Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Main floor
    Posts
    2,428
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    An 'Ikea' House!

    This sounds interesting, and inventive. http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/no...bled-under-30K

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,391
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Neat idea for a single or a very minimalist couple

  3. #3
    Alissa Fan Forever
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Age
    51
    Posts
    3,581
    vCash
    565
    Rep Power
    6940
    I like it. But I'm the anti-pack rat.

    My only concern is if it could withstand a zombie apocalypse. I'd feel safer if it was capable of floating on water.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Wildrose country
    Posts
    1,333
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1342
    Very cool, thanks for posting the link!

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    17,726
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15381
    Thanks for posting that. I have been interested in the small house movement for quite a while now so it is good to see what innovations are out there.
    When you are up to your arse in alligators it is difficult to remember you were only meant to be draining the swamp.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In the Land of Unrealistic Assumptions
    Posts
    4,511
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1942
    I'd like the scale model to add to my dollhouse collection, although it doesn't say what scale the model is.
    "You just can't underestimate the power of positive underwear." 2013 Fruit of the Loom ad

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,201
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    think of how much better type of structure this would have been than the trailers that the refugees from Katrina received. Or Haiti victims who received ....not much. My concern would be how they withstand wind

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    3,045
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Overall, I like the concept.

    But for me, not so much...bad knees make loft beds with steep stairs or a ladder out of the question + I have too many books, tapes, records, CDs, etc., for such a tiny space.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Age
    70
    Posts
    2,971
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Funny that the focus is on reducing the size of the house to reduce housing costs. In most major cities, esp Vancouver, it is the cost of the land that drives the prices beyond the budget of most people.
    This house would be OK as an infill house, or tucked in the back of a large lot, if you could get a building permit.

    I agree that it is a really good idea, and could live in such a house, I just don't think it adresses the real issue of housing costs.

  10. #10
    Liberal Furry
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Packing for REAL London!
    Posts
    2,274
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2163
    I think that the stairs (if that's what they are) look kind of dangerous.

    Also, these tiny houses are obviously designed for people with no book collections.
    I know. But I do not approve. And I am not resigned.
    (Edna St Vincent Millay)

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    3,045
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cygnus View Post
    I think that the stairs (if that's what they are) look kind of dangerous.

    Also, these tiny houses are obviously designed for people with no book collections.
    I assume they expect people to either get rid of their books or to have all of them on a Kindle, etc. But for many of us, we love our books, and couldn't afford to repurchase our favorites on an electronic format...even if we wanted to do so.

  12. #12

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    5,251
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    5962
    Is the creator's goal to make housing more affordable, or to make it more eco-friendly, or to make people more minimalist, or what? It's unclear what he's trying to accomplish.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    621
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    The description says that the space is 10' x 10' space and that is about 10m^2?? That is really really tight. I used to live in a studio around 25 m^2 and I felt that was quite small... As someone who grew up a little outside the city center, where the houses often have a backyard, the idea of being crammed in a 10m^2 room for years and years to come is horrifying

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,797
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I would love it, but as a secondary home. Just one thing, I do not see any shower...
    Last edited by Choupette; 11-26-2013 at 11:48 PM.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Dashing Between Bennetton and Krispy Kreme
    Posts
    2,424
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by zaphyre14 View Post
    I'd like the scale model to add to my dollhouse collection, although it doesn't say what scale the model is.
    Full size and it's still a doll house!

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    23,837
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gazpacho View Post
    Is the creator's goal to make housing more affordable, or to make it more eco-friendly, or to make people more minimalist, or what? It's unclear what he's trying to accomplish.
    He said at the beginning it was to make housing more economically accessible for people. But as JasperBoy pointed out:
    Quote Originally Posted by JasperBoy View Post
    In most major cities, esp Vancouver, it is the cost of the land that drives the prices beyond the budget of most people...I just don't think it addresses the real issue of housing costs.
    Usually the driving price of homes is the cost of real estate in a particular location. When real estate is at a premium, people lower the cost by building up--high-rise buildings where a lot of people are sharing the cost of minimal real estate. But that's not something that could be done with these homes.

    In places where land is fairly cheap, the houses are as well. A friend of mine purchased her home in a rural part of Iowa for under $30,000, no assembly required. For the price of these homes, people could also purchase a manufactured/mobile home. This home is close to the same price as the Nomad homes, but has three bedrooms, two bathrooms, living room, dining room, large kitchen, and a laundry room. The master suite comes equipped with dual vanities, separate bath and showe,r and a walk in closet. The home also comes delivered and assembled, complete with air-conditioning. So in terms of price affordability, there are a lot of options in that current price range that offer people a lot more bang for their buck. Not sure what the incentive would be to go significantly smaller as it wouldn't actually be cheaper.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    569
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    The stairs don't meet any Canadian building code that I know of. We built a 10x10 shed in our back yard a few years ago, insulated and wired for small shop use and it is on piers, because of frost heave. 10x10 is the most we could put up without building permit but we had no restriction on height so it is 12 foot with loft for storage (pull down ladder) . It could be lived in, if you didn't mind the chemical camping toilet and roughed in sink from the garden hose (summer). A portable oil heater keeps it warm enough in the winter. But this cost us around $1500 in materials and we built it ourselves. If we paid someone to do it, it would be $5000 just to pick a generous number of $3500 for a weeks worth of carpenters. Add a sewer connection or septic bed, another $5000. Oh maybe we should drywall it. $1000. That is nowhere close to $30,000. So I agree with agalisgv and Gazpacho and JasperBoy, there are much more affordable ways to build a shack and the founder's message is unclear as to why they're doing this.

  18. #18
    Liberal Furry
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Packing for REAL London!
    Posts
    2,274
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2163
    No shower, no closets, stairs that are a disaster waiting to happen, no laundry, no space for a table (apart from the coffee table) and a bed that there is no way to make up unless you are on it at the time (and you would have to crouch while doing it- you couldn't stand up up there) or you could lean over it from the stairs. This is an interesting experiment, but not really "livable", although I suppose it could be used as an overnight guest cottage or something. There are much better "tiny house" designs out there there are a bit roomier and far more livable.
    I know. But I do not approve. And I am not resigned.
    (Edna St Vincent Millay)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •