Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 83
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    39
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    Exclamation What about the audience, Mr. Cinquanta?

    http://despre-toate-si-despre-nimic....cinquanta.html

    Picture this: skaters performing their programs – beautiful, intricate programs – in an empty arena. No one’s cheering, no one’s clapping. No one’s there. Seems like an impossible scenario? Trust me, it isn’t. The public doesn’t understand the scoring system; and, sooner or later, full of questions and frustrations, might leave the ice rinks for good. As many examples have shown, the scores seems to be going in a different direction than the choice of the audience – and this could very well be the end of figure skating as we know it. Simply put, the audience doesn’t connect anymore with the ubiquitous line: „Ladies and gentlemen, these are your medalists”. Frankly, in many cases, they’re not. The scoring system is faulty – and something needs to be done in order to address that.


    Where we stand now: along with hockey competition and opening/closing ceremonies, figure skating events are the most expensive when it comes to the Olympics. Tickets cost an arm and a leg – somewhere between 495 and 627 euro for men’s free program next year in Sochi (depends on who’s selling: Sochi Organizing Committee or a specific Authorized Ticket Reseller). But, really, will the public continue to spend huge amounts of money on the tickets, getting in return bitter and incomprehensible scoring experiences? The lesson to learn is that: ladies and gentlemen, figure skating officials, don’t take the audience for granted; you might be wrong.

    The scores don’t seem to represent what we’ve just seen on the ice
    Let’s begin with a sure thing: with the new scoring system (adopted by ISU in 2004, in response to the 2002 Olympic Winter Games figure skating scandal, involving the pairs’ event), figure skating became a very complicated sport. Even long-time watchers are having difficulties in understanding the scores received by a specific skater. In theory, the algorithm is known: we have the technical marks, on one hand, and the program components, on the other hand. Each technical element receives a number of points; and the components are, also, divided in categories: skating skills, transitions, performance/execution, choreography, interpretation. We know the rules; but when it comes to summing them up, the scores don’t seem to represent what we’ve just seen on the ice. In many cases, there’s a huge gap between the judges and the public when comes to the final result. And when this happens, there are many surprised and inquiring faces in the arena; and it might also be a lot of hissing. Is this the right direction in figure skating?

    Patrick Chan at the Worlds 2012: a controversial win
    Case study: World Figure Skating Championships in Nice, last year. In the men’s event, the audience felt that the Japanese skater Daisuke Takahashi was the winner of the evening. In the free skate, Mr. Takahashi pulled out a fantastic program, both technically and artistically; a program beautifully choreographed by Pasquale Camerlengo on „Blues for Klook”, suiting Daisuke like a glove. It poured with flowers on the Japanese; the audience was happy and enthusiastic, and so was Mr. Takahashi.
    Then the Canadian Patrick Chan took the ice – Mr. Chan, considered (for some years now) the wonder-boy of figure skating, given the rich content of his programs and his team’s ability to build for him programs which take 100% advantage of the new judging system. But, surprisingly, Mr. Chan was less convincing; he pulled out a very difficult program, but seemed to be in a rush, managing to fall in the middle of his exercise, while attempting a double Axel. At the end, he didn’t seem to be the winner. The audience – an international audience, to be clear – saw Patrick Chan as a silver candidate. But, given his scores, Mr. Chan was given the gold. And the arena started to hiss; and people continued to do that even during the medals’ ceremony, when the judges’ representative came to congratulate the medalists. Chan stated later he hadn’t heard the hissing, he hadn’t felt the disappointment of the public.

    It is as if figure skating became a closed affair, between the skaters and the judges
    Just a few days ago, in London (Canada), Patrick won his third World title after another not-so-convincing performance. Favorite of the home crowd, Patrick only needed to do his exercise in order to win the event; he was first and far ahead the other skaters after the short program. Instead, the Canadian fell on his Triple Axel and Triple Lutz, had a hand down on his Triple Salchow in combination and doubled another Lutz. „I was tired”, said Patrick to his coach, while waiting for the scores. And when these came – and Mr. Chan took the lead over the Spanish Javier Fernandez – it was another victory of the scoring system over the figure skating’ admirers and long-time watchers.

