full points on the lifts, and getting better PCS scores.
     
  29. carriemarie

    carriemarie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    328
    Get a clue. They were undermarked. Just because a throw was 'higher' with more 'distance' it should get more points than a strong, cleanly landed throw? Seriously? I am just stating what is obvious. I am not sure if I should use an eyeroll or LMAO for YOU. You clearly have little idea as what goes on in pair skating if you think P\T outskated D/C. I guess you can spend your time figuring out what fairly clean means and I don't have the time or will to explain it to you..............
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2012
  30. Pulaski73

    Pulaski73 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    56
    I 100% agree with Carriemarie. D/C skated completely clean and were seriously undermarked. P/T and V/T should be getting higher PCS but their GOE on elements is outrageous. D/C Hit their elements and have excellent athleticism to do such and are not rewarded in grade of execution. I'm sorry, no matter how elegant they may be during the rest of their program, a botched throw should not be getting positive execution marks and a cleanly landed throw should be getting high ones. This can be the same for jumps, etc. But when an aborted lift (V/T at skate america) is getting positive GOE, you can't seriously believe the judging was good at Skam.

    And If you're going to say someone does a poor job at packaging someone, please give a specific example instead of just a "boo" without any support. It just doesn't make for an intellectual conversation. I think Sappenfield is just hit or miss with program ideas as is every choreographer. If you look at some of her previous progra,s (Again I use Keauna and Caitlin for examples) I thought M/B Romeo and Juliet was an excellent program as well as Y/C Ave Maria. M/B and Y/C Malaguena and Oblivion programs were exquisite on both ladies. Denney has A LOT of issues to work on artistically and Sappenfield is obviously trying (I think Aranjuez is a great program for her.) I also believe S/K Moonlight Sonata is entrancing as well, a little barren, but you can't throw in everything and the kitchen sink all at once. It would just be too much for them. I LOVE LOVE LOVE A/S programs this year and think she is essentially a Prima Ballerina on ice. Britney Simpson is a DIVA thanks to Dalilah as well and you could see people crying at nationals during their Titanic program. I think she's doing an A-Okay job with packaging thus far. We just don't love our national champions... that's the real problem IMO. They just really need a great vehicle for next year.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.