    As one of my friends has put it (a huge figure skating fan), it is as if this particular judging system is anti-audience. It really doesn’t reflect people’s taste and choices. So, here’s the question: when did the public lose his powers when it came to figure skating? After all, those marks given for presentation – in the old 6.0 system – seemed to have very well reflected the general impression of the watchers. The answer can’t be but this one: the gap between judges and the public started (and continued to grow) with this new ISU judging system.
    Introduced in order to eliminate the potential subjectivity of the judges – they have been, during the years, under intense scrutiny, accused in some cases of making deals, in order to favor one or the other – this new scoring system managed to make the audience completely disappear. It is as if figure skating became a closed affair, between the skaters and the judges; nothing less, nothing more. Now it’s not about the final impression of the program, about the best performance of the night in terms of jumps, art, emotion; it’s about adding 3.21 points from there, another 5.59 from there, 4.73 from there, 7.38 from there... Minus 2 points – and here’s your champion, ladies and gentlemen. Is this the right thing to do? We got rid of the old system – because, they say, it was subjective and vulnerable to abuse – and we have a new one, devoid of emotion; devoid of the audience’ voice.
    And here’s another annoying detail. Whenever someone asks: “What is it about those scores? I don’t get them”, there’s always an answer like: “You should study the scoring system before asking your question; you clearly don’t understand it (it – the system)”. This is obviously true: bud when did a sport become mathematics? What about the joy of watching figure skating and sharing the emotion? Where did all these things go?

    The system creates the impression that certain skaters are unbeatable
    And here’s another problem of this judging system: it creates statues, deities, aliens. It creates the impression that certain skaters, certain couples are unbeatable. Over the season, their scores get higher and higher, becoming Himalaya’s of the figure skating. This is, of course, the case of the same Patrick Chan. But this also applies to the American ice-dance couple Meryl Davis and Charlie White: the gap between them and the Canadians Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir seemed impossible to close during this entire season, in spite of the Canadians’ efforts. Take, for example, the ice dance final at the Worlds in London: the audience – a Canadian audience this time – felt that Virtue and Moir did everything in order to keep their World title; according to the scores, they didn’t.
    On the other hand, according to the same system, both couples – the Americans and the Canadians – seem to be at a distance of ages from the other competitors. In the eyes of the audience and former skaters, the French Nathalie Pechalat and Fabian Bourzat had a wonderful free program last season, on an Egyptian theme. But, in spite of their strong skate over the season, they remained well behind the couples from Canada and USA. As they remained behind the other Canadians, Kaitlyn Weaver and Andrew Poje, considered by some to have presented in Nice, last year, the highlight of the free dance’ event – an emotional program on „Je suis malade”.

    This Deities-Rule applies also to the Russian Tatiana Volosozhar&Maxim Trankov, skating in the pairs’ event. Second in the World Championships last year, Tatiana and Maxim became better and better this season; and, during the Grand-Prix events, the distance between them and the others, when it came to scores, was tremendous. And the scores were huge in spite of the errors which have really torn their programs apart: at the Grand-Prix Final in Sochi, Maxim fell while preparing to throw Tatiana in the air, for their triple Salchow, and she almost fell too – they needed 17 seconds to get back in the program, as Jackie Wong (Figure Skating Examiner) pointed out. That long and ugly break affected their performance – but you wouldn’t see that in their scores: they’ve won the final over their teammates Vera Bazarova and Yuri Larionov.

    Why should we watch figure skating if (the impression is) the dices are already thrown?
    If you ask me, this is bad for the audience. But it’s definitely bad for the skaters; especially for the younger ones. Here’s an example from the Worlds in London (Canada): after an amazing performance coming from Denis Ten, in the men’s final, the boy from Kazakhstan burst with enthusiasm in front of his coach Frank Carroll, when seeing the scores: „Wow! I almost beat Patrick!” If you ask me, he should have been happy for (almost) taking the gold, not for (almost) beating the Canadian... But Patrick, as previously stated, is regarded as a God in figure skating, given the scores he receives. And every other skater wants to defeat Patrick, makes a purpose out of defeating Patrick. (The Spanish Javier Fernandez managed to claim the gold at Skate Canada, defeating Patrick Chan, mostly because his coach had him jump three quadruples in his free program – a strategy to win over Chan). You may say competition is good, that competition brings the best in a skater, but this is not OK; this is not at all OK. With this kind of attitude as regards him, all that Patrick has to do at the Olympics next year is to show up. The gold will come easily. He could fall twice and still win. But what does this mean for the state of mind of everyone else involved in figure skating? For everyone else watching figure skating? Why should we watch it – or, even better, why should we attend the Olympics, at the expense of our pockets – if the dices are already thrown?

    I miss simplicity in figure skating
    When I was a child, scoring figure skating was easy. I had a parallel system, invented by me and used in order to get feedback from everyone in the family who was watching the programs. I had a point (●) for „bad” or „so, so”, a circle for „good” (o) and a circle crossed by a line for „very good” (ø). After a skater had finished his/her performance, I would ask mom and dad to state their vote; I was doing the same. My figure skating’ notebooks – and a have a lot of them; I’ve been watching figure skating since I was 7 – are full of these graphic signs. In most of the times, we would pick the right guy/girl/couple. In other words, there was a correspondence between our scores and the official ones. These were simple, good times. Could we, please, get back to that? I miss simplicity in figure skating.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    531
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I have no comment for this. But I'd like to say that worlds in London was SOLD OUT and the crowd was LOOOOOUUUUUUDDDDDD.

    There were a lot of happy campers in that building. Now tell me again the arena's are empty.....

  3. #3
    AYS's snark-sponge
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    in the Bobrova & Soloviev Fan Clubhouse
    Posts
    41,586
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15900
    I have a comment for it.
    Congratulations 2014 World Ice Dance Champions Anna Cappellini & Luca Lanotte!!!

  4. #4
    Watch me move
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gwyneth Paltrow Fan Club headquarters
    Posts
    16,762
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I seem to recall there being unbeatable skaters under 6.0 as well (e.g. Torvill and Dean).
    Who wants to watch rich people eat pizza? They must have loved that in Bangladesh. - Randy Newman on the 2014 Oscars broadcast

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,401
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    When was scoring ever simple? I've been led to believe that years ago the judges would determine who was going to win at the first stage (the figures.) Unless that person had a horrendous skate they won. I do think there are some loopholes that could be closed but I'm glad to see skaters judged on all of the elements instead of solely jumps. Maybe bigger deductions should be in place for falls or for having to stop for any reason. Maybe each category needs to be weighted differently. This year I was watching a resurrected "Gladiator" program during the men's competition. This was a winning program before CoP. Now it is mediocre. I'm happy about that because with the folks on the podium you see a lot more attention to detail in the programs. The system is far from perfect but please don't send us back before 2002.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,468
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1553
    Quote Originally Posted by somcutza View Post
    [Just a few days ago, in London (Canada), Patrick won his third World title after another not-so-convincing performance.
    Really, I was convinced....especially when you factor in the SHORT PROGRAM.

  7. #7
    Quadless
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Celebrating the power of Pooh
    Posts
    14,932
    vCash
    325
    Rep Power
    15984
    Quote Originally Posted by cbd1235 View Post
    But I'd like to say that worlds in London was SOLD OUT and the crowd was LOOOOOUUUUUUDDDDDD.

    There were a lot of happy campers in that building. Now tell me again the arena's are empty.....
    Was it really sold out? Because this Reuters article seems to suggest otherwise.

    Still, even the prospect of another showdown between the two 22-year-olds this week has not been enough to fill the 7,000-seat junior ice hockey arena chosen to host this year's worlds.

    "The arena wasn't as full as I expected," lamented Kim after winning the ladies short skate on Thursday. "I just kept trying to think that this was another practice session and I focused on that."

    While there are many seats available inside the Budweiser Gardens it has been standing room only in the media center where a battalion of Asian press have been camped out for the week-long competition.
    "I miss footwork that has any kind of a discernible pattern. The goal of a step sequence should not be for a skater to show the same ice coverage as a Zamboni and take about as much time as an ice resurface. " ~ Zemgirl, reflecting on a pre-IJS straight line sequence

  8. #8
    Recovering from the Olys
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    28,341
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17204
    At the bottom of the Reuters article:
    "(This version of the story corrects the first name of U.S. skater in paragraph 14 to Gracie sted Tracie.)"
    (I had posted this Reuters article, with the 3 name typos, in another thread: http://www.fsuniverse.net/forum/show...=1#post3878296 )

    Quote Originally Posted by somcutza View Post
    ... but when did a sport become mathematics? What about the joy of watching figure skating and sharing the emotion? Where did all these things go?
    I know many long-time fans who have lost interest in figure skating mainly because of this. Thanks for sharing your thoughts here.
    Last edited by Sylvia; 03-18-2013 at 10:19 PM.
    "Randy [Starkman (1960-April 16, 2012)] lived by the same motto as the rest of us. The Olympics isn’t every four years, it’s every single day. He just got it." --Canadian Olympic kayaker Adam van Koeverden

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    531
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BittyBug View Post
    Was it really sold out? Because this Reuters article seems to suggest otherwise.
    Ladies free, Mens free, Pairs free, Dance Free were sold out for sure. I was there for those and ladies short....the ladies short had the entire lower bowl sold, and I'd say 80% of the upper nosebleeds sold. I would presume it was similar for the other short programs but can't comment.

    The rink looked bare for ladies short partially due to the layout, this goes for every event too. There were a bunch of sections covered behind the judges and TV cameras (like A LOT), this made the whole judges side look empty, and plus behind that there were special sections for dignitaries only, these were not always filled but they weren't tickets available to the public. Finally, behind the kiss and cry (middle level), the seats were reserved for the choir and various other dignitaries etc. Again they were not available to the public. Those were mostly empty for the short programs.

    Some of my family wanted to grab last-minute tickets for the FS's on top of that, but they were sold out and no one could get tickets except from scalpers.

    ETA: Read the article, very bizarre :S, Everyone around me were talking about how shocked they were that the arena was sold out for so many events. The rink was jam packed for the FS's.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    174
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    21
    Quote from somcutza's first post: " This is obviously true: bud when did a sport become mathematics? "

    Just a comment:
    Every competitive sport that I know of uses a mathematical result, based on the rules of the game, to determine the winner. They measure how fast, how high, how many points, who was first to achieve the result that is the defined "win" for the game in question. Even before the new judging system, competitive figure skating used a mathematical system but the rules were not clearly defined. I for one am glad this changed. Competitive figure skating, particularly Ice Dance was often ridiculed due to the lack of a defined scoring system. I just wish the viewers/audiences remembered that the winner is determined by adding the points from two performances. There's that old math again. Maybe they need to give more status to the winner of each segment, as well as overall winner.

    I have seen many performances that moved me more than that of the winner but I can usually figure out why these performances didn't "win" according to the rules. That's ok. They don't have to win the competition in order to win your heart.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    11,069
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    If skating wants to be taken more seriously as a sport, it needs to be more rules and mathematically driven (objective) than artistically driven (subjective). That's how the integrity of the sport is maintained.

    To revive popularity, I view the key shouldn't be drama (off ice), but artistry (on ice). Rules need to allow creativity and variety. Most skaters have the same spins now. While it's good for direct comparison, it isn't interesting. Steps are too complicated and taking too long.

    For those who cry foul all the time, I wonder if you have taken the time and effort to understand the scoring but still disagree, or are still stuck in the 6.0 mindset where the cleaner performances score better by default without consideration to quality and other non jump elements and skills, or just because your favorite didn't win.

    And too many people are criticising without suggesting a better alternative or solution. Too convenient.

    As for returning to 6.0, I fail to see why we should return to a system that makes it so much easier to cheat when the crux of the problem all along is poor / corrupt judging.

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Two places! Atlanta suburbs and in the North Georgia Mountains
    Posts
    3,795
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1994
    I don't know the answers to all this, but is figure skating suppose to be an effort to conform to certain athletic technical rules, or is it supposed to be focused on what pleases audiences? I am keenly aware of the difference in the simplicity of, say, track and field events with the more complex rules of figure skating. I also know that if figure skating doesn't please audiences, isn't good at marketing itself, it will cease to exist. Is this because it's a lot harder to attract participants who need a huge amount of money to take lessons, buy equipment, pay for conditioning programs? Running track is a lot simpler and more accessible.

    I keep thinking of the line from "Strictly Ballroom," which stated "Those crowd pleasing steps!"

    Should skaters try to please audiences or judges? Pretty schizaphrenic. It's a mess. But, I believe a more appealing, beautiful and glamorous mess than playing soccer. To me, it might depend on whom we are trying to please: judges for validation or audiences for building a future existence? Considering the judging seems to be iffy, are audiences more important? I have no clue. Just guessing.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    2,555
    vCash
    400
    Rep Power
    6051
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueRidge View Post
    I have a comment for it.
    Does rolling eyes improve eyesight?
    Prosperity makes friends, adversity tries them. – Publilius Syrus

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    39
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I hope I'll have the time to answer everyone of you. Thanks for reading, by the way.
    I'm not saying they're empty now, I'm fearing they'll be empty at a certain point, given this growing feeling of frustration, coming from not-understanding the judging system. Anyway, I envy you for being there. I had only European Championship in Zagreb on my list this year. And, in fact, in Zagreb there was an obvious lack of interest and a loooot of empty seats.

    Quote Originally Posted by cbd1235 View Post
    I have no comment for this. But I'd like to say that worlds in London was SOLD OUT and the crowd was LOOOOOUUUUUUDDDDDD.

    There were a lot of happy campers in that building. Now tell me again the arena's are empty.....

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    39
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by overedge View Post
    I seem to recall there being unbeatable skaters under 6.0 as well (e.g. Torvill and Dean).
    I agree they were. And I'm not really saying that we should go back to 6.0. I'm just saying there should be an improvement in the system. I remember reading an interview with Zueva, in which she stated there will be changes after the Olympics.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    346
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by somcutza View Post
    I had only European Championship in Zagreb on my list this year. And, in fact, in Zagreb there was an obvious lack of interest and a loooot of empty seats.
    Yes it was very empty. I wonder why do they organize the competitions in such countries where there is no interest anyways. And the competitions should be marketed better and use famous skaters faces and names just like they market the shows, which are often full.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    10,429
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by somcutza View Post
    This is obviously true: bud when did a sport become mathematics? What about the joy of watching figure skating and sharing the emotion? Where did all these things go?
    It is a SPORT. If you want joy and emotion, you need to go to a show.

    I get wrapped up in the excitement of the sport of figure skating- my heart races to see if my favorite will be able to hold it together to complete a winning program, or will she fall on her butt randomly during a step sequence? My husband is the same way with college basketball.

    But to see a beautiful program that evokes emotion of going to a ballet? That isn't a sport. Which is why, athletic as it is, ballet is not a sport. And the ballet competitions often have criticism that their competitors are robotic only focused on the perfect step and missing the emotion. Because that is what happens when you quantify art and judge it. It becomes 'higher, faster, stronger" and not about pure emotion.

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    39
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Cachoo View Post
    When was scoring ever simple? .
    You have a point. But now it's complex mathematics. Or maybe the impression of simplicity comes from the fact that I was a child growing with 6.0 system and I got used to it. The key-idea remains: now it's too complicated; and not understanding it leads to giving up on figure skating. (I'm not sure if having specialists explaining it would really work...) I used to love dance performances when I was a child: the dance was obviously free; and that freedom allowed them to do a lot of things on the ice. Now it's everything about twizzles, spins, steps... you have no room for freedom. And if you're wrong on your twizzles for half of second, you're sentenced to go down. I don't like that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cachoo View Post
    The system is far from perfect but please don't send us back before 2002.
    I'd love to see some changes. I'm not saying we should go back. There's, actually, a lot of nostalgia in my story; figure skating events were seen in the family and really enjoyed in the family. I'm certain of that: falls should more severely penalized; and a clean program should be a lot more appreciated. The final general impression should matter.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    39
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by julieann View Post
    Really, I was convinced....especially when you factor in the SHORT PROGRAM.
    The Short Program of Patrick was amazing. I agree with that.
    On the other hand, Patrick is not the enemy here; is just an example to state my case. As a matter of fact, I really appreciate him and, seeing him in practice in Torino, in 2010, and Nice, in 2012, I know he's unbelievably hard-working. He's good not only because he has smart programs, which take advantage of the scoring system, but because he's working very much. I used to watch him for minutes in practice (sometimes, he was the only one who showed up at the first practices), telling to myself: this boy is good. So, yes, I'm convinced by him when he's flawless. And I'm not convinced when he's not.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    321
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by somcutza View Post
    I'm just saying there should be an improvement in the system.
    What's your suggestion?! Bring it here!

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •